Hello again.
I'm writing this post to ask for help.
I was banned from stormfront some time ago. My username was "lusitan" and i had been a member for many years.
I was banned because i expressed my ideas on the jewish question after saying i supported the racialist movement Bloc Identitaire, which is friends with American Renaissance.
I basically said i didn't believe there was a conspiracy by the jews to destroy the white race. This together with some silly posts made me be expelled.
Since then thanks to research by my brother and things i found (such as video of an important jewess saying clearly what were doing, and also a document called Kalergi Plan), i've changed my mind.
I was hoping that someone from here who is a member could put a word for me there and explain the situation.
Because as i've said in my previous introduction post, i plan someday to live in eastern Tennessee, and i know that there is a PLE in formation in that area. I plan to contact them someday, and eventually in the relatively distant future be part of that PLE.
Can someone help me?
P.S. - you can copy this message there if you want. Thanks
I was banned from Stormfront
-
Michael Olanich
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
Hello there,
I have a Stormfront account but I do not use it often. They are quite unfriendly to our position here in the new NA, and they won't allow us to post and promote ADV transcripts over there.
If you want my advice, you should pm either Don Black or Jack Boot, who is the chief moderator at Stormfront, and try to apologize for any indiscretion you might have caused. If you are reasonable they'll probably restore your account.
Sincerely,
Michael
I have a Stormfront account but I do not use it often. They are quite unfriendly to our position here in the new NA, and they won't allow us to post and promote ADV transcripts over there.
If you want my advice, you should pm either Don Black or Jack Boot, who is the chief moderator at Stormfront, and try to apologize for any indiscretion you might have caused. If you are reasonable they'll probably restore your account.
Sincerely,
Michael
-
Nicodemus
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
Alright. Thanks Michael.
I find it odd that they dislike NA though... they seem to have compatible ideas.
I find it odd that they dislike NA though... they seem to have compatible ideas.
-
Will Williams
- Posts: 5385
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
The Stormfront idiscussion board is very large and all over the board ideologically speaking. SF is good for entry-level people, new to racial politics. We're more focused here on solutions. We are guided by the world view of Dr. William Pierce, Founder of our National Alliance and of Cosmotheism, a non-Yahwehist religion.Nicodemus wrote:I find it odd that they dislike NA though... they seem to have compatible ideas.
You've already come a long way on the JQ. Read for a while what's here at WB and at http://www.natall.com and you might come further our way.
We don't put in words for people who've been kicked off Stormfront, asking SF to allow them back on. We're not big on SF's "Mantra" or their PLE program or much else in the way of Whites trying to organize there. We're a movement unto ourselves, momolithic.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ
-
Igraine
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
Hi Nicodemus,Nicodemus wrote:Alright. Thanks Michael.
I find it odd that they dislike NA though... they seem to have compatible ideas.
i would not put much stock in the true ideas of those in control of Stormfront being compatible with that of Dr Pierce and Natall. I am of the opinion that it wishes its members to believe that the British National Party (BNP) is a NOT a Jewish Zionist construct meant to perform for the camera.
The sure sign of an infiltrated or faux movement is failure to adhere to core principles. Race is the anchor because it is the source from which our culture and spirituality spring. The mere suggestion of 'multicult' infiltration and the sanctity of the space created is destroyed. The culture of the White Man cannot be produced without the race to produce it.
-
Michael Olanich
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
That is Stormfront's problem - a lack of any core principles to guide themselves by, which gives me the impression that it's really the money they seek rather than expecting its users to adhere to any code. I even suggested to Mr. Black that he includes a page at the top of SF that explains its Mission and also the core beliefs of Stormfront as a whole. I was told that it would be considered, so I don't know. Although I'd be surprised to see something like that done in the near future.
One other thing that I did not particularly like was how an agent of the SPLC was able to attend Stormfront's conference seminar last November. Don was saying on his program many times before the conference how he would be thoroughly checking the background of everyone attending, so not just anyone can get in. Yet this SPLC reporter was allowed to attend and then cover the conference in an article for the SPLC.
