Commenting on Counter-Currents site

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sun Aug 24, 2025 7:37 pm

Promoting Wolf Stoner's essay that actually appeared on C-C: https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/na ... is-week-1/ Let's discuss nationalism vs "the state" that has allowed the loss of White Americans' nation.



Will Williams: August 25, 2025
Americans are competing with 55 million legal immigrants on visas – to say nothing of the tens of millions of foreigners who have gotten citizenship and the tens of millions of illegal immigrants…
---

That is an incredible stat for “Nationalism this week,” Greg. White Americans have lost their nation. The most relevant C-C essay this year may have been Wolf Stoner’s “The State vs. the Nation” from back in February.

Modern states and ethnic/racial interests have nothing in common. The last true ethnic state was annihilated 80 years ago. The whole modern globalist system is built on denial of white identity. Therefore, everyone who serves the interests of the state, automatically promotes and abets this anti-white agenda. Proceeding from this understanding, our goal must be to disengage from the state as much as possible. The state isn’t something holy; it is only an instrument that is supposed to be in the hands of an ethnos. When this instrument, for some reason, ceases to be useful, or even becomes harmful, it must be replaced. The state is nothing; the race is everything. The state must serve the race’s interests, not the other way around.

The laughable tendency of many white [lower case] Americans to worship the state and its symbols, like the flag
, is utterly counterproductive. It allows our enemies to manipulate public opinion in any direction. It is enough to proclaim gravely on TV that “the interests of the United States” require such and such measures and a gullible crowd instantly approves anything, even openly criminal infringement on civil freedoms (as after 2001 under the Bush administration). The main problem of modern whites [lower case] is their loss of a healthy ethnic mentality, under which everything would be evaluated from a position of “what does this mean for my people?”

I did not win any points with white [lower case] Americans when I “disrespected” the American flag, explained here “An Experience with the VFW” at nationalvanguard.org:

… After the meal and after the hat had been passed around the long table for donations, the first official business was to stand and salute the American flag — once to the one in the center of the hall, along with the women; then, after the wives were excused, again to another flag in the partitioned room with the vets. Out of respect for the attendees I stood, but neither saluted or put my hand over my heart, nor mouthed the familiar Pledge of Allegiance. Following the second ritual pledge the leader of the group led everyone in reciting the familiar Lord’s Prayer. I remained standing, but did not bow my head and close my eyes. Instead, I was looking around the room to see if anyone else had his eyes open and was not reciting the prayer. My eyes met another SF vet’s eyes which was encouraging. Everyone else had their eyes shut, heads bowed, reciting the prayer.

I think someone must have told the old fellow at the head of the table who officiated that I hadn’t saluted the flag at that earlier meeting I’d attended — or perhaps he was told that I headed National Alliance, and “Googled” us to find the WikiJews’ scary description — because as soon at the prayer was concluded and we had taken our seats, he announced: “I want to make clear that anyone here who does not salute our flag is not welcome.” Everyone except me had saluted the flag, so my hand shot up with, “I did not salute the flag.” Someone asked, “Why?”

I answered loud and clear, verbatim: “Because this country has turned to sh__ and that flag represents the country.”

Did that take courage? No, unless telling that roomful of white veterans of foreign wars what is true, and is what I believe is an example of moral courage. They needed someone to stand and tell them that when questioned. I was not there to make friends.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sun Aug 24, 2025 10:43 pm

I comment on someting I know well about, lawfare against White advocates: https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/a- ... n-lawfare/



Will Williams: August 25, 2025
Richard Chance: August 23, 2025 The right’s failure to recognize lawfare and fight it with its own version of it is one of our biggest downfalls. It’s amazing we’ve gotten this far while simultaneously allowing the legal system to run roughshod over us with hardly any pushback.
---

Wrong! First, Richard, if you’re interested in the law, cease identifying with the so-called “right.” We are serious White race loyalists, not “rightists.”

Earliest example I can think of is Tom Metzger being sued over some dead immigrant’s murder that he had nothing to do with. I’m not saying he would have definitely won, but the lack of legal resources there guaranteed that he wouldn’t.
---

Tom was a log-time friend. He foolishly chose to represent himself against barrator Morris Dees and his so-called “law center” in one of Dees’s patented vicariouus liability lawsuits, holding Tom liable for the acts of some far away skinheads who had killed an Ethiopian nigger, claiming Tom was their leader.

