"VIKINGS" GETS DIVERSIFIED

Post Reply
John Calhoun

"VIKINGS" GETS DIVERSIFIED

Post by John Calhoun » Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:05 pm

I am not much of a TV viewer but many folks in the so-called "movement" enjoy the show "Vikings." Well, the televised exploits of our noble ancestors have just gotten a good dose of diversity. The History Channel which is a subsidiary of Bob Iger's (Jewish) Walt Disney Company has decided that the leading man needs a non-white girlfriend. It seems the show was just too white.

That is an obvious trick of theirs. Give the masses some of the goods and then slowly poison it while they hungrily devour it. The old saying about boiling a frog is a very apt description here. Turn the heat up slowly and incrementally until the frog is cooked and doesn't even know it.

http://www.popsugar.com/entertainment/Y ... s-39911576

adolf512

Re: "VIKINGS" GETS DIVERSIFIED

Post by adolf512 » Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:38 pm

This is not surprising. In the beginning they feel preassured to make the show good and innovative, once enough people is hooked the milking begins and the quality drops like a rock.

This is why i refuse to watch TV-shows, i have never liked it and now as a racialist i dislike it even more. This is how propaganda works, they add suger(entertainment) to the poison(jewish propaganda). Do not be stupid enough to believe it does not effect you, it always does in some way.

Martin Graves

Re: "VIKINGS" GETS DIVERSIFIED

Post by Martin Graves » Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:27 pm

adolf512 wrote:This is not surprising. In the beginning they feel preassured to make the show good and innovative, once enough people is hooked the milking begins and the quality drops like a rock.

This is why i refuse to watch TV-shows, i have never liked it and now as a racialist i dislike it even more. This is how propaganda works, they add suger(entertainment) to the poison(jewish propaganda). Do not be stupid enough to believe it does not effect you, it always does in some way.
Never seen an episode of Vikings, but one show I do enjoy watching is The Man in High Castle. I'm sure they'll try and make the National Socialists look even worse next season, but so far the first season has no real faults.

Alexander Noble

Re: "VIKINGS" GETS DIVERSIFIED

Post by Alexander Noble » Fri Jan 29, 2016 12:28 pm

That concerns me a bit. I've been hearing about Vikings for the last few years and just started watching it on my Amazon Prime about two weeks ago. I just started the third season last night, in fact. I've been loving it and kicking myself in the behind for not starting sooner. John is right, it was only a matter of time before the higher ups started putting a few drops of strychnine in the sugar. The only surprise I have is that it took them until the fourth season. I'll finish watching the third season then see what develops for the fourth as it is possible for something to be made of this (for example, spin it as Ragnar stumbles, but then redeems himself by coming back to the light, or some such) but I'll admit I'm not hopeful. Most likely Ragnar will become an anachronistic social justice warrior and the show will spiral into ridiculous anti-White propaganda. I'll stop watching long before then. It reminds me of several years back when my ex-wife started watching one of endless re-adaptations of the Robin Hood story. She insisted that I watch it with her, but one of the main characters was an incongruous and absurd Muslim woman (who didn't look, dress, act, or think like a Muslim woman), who was portrayed as smarter and more sophisticated than the English "dullards" around her. It was so absurd I couldn't stomach it, even though I was still on the dark side back then. If this goes down as I expect it must, then it's just one more proof that alternative media must continue to be developed so that eventually we have A to Z, top-to-bottom control of our own media from conceptual idea to released product. A tall order, but necessary.

WNNana

Re: "VIKINGS" GETS DIVERSIFIED

Post by WNNana » Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:36 am

Around 18 or so years ago, there was a remake of the "Little House on the Prairie" movie. The little house books and then the TV show was something I greatly enjoyed as a child, so I excitedly settled in with my oldest 2 to watch. I vividly remember the scene that led me to turn it off-the family had made it to Dakota terrority and was all settled in. Laura went out to pick berries or something, and ran across an Indian child. There was Laura and this little brown skinned boy, laughing and playing happily together. First of all, no such thing happened in the books. Furthermore, in the 1880's, no white girl child would have been sent out alone to wander around if there were Indians that close, and they most certainly would not be making friends and playing with them!I became convinced right then that political correctness had run amok and was destroying history.

Post Reply