I agree with Will, the "Mantra" in my opinion is useless, and sounds very robotic when repeated over and over by some people. I doubt its success in convincing any among our race to start thinking deeply about the problems affecting our race.
One other thing that I did not particularly like was how an agent of the SPLC was able to attend Stormfront's conference seminar last November. Don was saying on his program many times before the conference how he would be thoroughly checking the background of everyone attending, so not just anyone can get in. Yet this SPLC reporter was allowed to attend and then cover the conference in an article for the SPLC.
I agree with Will, the "Mantra" in my opinion is useless, and sounds very robotic when repeated over and over by some people. I doubt its success in convincing any among our race to start thinking deeply about the problems affecting our race.
-
Nicodemus
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
William, i've already read the ideological texts, and also some of the articles in National Vanguard.
I identify with almost all of it, though my religion, or better said, my spiritual beliefs are just a little bit criticized in some ideological texts.
I'm not a follower of any of the abrahamic religions, but i identify most with greek paganism, and practice it's mystical system of spiritual evolution, called theurgy or hermeticism. This is a form of spiritualism, and i've seen you criticized mystic/spiritualist systems. Its not incompatible at all though, its even very similar, except in the fact that we recognize the existence of the metaphysical part of the universe, rather than just physical. It has in common the belief in the "Whole" which we call The All, and the idea that beings progresses towards perfection in a never ending path, and that that's the purpose of existence.
Cosmotheism presents just technology and other mundane methods to progress towards this goal, however theurgy, like the other systems of spiritual evolution, like yoga, buddhism, taoism etc. gives us meditation, and latter other advanced metaphycial practices to progress towards this goal and achieve higher states of consciousness. Some have even became gods with this, they were called by indians 'avatars' beings like Buddha, Krishna, Babaji, etc.
There are scientific proofs that meditation has real effects; they've analised the brain activity of buddhist monks who had reach enlightenment, and they found very odd things.
Anyway, Pierce got very close to some things the various masters taught through ages, in his religion of Cosmotheism. He must have been a very high soul to be able to discern these things without contact with mysticism nor having the intuitive perception that comes with higher states of consciousness and progress in meditation.
I'm not an american, here in Europe we almost don't have this kind of phenomenon we see in stormfront. People here have an ideological formation and a very different mentality. I've read many ideological texts, and i identify most with the identitarian ideologists, my favorite is Guillaume Faye. I've also written ideological texts.
I just wanted to rejoin Stormfront to have contact with the Tennessee PLE. I don't identify much with the environment and type of discussions people have there...
Though recently i've found a facebook page of PLE, and maybe i can contact them through there.
I identify with almost all of it, though my religion, or better said, my spiritual beliefs are just a little bit criticized in some ideological texts.
I'm not a follower of any of the abrahamic religions, but i identify most with greek paganism, and practice it's mystical system of spiritual evolution, called theurgy or hermeticism. This is a form of spiritualism, and i've seen you criticized mystic/spiritualist systems. Its not incompatible at all though, its even very similar, except in the fact that we recognize the existence of the metaphysical part of the universe, rather than just physical. It has in common the belief in the "Whole" which we call The All, and the idea that beings progresses towards perfection in a never ending path, and that that's the purpose of existence.
Cosmotheism presents just technology and other mundane methods to progress towards this goal, however theurgy, like the other systems of spiritual evolution, like yoga, buddhism, taoism etc. gives us meditation, and latter other advanced metaphycial practices to progress towards this goal and achieve higher states of consciousness. Some have even became gods with this, they were called by indians 'avatars' beings like Buddha, Krishna, Babaji, etc.
There are scientific proofs that meditation has real effects; they've analised the brain activity of buddhist monks who had reach enlightenment, and they found very odd things.
Anyway, Pierce got very close to some things the various masters taught through ages, in his religion of Cosmotheism. He must have been a very high soul to be able to discern these things without contact with mysticism nor having the intuitive perception that comes with higher states of consciousness and progress in meditation.
