White Biocentrism

That is the choice we face in America today. That is the choice that we, the people of European descent, face everywhere we still live in the world today. That is the question that our people should be thinking about every day of our lives. Separation or annihilation. That is the question upon which we must take sides. That is the question upon which, whether you know it or not, you have already taken sides. For if you are not for separation, you are for annihilation. There is no middle ground.

Spencer: [S]ince modern media amplifies [sic] the few fields in which blacks truly excel (i.e, sports, music, and show biz) and since they are aided and abetted by the enemies of whites (i.e., left-wing Jews) they have become a formidable political and cultural force…
—

True, Spencer. So, what’s the solution? Who offers the solution? The young Christian conservative evangelist Charlie Kirk styled himself a leader of our race (and everybody else). He had a couple of days to contemplate the savage murder of Iryna Zarutska prior to being assassinated himself. What did he offer as a solution to such anti-White savagery besides encouraging folks to embrace his imaginary Jesus as their personal savior? That is pie-in-the-sky nonsense, but millions of his gullible followers online were/are still buying it.

The solution is total geographic separation by the best of eligible, racially responsible Whites from all Blacks, including those you say “truly excel (sports, music and show biz).” And not just from Blacks but from all non-Whites, especially from Jews, “left-wing,” or otherwise.

Voluntary racial separation by eligible Whites into their own exclusionary, disciplined communities is not a pipe dream. It is achievable. See here, and compare with other solutions: “What is the National Alliance?” at natall.com. — Building a New White World.[/quote]

Gam: September 11, 2025 I love the quote you recently offered from Dr. Pierce: “To be, or to be nice”. In the interest of self preservation and by extension, racial preservation, being nice is a hindrance.
---

That headline is one of my favorites from Pierce, who, BTW, whould have been 92 today, 9/11, had he lived.

Whites’ altruism is misdirected from our own kind to others. That’s a Christian thing. There’s nothing wrong with being nice, but Whites’ love of other races must stop without apologies to anyone.

Ben Klassen, who, like Pierce, founded a religion for Whites to replace Christianity, was also one of our race’s greatest headline writers. The one headline of his that’s most appropriate for the subject of this essay by Spencer: Who Needs Niggers?

Ask that question over and over, and after each new violent incident of a Black ravage of a White. Whites don’t need ’em. That is a fact. We always did fine without ’em.

Greg: America… is now two nations sharing the same territory and political system, slowly coming to the realization that we can’t live with one another, that we are in a zero-sum struggle for survival, that it’s them or us.

Thank you, Greg. I’m not as bothered about the loss of Charlie Kirk to assassination as others are — if only because he was an Israel-Firster. He may have come more our way eventually, but his support of Israel and being an evangelist for “JudeoChristianity” put him in Their camp, not Ours. He was leading millions of our youth on campuses and online in the wrong direction.

I’m not sympathetic at all to the young White assassin, either, especially if the rumor that he is a transsexual is true. What a screwed up young man in a screwed up country.

Kirk, who was an exceptional young White family man, was a casualty of a yet-to-be clearly declared war.

Sam Dickson: September 11, 2025 at 11:31 pm ...The Soros funded District Attorney refused to prosecute [Antifa] because she said she had ideological sympathies which prevented her from doing so and, besides, she said, “I have better things to do.” … As Comrade Johnson says, these people hate us. They want us DEAD. We cannot live with them.

Thank you, Sam. That settles it when both you and Greg agree that racial separation is the only solution. Our side has only racially responsible Whites — but not all Whites are on our side. WE MUST ORGANIZE AND SEPARATE FROM NON-WHITES, WITHOUT THOSE LOST KINSMEN. They are choosing the wrong side in the racial struggle.

CC Reader: September 13, 2025 The only people I see incoming MLK are conservatives, so called…

When will C-C readers finally ditch conservatism from the likes of Charlie Kirk? See Greg Johnson’s “Why Conservatives STILL Can’t Win” at counter-currents.com.