Nonsense, but with SPLC’s influence at the time in the justice system and with Jew-controlled media in its corner, won a multi-million dollar judgment, as it had done with Aryan Nations and various other pro-White groups. Tom lost his home and more — but kept going, evolving, courageously exposing Jewish perfidy to the end. Read, here “Remembering Tom Metzger (1938-2020)” at nationalvanguard.org.

I had the honor of being invited to the 88th birthday celebration of August Klapprott (4 September 1994), at his home in Myrtle Beach, SC. He was one of the 30 defendants in the infamous 1944 Sedition lawfare trial that’s referenced in this article. A negative biography of him, is here:
Nazis in New Jersey: August Klapprott & Camp Nordland : Brian A. Smith, D.C. : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

I have been a victim of protracted government lawfare, tied up for years and incarcerated three times for a phony criminal misdemeanor, in an effort to destroy the National Alliance, since I was its chairman. The SPLC was heavily involved in the prosecution of my case.

I and NA survived the lawfare campaign. How we did it is explained in the book I and my wife wrote after the ordeal. You and other aspiring racial activists might find it instructive, even entertaining. We can fight back and expose the crooked justice system! “Pocahontas Show Trial by William W. Williams” at cosmotheistchurch.org

That disgusting Negress creature that falsely persecuted VDare belongs in prison for her abuse of the judicial system. Perhaps Donald Trump will see to that?
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sun Aug 24, 2025 11:11 pm

A good opportunity to promote yesterday's excellent ADV: https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/co ... st-no-650/ Racial separation is essential to survival!



Will Williams: August 25, 2025
Boreal Daresay: August 25, 2025 Concerning evolution: There is a big controversy going on in that world, the evidence is mounting that evolution is actually purposeful and not at all “random” as believed in the current paradigm.
---

What's the controversy? You may be interested in yesterday’s American Dissident Voices broadcast on the subject. “Without Racial Separation There Could be No Life at All” at nationalvanguard.org

Evolution is real. Evolution is not only real, it is a fundamental, necessary, aspect of life — in fact, without evolution, living things as we know them could not exist.

And racial divergence and separation are themselves essential parts of evolution. Without racial separation, therefore, there could be no life at all. Does this sound like an extreme conclusion, unwarranted by the evidence? Is it contrary to science and to the morals held by all good people? Or is it a simple truth, the realization of which can change the minds and hearts of our people, and put them on the right path once again?

It’s astounding that a century and a half after Darwin, this is still controversial. So much nonsense is written on the subject that I think the best way to approach it is from an entirely new angle….

Read more at the link.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Mon Aug 25, 2025 10:51 pm


I hit Miss Kim with one of my favorite, hard-hitting headlines from Dr. Pierce, in two parts so the C-C software won't block it for being too long: https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/wh ... ve-heroes/



Will Williams: August 26, 2025
Kim: August 25, 2025 Mr. Williams, thank goodness for free speech here at Counter-Currents. I have to tell you that I can’t be a member of NV, nor can I make a large donation to NV, because of your my-way-or-the-highway viewpoint(s). ALL WNs agree, race first. This should be sufficient, because many White Americans were baptized Christian, or were raised in culturally Christian homes as children.
---


“My way or the highway”? Ha! I’ve always said NA is not for everyone, but for the few, the very few at this stage in the racial revolution. It is not for you.

You don’t pay very close attention, Kim. National Vanguard is merely the online magazine for the National Alliance. People do not send donations to our magazine, only to the organization William Pierce founded more than 50 years ago. Kevin Strom maintains our Websites and hosts our weekly radio show, American Dissident Voices. I pay Kevin’s salary to do that for the Alliance..

I’m a big fan of WLP’s work, but I happen to disagree with Dr. Pierce’s unique religious/spiritual beliefs.


That’s unusual since there is a consistent Cosmotheist thread that runs through nearly everything he wrote or recorded.


You seem to think, I must accept everything he said, or I do not really appreciate him. No. As with all religions, theologies, philosophies, there’s stuff I agree with, & stuff I don’t agree with. And I believe this is true for a large swath of White nationalists.
---

You and I would do better to not discuss Dr. Pierce’s beliefs, though you say you’re a big fan of his.

You’ve got what Pierce called “spiritual baggage,” as does that “large swath of White nationalists” you mention.

I know that when there are more Whites who understand Pierce’s philosophy and embrace it than there are Whites whose beliefs are all over the board — unfocused — as they are presently, our racial struggle will be half won.

Imagine Jews not having their “us vs. them”cohesive ideology. Then imagine Whites having it, based on Pierce’s unique separatist racial philosophy.