I'm not an american, here in Europe we almost don't have this kind of phenomenon we see in stormfront. People here have an ideological formation and a very different mentality. I've read many ideological texts, and i identify most with the identitarian ideologists, my favorite is Guillaume Faye. I've also written ideological texts.
I just wanted to rejoin Stormfront to have contact with the Tennessee PLE. I don't identify much with the environment and type of discussions people have there...
Though recently i've found a facebook page of PLE, and maybe i can contact them through there.
-
Cosmotheist
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
Nicodemus wrote:
I identify with almost all of it, though my religion, or better said,
my spiritual beliefs are just a little bit criticized in some ideological texts
Which ones, and where, specifically, are they a little bit criticized?
Curious.
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=788
Nicodemus wrote:
I'm not a follower of any of the abrahamic religions, but i identify most with greek paganism, and practice it's mystical system of spiritual evolution, called theurgy or hermeticism. This is a form of spiritualism, and i've seen you criticized mystic/spiritualist systems. Its not incompatible at all though, its even very similar, except in the fact that we recognize the existence of the metaphysical part of the universe, rather than just physical. It has in common the belief in the "Whole" which we call The All, and the idea that beings progresses towards perfection in a never ending path, and that that's the purpose of existence.
Dr. Pierce's Cosmotheism is a panentheism that fully recognizes the metaphysical part of the universe,
rather than just the physical, so you are quite mistaken in your "except". The idea of the Whole as the
Creator and its own true Purpose is its own self-realization in a Personal Godhood is virtually identical
with your own.
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=5
Cosmotheism is a religion which positively asserts that there is an internal purpose in life and in cosmos,
and that there is an essential unity, or consciousness that binds all living beings and all of the inorganic cosmos,
as one. What is our true human identity is that we humans are of the Cosmos and are made self-aware and self-
conscious by Cosmic evolution. Our true human purpose is to both know and to complete our own selves as both
as highly conscious Individuals and also as a highly self-aware species and thereby to consciously co-evolve with
the cosmos towards a total and complete universal awareness, and ever towards the ever higher perfection of
both Cosmic and Self-consciousness and being.
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=6
Not all "mystic/spiritualist" systems are being criticized, but,
only the very specific ones that are "scientifically untenable".
Nicodemus wrote:
Cosmotheism presents just technology and other mundane methods to progress towards this goal, however theurgy, like the other systems of spiritual evolution, like yoga, buddhism, taoism etc. gives us meditation,
and latter other advanced metaphycial practices to progress towards this goal and achieve higher states of consciousness.
That is not actually the case that "Cosmotheism presents just technology
and other mundane methods to progress towards this goal", whatsoever.
Again, not all "mystic/spiritualist" systems are being criticized, but,
only the very specific ones that are "scientifically untenable".
Nicodemus wrote:
Some have even became gods with this, they were called by indians
'avatars' beings like Buddha, Krishna, Babaji, etc.
Any such outstanding claims like those do require outstanding evidence and proof
to be acceptable as being valid or true.
Again, not all "mystic/spiritualist" systems are being criticized, but,
only these or any very specific ones that are "scientifically untenable".
Nicodemus wrote:
There are scientific proofs that meditation has real effects;
they've analised the brain activity of buddhist monks who had reach enlightenment,
and they found very odd things.
True enough, and all such is worthy of additional scientific research and scrutiny.
Nicodemus wrote:
Anyway, Pierce got very close to some things the various masters taught through ages, in his religion of Cosmotheism. He must have been a very high soul to be able to discern these things without contact with mysticism nor having the intuitive perception that comes with higher states of consciousness and progress in meditation.
Agreed.
Being both spiritually-attuned and scientifically-trained in physics had to help him discern
these "higher" Whole Truths of Reality, as well. Intuitive perceptions and a consciousness
of the "Whole" and meditation on these can result in higher states of consciousness or can
arise from many methods and means and some "mysticism" is but one such way as also in
The Path .
See the Cosmotheist Affirmation linked below:
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1505
Best regards,
Cosmotheist
I identify with almost all of it, though my religion, or better said,
my spiritual beliefs are just a little bit criticized in some ideological texts
Which ones, and where, specifically, are they a little bit criticized?