The core of [William] Pierce’s argument is that conservatives can’t win because they aren’t really trying. The left play for keeps. They have an overriding goal. They have a world to win… Conservatives may fight ferociously from time to time, but they are always playing defense… Other things being equal, the side that fights to win will defeat the side that fights for a draw. Fortune favors the bold, those who launch offenses, not those who merely play defense… Conservatives also make a virtual cult out of being good sports, graceful losers, and ready compromisers.

Good sports like Kirk, but losers!

He matured a lot in only the last five years or so… noticing a lot of stuff about the greatest ally, he came a long way and MUCH younger than many of us, and with a huge megaphone. A truly great man.
—

Mr. Kirk got a lot of face time in Jew-controlled mass media, yes, especially so-called conservative FOX News, with his giant pro-Israel megaphone, but he compromised with our enemy, Jewry, and worshipped our enemy’s imaginary god, promoting their deity’s mythical son Jesus like a side-show barker.

Many conservatives do that. None of them are truly great men for our race. They compromise with our greatest enemy.

Having been a “truth activist” for more than a dozen years Kirk should have noticed and confirmed a “lot more stuff” about the shitty little ally in the last five years or so than he let on to his followers.

Bibi Netanyahohoo has already stated after the assassination, “Charlie Kirk [was] a lion-hearted friend of Israel, he fought the lies and stood tall for Judeo-Christian civilization.”

What lies did he fight?

Dave Chambers: September 12, 2025 Spencer is correct… I think in this case that it is obvious that Kirk would WANT right-wingers to use his death in order to fight the Left.
—

Being neither a right-winger nor of the Left, nor a conservative, but a racial preservationist, I find Spencer’s suggestion that Charlie Kirk become some sort of martyr for Whites that MLK is to Blacks, as absurd.

As racially responsible Whites let’s get serious and recognize and honor a true leader of our people, arguably the best of the second half of the 20th century, as did his biographer, Dr. Robert Griffin, did in “William Pierce: A Reminiscence” at nationalvanguard.org

Of course there was his intelligence. Simply, he was the brightest person I’ve ever been around… And there was his character. I found him to be a man of great integrity; there was the tightest fit imaginable between what he most deeply believed and the way he conducted his life. He had enormous commitment and dedication and perseverance. Day after day, year after year, decade after decade, he marched on. And he had courage. He put himself on the line. He went public; he used his own name. And he was incredibly hard working… I won’t be silent or controlled by fear, not now, not after knowing him. I seek to live with the courage he demonstrated. I want, in my own unique way, to live as he lived, as an honorable White man. Dr. Pierce was an honorable White man.

Spencer Quinn: September 13, 2025 Will, you are thinking honestly, while I’m thinking tactically…
---

Thank you, Spencer. I was raised by my parents to tell the truth and always have heard that honesty is the best policy.

Wherever you use the word “Left” I substitute the word Jewry. To have a strategy is important, but whose strategy?

Bibi ‘the butcher” Netanyahoo liked Charlie Kirk becaus Kirk was a Christian Zionist who put Israel first, ahead of his own race. Bibi had recently invited Kirk to Israel and is disappointed that he was assassinated before he could have visited his Middle Eastern “Holy Land” to talk strategy. Kirk would have been comfortable in a meeting, described here in which the <ahem!> “Left’s” strategy was “Always do what is good for Jews” See: “25 Senators in Secret Meeting With Jewish Leaders to Plot Strategy Against Growing Anger Over Influence of Jewish Elites” at nationalvanguard.com

ON JUNE 5, 16 heads of Jewish organizations joined 25 Democratic senators in a private meeting, which, according to the Times of Israel, is an annual event. All of the Jewish organizations but one were openly declared advocates for Israel and are supportive of its policies. Key groups present included the Council of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, the Anti-Defamation League, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. A number of the groups have lobbied Congress and the White House in support of the use of force against Iran, a position that is basically identical to the demands being made by the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The senatorial delegation was headed by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), currently Senate minority leader who has described himself as the “shomer” or guardian of Israel in the Senate. The 25 senators in attendance constitute one-quarter of the entire deliberative body and more than half of all Democrats serving in it. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who has emphatically linked her campaign to become the Democratic presidential nominee in 2020 to Jewish and Israeli interests, chaired the gathering.