Kim, you think I am mean and hard and crude. Maybe you’re right. I have always been a fighter, not a writer. I follow Pierce, the writer.

But I was baptized a Presbyterian. What went wrong with me? Why don’t I accept the mythical Jew Jesus as my personal savior? Pierce was also a baptized Presbyterian. What went wrong with him? Why didn’t he go along with the Christian herd?

You seem to think Dr. Pierce was more genteel and reasonable than I. You’re right about that. He was a genuine gentleman; but, he was as serious as a heart attack when it came to preserving our race and it comes through clearly to some of us in his Nature-based, scientifically evaluated Cosmotheism. It takes a very dim view of Christianity to those who pay close attention.

Note this from him 24 years ago: “To Be, or To Be Nice” at nationalvanguard.org.

by Dr. William L. Pierce

… I have reported to you from time to time on the situations in Rhodesia, now officially known as “Zimbabwe,” and in South Africa. It is depressing to me to talk about these things. It is depressing to me to see the predictions that I made long ago coming true. And it has been even more depressing than usual recently as the deterioration of conditions in those countries has accelerated, as the ultimate horror that I predicted has become visible.

Two weeks ago, we talked about the growing phenomenon of the gang rape of White women by Blacks in South Africa. It has been a little over a year, however, since we talked about the seizure and looting of White farms in Rhodesia and the killing of White farm families there by mobs of Blacks. President for Life Robert Mugabe wanted to enhance his popularity among his followers by taking land away from White farmers and giving it to Blacks. When he began this activity Mugabe had to use a certain degree of caution for two reasons. First, virtually all the agricultural product of Rhodesia came from the White farms; Blacks engaged only in subsistence farming, and White farms that were turned over to Blacks essentially went out of production, weakening the country’s economy. Second, a substantial portion of White Rhodesians were British citizens, and the British government was protesting the dispossession and mistreatment of its citizens.

It soon became clear to Mugabe, however, that the British government of Prime Minister Tony Blair really didn’t care what happened to Rhodesia’s Whites and that the government’s protests were merely empty words. Furthermore, as the Rhodesian economy, badly damaged by the earlier seizures of White farms, sank further toward chaos, jobless Blacks clamored for even more White land. A government of reasonable men might have salvaged the Rhodesian economy by a combination of austerity measures and strict law enforcement, but that is not the African way. The African way — more generally, the Black way is to kill the goose and get all the golden eggs now. So Mugabe, in order to maintain his popularity, has continued to let the mobs of jobless Blacks seize White farms and despoil them.

The process is now spiraling out of control. Last week a group of White farmers fought their way through a mob of squatters who were attacking a White farm. They rescued the besieged White farmer, but they injured a number of the Black squatters while doing it. The Mugabe government in turn arrested 23 of the White farmers who had been involved in the rescue, denied them bond, and threw them into prison in chains, where they now are at the tender mercies of Black jailers.

It is mid-winter in Rhodesia, and the unheated prison cells where the White farmers are being held are freezing. When three jailers in the prison responded to a request from the Whites for blankets, Mugabe promptly had the jailers themselves arrested. The Whites are not to be “coddled,” he announced, sending a clear message to the other jailers and to policemen that Whites could be abused with impunity. Mugabe has, in effect, declared all White Rhodesians to be outlaws. Blacks may attack them and steal their property, and they may not attempt to protect themselves. In order to make things perfectly clear, last Saturday Mugabe’s second-in-command, Vice President Joseph Msika, announced: “Whites are not human beings.” In the past year only nine White farmers have been murdered by Blacks during the seizures of White farms, but the death toll is now certain to increase rapidly.

Also last Saturday, Mugabe steeply increased his goal for the dispossession of Whites when he revealed a new plan calling for 95 per cent of all White farmland in Rhodesia to be turned over to Blacks. That, on top of the imprisonment of the 23 White farmers, caused a mass exodus of White families from farms in the area of northern Rhodesia where mobs of Black squatters have been most active recently. Three hundred women and children were evacuated from 130 White farms over the weekend, and more than 60 of those farms already have been invaded and ransacked by squatters, who routinely slaughter all pet cats and dogs left behind, carry off everything of value, even ripping out bathtubs and other plumbing fixtures, and destroy the rest. White evacuees in the town of Chinhoyi were attacked on the streets by Blacks, and White women who attempted to take food and warm clothing to their imprisoned husbands were beaten outside the prison.