Curious.
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=788
Nicodemus wrote:
I'm not a follower of any of the abrahamic religions, but i identify most with greek paganism, and practice it's mystical system of spiritual evolution, called theurgy or hermeticism. This is a form of spiritualism, and i've seen you criticized mystic/spiritualist systems. Its not incompatible at all though, its even very similar, except in the fact that we recognize the existence of the metaphysical part of the universe, rather than just physical. It has in common the belief in the "Whole" which we call The All, and the idea that beings progresses towards perfection in a never ending path, and that that's the purpose of existence.
Dr. Pierce's Cosmotheism is a panentheism that fully recognizes the metaphysical part of the universe,
rather than just the physical, so you are quite mistaken in your "except". The idea of the Whole as the
Creator and its own true Purpose is its own self-realization in a Personal Godhood is virtually identical
with your own.
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=5
Cosmotheism is a religion which positively asserts that there is an internal purpose in life and in cosmos,
and that there is an essential unity, or consciousness that binds all living beings and all of the inorganic cosmos,
as one. What is our true human identity is that we humans are of the Cosmos and are made self-aware and self-
conscious by Cosmic evolution. Our true human purpose is to both know and to complete our own selves as both
as highly conscious Individuals and also as a highly self-aware species and thereby to consciously co-evolve with
the cosmos towards a total and complete universal awareness, and ever towards the ever higher perfection of
both Cosmic and Self-consciousness and being.
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=6
Not all "mystic/spiritualist" systems are being criticized, but,
only the very specific ones that are "scientifically untenable".
Nicodemus wrote:
Cosmotheism presents just technology and other mundane methods to progress towards this goal, however theurgy, like the other systems of spiritual evolution, like yoga, buddhism, taoism etc. gives us meditation,
and latter other advanced metaphycial practices to progress towards this goal and achieve higher states of consciousness.
That is not actually the case that "Cosmotheism presents just technology
and other mundane methods to progress towards this goal", whatsoever.
Again, not all "mystic/spiritualist" systems are being criticized, but,
only the very specific ones that are "scientifically untenable".
Nicodemus wrote:
Some have even became gods with this, they were called by indians
'avatars' beings like Buddha, Krishna, Babaji, etc.
Any such outstanding claims like those do require outstanding evidence and proof
to be acceptable as being valid or true.
Again, not all "mystic/spiritualist" systems are being criticized, but,
only these or any very specific ones that are "scientifically untenable".
Nicodemus wrote:
There are scientific proofs that meditation has real effects;
they've analised the brain activity of buddhist monks who had reach enlightenment,
and they found very odd things.
True enough, and all such is worthy of additional scientific research and scrutiny.
Nicodemus wrote:
Anyway, Pierce got very close to some things the various masters taught through ages, in his religion of Cosmotheism. He must have been a very high soul to be able to discern these things without contact with mysticism nor having the intuitive perception that comes with higher states of consciousness and progress in meditation.
Agreed.
Being both spiritually-attuned and scientifically-trained in physics had to help him discern
these "higher" Whole Truths of Reality, as well. Intuitive perceptions and a consciousness
of the "Whole" and meditation on these can result in higher states of consciousness or can
arise from many methods and means and some "mysticism" is but one such way as also in
The Path .
See the Cosmotheist Affirmation linked below:
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1505
Best regards,
Cosmotheist
-
David York
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
I dislike Stormfront. I remember one of my first posts there I was talking to someone and I quoted one of William Pierce's broadcasts, the Killing of Kayla, when he said the Jews whooped us good in the 1920's and 1930's and we didn't even take our gloves off, but this time we will fight with our gloves off." and this person (who I won't name here) responded by saying what good did William Pierce do? His organization fell apart after he died. Then he tried to feed me this Mantra and suggest that Bob Whitaker's strategy was better than Pierce's. I was personally offended by this. I told him that what Pierce accomplished while he was alive is what mattered, not what happened to the NA after he died. After that I gradually found there was no real unity at Stormfront, nor was there any mission or program for them to accomplish their goals, which is supposedly to ensure a future for white people. They have no organization and other than a radio show and a bunch of disorganized posters, I don't see them going to any lengths to actually do something for white people. There is also too many differing ideologies there and to many theological groups competing for their place on the pedestal. Most of all they don't give credit to other Great white Nationalists currently in the movement, including Kevin Alfred Strom. The things they allow people to say about Kevin there is appalling. If I were you Nicodemus I would not even waste my time on Stormfront. You should join the National alliance, or pledge your support. The National Alliance is a goal oriented organization that has a plan to effect change, unlike the aimless direction that Stormfront takes.
