Hello you all.
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:34 am
Before anything else, I advise I'm still learning english so please be patient if you encounter mistakes (But let me know constructively so that I can take note).
My name is Andrea, which comes from the Greek Ἀνδρέας' (Andréas), meaning ''manly and strong". I live in Milan, a beautiful city located in the northern part of the Italian peninsula.
Our country, and northern regions particularly due to their higher living standards, has been subject of a consistent immigration during the past 30+ years. Recent years turmoils spread all over north-african countries have only increased the immigration trend which has been going on for decades.
During my school carreer, I was always in multi-racial classes and thus became friend of many people whose parents immigrated in my country.
As immigrants in Italy are given pretty much the same treatment of Italian citizens (exept non-citizens cannot vote nor invest public charges), most of them are able to reach a decent quality of life (as opposed to many other less stranger-friendly countries) and learn to fit in our society. Exept some of them, who gets either sent back home or in jail just like all the other law-breaking citizens.
What I've learnt and now I'm sure of, is that the distribution of genetical, natural born as****es among a population is pretty much the same for every race. I have known many awesome people who were strangers, and many awful people who were Italian.
Could anyone point me to any proof that races act differently due to their genes rather than due to their human condition?
And even if, let's say, there was certain differences among different races, would you exclude/eliminate 100% of their population if only the 30% were "genetically killers" or, dunno, "genetically pedophiles"? Because, if so, any other race should have the same right to exterminate our race - or at least try to -. And this sounds bulls**t to me.
I would rather see burned all those who actually commit crimes rather than 50% of local guilties and 150% of stranger guilties (meaning all the strangers + 50% innocents declared guilty).
This makes me think that discriminating those who are not white, or who are not '[insert adjective here]' on an 'a priori' basis is wrong and narrow minded. In my opinion everyone should be given an opportunity to make the country a better place and be rejected/convicted if he actually makes or try to make it worse.
This said, i think anything should be taken with a grain of salt. And when immigration becomes invasion it's time to re-discuss the whole thing. But this is all another story.
My name is Andrea, which comes from the Greek Ἀνδρέας' (Andréas), meaning ''manly and strong". I live in Milan, a beautiful city located in the northern part of the Italian peninsula.
Our country, and northern regions particularly due to their higher living standards, has been subject of a consistent immigration during the past 30+ years. Recent years turmoils spread all over north-african countries have only increased the immigration trend which has been going on for decades.
During my school carreer, I was always in multi-racial classes and thus became friend of many people whose parents immigrated in my country.
As immigrants in Italy are given pretty much the same treatment of Italian citizens (exept non-citizens cannot vote nor invest public charges), most of them are able to reach a decent quality of life (as opposed to many other less stranger-friendly countries) and learn to fit in our society. Exept some of them, who gets either sent back home or in jail just like all the other law-breaking citizens.
What I've learnt and now I'm sure of, is that the distribution of genetical, natural born as****es among a population is pretty much the same for every race. I have known many awesome people who were strangers, and many awful people who were Italian.
Could anyone point me to any proof that races act differently due to their genes rather than due to their human condition?
And even if, let's say, there was certain differences among different races, would you exclude/eliminate 100% of their population if only the 30% were "genetically killers" or, dunno, "genetically pedophiles"? Because, if so, any other race should have the same right to exterminate our race - or at least try to -. And this sounds bulls**t to me.
I would rather see burned all those who actually commit crimes rather than 50% of local guilties and 150% of stranger guilties (meaning all the strangers + 50% innocents declared guilty).
This makes me think that discriminating those who are not white, or who are not '[insert adjective here]' on an 'a priori' basis is wrong and narrow minded. In my opinion everyone should be given an opportunity to make the country a better place and be rejected/convicted if he actually makes or try to make it worse.
This said, i think anything should be taken with a grain of salt. And when immigration becomes invasion it's time to re-discuss the whole thing. But this is all another story.