After the meeting, Jewish Insider provided a complete list of the participants and also a diagram of how they were positioned in the Capitol Hill conference room. The senators were placed on one side of a rectangle with the Jewish leaders in front of them filling the seats on the other three sides. Who exactly provided the agenda that Klobuchar was presumably following is not known, but one suspects that it may have been a joint effort by Schumer and several of the more prominent Jewish organization participants.

The meeting was by design not a public event, and, to a certain extent, it was a secret. Its time, place, and participants were not announced, and it was only reported at all in the Israeli and Jewish media. According to after-the-fact coverage of the event by Alison Weir of the “If Americans Knew” website, even staffers in the congressional offices were not aware that the meeting was taking place.

No statement was issued afterwards, but it is believed that the principal topic under discussion was how to contain and reverse pro- Palestinian sentiment among progressive Democratic voters, who, to the horror of the participants, actually have been embracing the possibility that Palestinians are human beings with plausibly the same rights as Israelis. A particular focus would have been the nonviolent Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS), which has become a growing force on college campuses and in progressive circles.

Other issues raised were mentioned in passing afterwards on the email service “The Tell” by Ron Kampeas of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) news service. They included supporting Israel and also more federal-level legislation to combat “anti-Semitism.” And, of course, there was the issue of money. Several groups want funding from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) increased to pay for more security at Jewish facilities. Current legislation is considering allocating $70 million per year and there were demands that it be increased to $90 million. A 2014 article in the Jewish Forward reported that Jewish institutions received 94% of DHS discretionary funding.

One might reasonably argue that the private meeting with the Democratic senators reflects a singular urgency in that the party base is becoming notably less pro-Israel, suggesting that something had to be done to stop the rot. That may be true enough, but the reality is that the federal government’s pandering to Israel is both bi-partisan and global in its reach. The United States uniquely has a special envoy to combat anti-Semitism, and his writ extends to proposing sanctions against countries that are critics of Israel.

And even as the Democrats were meeting with Jewish leaders, the Republicans were doing much the same thing. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met with probably some of those very same leaders as the Democrats and expressed concern about the possibility that British Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn might become prime minister. Corbyn has been targeted by British Jews because he is the first UK senior politician to speak sympathetically about the plight of the Palestinians.

Pompeo was asked, if Corbyn “is elected, would you be willing to work with us to take action if life becomes very difficult for Jews in the UK?” He replied: “It could be that Mr. Corbyn manages to run the gauntlet and get elected. It’s possible. You should know, we won’t wait for him to do those things to begin to push back. We will do our level best. It’s too risky and too important and too hard once it’s already happened.”

So American Jews want to join with their British counterparts to either bring down or contain a top-level elected politician just because he recognizes the suffering of the Palestinians. The American secretary of state meets with those same activists and agrees with them that something must be done, to include quite possibly taking steps to ensure that he does not become prime minister in the first place.

Recall for the moment that Britain is America’s closest ally and is what passes for a democracy these days. Jews obviously occupy a rather special space, politically speaking, in the United States. One might reasonably ask, where are the private meetings with representatives of Italian, German, Irish, or Polish organizations, each of which represents a far greater portion of America’s ethnic mix than do Jews? The obvious answer is that those groups do not operate in a cohesive, tribal fashion and they do not possess the financial resources that the 600 or so Jewish groups that advocate for Israel have. In America, unfortunately, money buys access to power and, if there is enough money on the table, it can also buy politicians.

Nor are America’s White ethnic groups as grievance-driven.

And there is one other significant difference: While other ethnic groups in the United States are protective of their respective cultures and languages, there is no sense that any of them actually seek to advocate policies damaging to the United States to benefit the foreign nations that they identify with. The Jewish advocacy for Israel is something quite different, costing the American taxpayer billions of dollars every year and involving Washington in a sequence of wars of choice driven by Israel itself aided by its powerful domestic lobby.