-
Nicodemus
Re: i was banned from Stormfront
Thanks for your clarifications, Cosmotheist. 
The western mystical path is very scientific, it has it's roots in ancient Greece and Egypt. It involves also the use of dialectics.
I can explain why we affirm some things we affirm, its not like some kind of dogma that is not discussed like that that exists in religions.
Many of the things that mysticism has affirmed for many centuries or millenia have been proven scientifically or are close to being proven, by modern science. Like the existence of multiple universes, that matter is made of energy, the existance of the atom, etc. The book that introduced me to mysticism, and proved me deductively the existence of God is called Kybalion and is available on the internet for free.
Mysticism is a science like mundane science, but is not materialist, and does not study only the physical part of existance. One day though, spirituality and mundane science will be one.
The criticism i was talking about was this: " and not the separate spiritual and physical realms of the supernaturalists". I seen its not talking about spiritualists but "supernaturalists". But we recognize, as plato, the existence of metaphysical things, though they are integrated in the physical of course. Like Plato we believe in the existence of the soul after death (the mental and emotional bodies), though only a remote part of our soul survives after death and is the same after reincarnation.
Mundane science has studied reincarnation, but though there were some odd phenomenon, like children remembering past lifes of people that were then investigated, the scientists dismissed this through psychological theories.
However if we progress enough in the mystical path we will remember past lifes, so there is a method and a result, this is science.
Plato found out this things through deduction.
Here's an interesting explanation of Plato's theory of forms: http://www.anselm.edu/homepage/dbanach/platform.htm
Not looking back more carefully this might not be a criticism of mysticism and more of new age crap, though it could be interpreted that way.
Here's my school, it has several articles explaining what this is and some introductory information:
http://thedivinescience.org/
The western mystical path is very scientific, it has it's roots in ancient Greece and Egypt. It involves also the use of dialectics.
I can explain why we affirm some things we affirm, its not like some kind of dogma that is not discussed like that that exists in religions.
Many of the things that mysticism has affirmed for many centuries or millenia have been proven scientifically or are close to being proven, by modern science. Like the existence of multiple universes, that matter is made of energy, the existance of the atom, etc. The book that introduced me to mysticism, and proved me deductively the existence of God is called Kybalion and is available on the internet for free.
Mysticism is a science like mundane science, but is not materialist, and does not study only the physical part of existance. One day though, spirituality and mundane science will be one.
The criticism i was talking about was this: " and not the separate spiritual and physical realms of the supernaturalists". I seen its not talking about spiritualists but "supernaturalists". But we recognize, as plato, the existence of metaphysical things, though they are integrated in the physical of course. Like Plato we believe in the existence of the soul after death (the mental and emotional bodies), though only a remote part of our soul survives after death and is the same after reincarnation.
Mundane science has studied reincarnation, but though there were some odd phenomenon, like children remembering past lifes of people that were then investigated, the scientists dismissed this through psychological theories.
However if we progress enough in the mystical path we will remember past lifes, so there is a method and a result, this is science.
Plato found out this things through deduction.
Here's an interesting explanation of Plato's theory of forms: http://www.anselm.edu/homepage/dbanach/platform.htm
Not looking back more carefully this might not be a criticism of mysticism and more of new age crap, though it could be interpreted that way.
Here's my school, it has several articles explaining what this is and some introductory information:
http://thedivinescience.org/