Who Rules America?

[Jim Mathias]

This National Alliance publication by that name was one well known to seasoned Whites of the National Alliance 20 years ago along with many others who were introduced to it, and was a huge influence at bringing understanding of the enormous Jewish problem our race has with the controlled media. Who Rules America? (WRA?) is no longer published, sadly. Dedicated individuals are necessary to do the enormous amounts of research to make and keep updated this important information over the years. This is not an excuse, but rather reality as it stands, yet something productive can still be done.

Let this thread be the bare re-beginning of a new start to this project. I propose that any forum member may pitch in with expressed examples of Jewish domination of the mass forms of communication in order to create an online database for a compiler to use in remaking WRA? as an official NA publication. I ask that comments be limited to other examples of Jewish media control/domination and constructive criticism only.

To begin, I offer this video on Elon Musk, his control of the online platform known as X, and how Jews are wresting control of it from Musk. I'm unsure about how to embed videos in a WB post so I'll just post the link here: https://rumble.com/v48t6o6-elon-musk-is ... nutes.html Perhaps someone will do me the favor of embedding the video in a subsequent post.

[Trenton]

I’d be eager to see if anyone else has anything on Jewish and leftist domination of Wikipedia and other “unbiased” sources of information. It’s positively Orwellian the degree to which information that our (((tyrannical overlords))) don’t want us to disseminate can be completely buried under mountains of often-irrelevant garbage, not to mention complete falsehoods.

In the case of Wikipedia, politically unacceptable information can be not only overwritten, but also expunged from the editing records, with the offending users banned. Co-founder Larry Sanger stated that
"The days of Wikipedia's robust commitment to neutrality are long gone. Wikipedia's ideological and religious bias is real and troubling, particularly in a resource that continues to be treated by many as an unbiased reference work.” He cites one example, Wikipedia’s main article on Communism.

In this article, Sanger claims that Wikipedia editors “Whitewash crimes against humanity,” in the Soviet Union, and “fail to note any of the atrocities committed by socialist and communist regimes…”

Sources: https://www.resistance.org/wikipedia (which sites several sources on its own)
https://nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia ... blishment/