Israel also comes with a price tag in terms of the constitutional rights enjoyed by Americans. Before too long, legislation currently working its way through Congress will criminalize any criticism of Israel. No other national or ethnic group in the United States seeks to dismantle the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States in quite that fashion.

Israel is no friend and never has been. Recent media reports detail how Jewish-American oligarch Paul Singer has been working with the Israeli government to transfer thousands of high-paying American IT jobs to Israel. Is he guilty of dual loyalty? No, he is only really loyal to Israel, as are many of the Jewish leaders who met with Pompeo and the senators. It is a disgrace.

And it is also a disgrace that Pompeo and 25 Democratic Party senators should be meeting privately with Jewish organizations to do things for Israel and the Jewish community that do not serve the interests of all Americans, up to and including meddling in the politics of a genuine close ally to respond to the paranoia of British Jews.

Yes, there is a Jewish international conspiracy in place directed by some Jews like those who met with the senators and Pompeo, and it has no off switch. Never before in history has a great power been so dominated by a puny client state and its domestic fifth.

column, and it is time that the private meetings whereby a government “of the people, by the people and for the people” panders to one group alone should end forever.

Tell us, Spencer, is your strategy for White preservation anything like Jewry’s strategy to maintain Jewish control of the American government?

Captain John Charity Spring MA: September 13, 2025 Left right distinctions make no sense regarding Senate Shomer Chuck Schumer. Was Tyler Robinson also identifiable as a Zionist during his youth? He was brought up Mormon.

Tyler couldn’t help how he was raised until he was older.

Morons, er uh, Mormons, are a little different than most Christian denominations, but their church’s name still says it all: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Tyler Robinson’s dad was stupid to share his son’s confession with a preacher; he should have called the FBI himself and claimed the $100,000 reward. If his son is to fight the lynch mob in court to avoid the death penalty, $100,000 might at least initially retain top defense specialists. Other donations will pour in later like they have for Luigi Mangione.

You’re right, Captain. Chuckie Shomer doesn’t care at all about Left vs. Right designations, only about what’s good for Jewry and Israel. Nor should serious White separatists/preservationists care about Left vs Right distractions — only about preservation of our unique race and the destruction of shomers who threaten our welfare and survival.

THINK RACIALLY – ACT LOCALLY

Uncle Semantic, responding to me: September 13, 2025 “There’s nothing wrong with being nice, but Whites’ love of other races must stop without apologies to anyone.”

That’s all well and good, mass separation being an absolute essential, but where is the volcanic anger unleashed as counter-brutality just one fucking time against these feral black bastards? Or is the White way just to lock it all away to the point of suicide? I’m tired of seeing it all every day and not one White man so much as beating the living shit out of a spook in retaliation.

I feel your rage, Unc. Especially after having Miss Iryna’s senseless murder at the hand of the savage nigger rubbed in our faces last week. There are limits to niceness and that incident alone, caught on video, crossed that line for many. What to do about it, we ask? Very little in what appears to be our terminally mixed race society.

Some Whites will say, “To hell with giving that Black animal a ‘fair trial’ — bring back lyinching — that’s proper justice.”

I was talking with former Order member Richard Scutari, Friday. He’s finally living relatively free now after serving 38 years in federal cages for a victimless crime — much of that time spent in solitary confinement because he would not “flip” and cooperate with JOG against his brothers. His loyalty is his honor.

He asked me, “Will, do you see a civil war on the horizon?”

I answered, “We’re already in one, Richard; it’s racial. Neither side wnts to rule the other as in civil wars. A few sserious, racially responsible Whites who fight to separate racially on one side and everybody else on the other, with many Whites choosing the orher side.”

You’re ahead of the game, Unc, with your stated solution: “mass separation being an absolute essential.” Don’t just strike out in anger at the other side, channel that rage — organize with sober, like-minded Whites who are determined to separate from the nigger mess as well as from Whites who go along with it. It’s not that difficult at the family and community level for starters.

Richard’s Bruder Schweigen (Silent Brotherhood), though imperfect, planted a seed of resistance. You’ll have to read between the lines in this Jewish hate group’s piece to better understand Richard: Neo-Nazi Order member released from prison after radicalizing terrorist group.