And the controlled media here are silent. The politicians are silent. The Christian ministers, who used to preach crusades against Rhodesia when it was a White country, are silent. The various bleeding-heart types, who are terribly distressed over what AIDS is doing to the Black population of Africa and always are running around organizing international conferences and lobbying the government to provide more medical assistance to AIDS-stricken Blacks, are silent.

The media bosses are silent because they are happy with the present situation. This is the way they planned it. The politicians and most of the rest are silent because they really don’t care. Those who are a little uncomfortable about the stepped-up genocide being waged against Whites in Rhodesia are afraid to say anything lest they be accused of “White racism.” Everyone with any sense at all of Political Correctness understands that any expression of concern or sympathy for White people engaged in a conflict with Blacks is racist. The details are irrelevant: in any racial conflict, one must support the non-White side in order to be Politically Correct. It doesn’t matter what the Blacks are doing to the Whites: if you complain about it, you will be accused of racism.

I’ve seen this happen many times. My organization, the National Alliance, distributes leaflets and stickers with the message, “Earth’s most endangered species: the White race help preserve it,” and then our address. That’s all: no mention of Blacks, Jews, racial conflict, or anything else, just a call for concern about preserving our own kind. And yet every time we distribute this message, the news media begin shrieking hysterically about “racism” and “hate”: every time. Some of our “Earth’s most endangered species” stickers show up in a school or on a university campus or posted on traffic signs in a community, and the local media people begin shrieking about “hate propaganda” and urge local citizens to call the police if they see one of our stickers.

The big Jewish media bosses have everyone who works for the media, Gentile as well as Jew, so thoroughly conditioned, so thoroughly indoctrinated with anti-White propaganda, that any expression of concern for White people is denounced immediately as “hate” and “racism.” I’ll guarantee you, if the White Rhodesians were mopping up the Blacks over there, running the last of them out of the country and reclaiming their farms, there would be non-stop anti-Rhodesian coverage on every television news program in America and in Britain. There would be calls from the politicians in the Congress for our government to send in the U.S. Army to save the Blacks and punish the wicked White Rhodesians. A strict embargo on all trade with Rhodesia already would have been imposed. That idiot we have in the White House wouldn’t have to study the matter the way he did before issuing a statement on stem cell research; the Jews would have him on television immediately denouncing the Rhodesians and threatening grim reprisals. And his British counterpart, Tony Blair, would be shaking his fist and foaming at the mouth as he raved against the evils of “White racism.”…

continued at the link
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Mon Aug 25, 2025 11:00 pm

Continued to show how mean and crude Dr. Pierce could be when it comes to preserving our race. https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/wh ... ve-heroes/ Either we be, or we be nice.



Will Williams: August 26, 2025
"To Be, or To Be Nice" at nationalvanguard.org by William Pierce -- continued for you, Kim

And do you know what the British and U.S. governments have done to discourage Mugabe in his current war against the White population of Rhodesia? The Brits are threatening not to let their cricket team play in Rhodesia when it goes on tour next year. Last week the U.S. Senate passed something called the “Zimbabwe Democracy and Recovery Act.” It couples additional monetary handouts from the U.S. Treasury for various programs in Rhodesia to visa restrictions on those charged with violent repression of civil rights. Visa restrictions! That’s what’s supposed to make Mugabe behave himself!

Of course, there’s no hint in the “Zimbabwe Democracy and Recovery Act” of the genocide being waged against White Rhodesians. Really, the whole idea of the thing is to provide money for the so-called “democratic opposition” to Mugabe’s dictatorship: money to finance Black democrats, not to save White Rhodesians. Even so, the whole business is being handled very quietly, lest the media make a fuss about it and claim that it’s a “racist” act because by helping Mugabe’s opponents it may help the White farmers. But really, there’s no danger of the media making a fuss about it because the last thing the Jewish media bosses want to do is alert the White lemmings here about what’s going on in Rhodesia.

Well, as I said earlier, I don’t like to talk about what’s going on in Rhodesia and in South Africa, and believe me, what’s happening in Rhodesia now will be happening in South Africa soon. It depresses me to talk about this. I talk about it because it is a powerful lesson for us. It was only a few years ago that both of these countries were White countries. They were good, decent places for our people to live. I knew South Africans and Rhodesians. They were better people, on the average, than White Americans: better looking, healthier, better racially, better genetically. They had a small problem with Black terrorists, but it was a small problem. Fewer Rhodesians and South Africans were killed each year by Black terrorists than were killed in traffic accidents. Many, many more died each year from smoking cigarettes than from fighting a bush war against Black communists such as Robert Mugabe. And yet both countries now are under Black rule and are sinking rapidly into savagery and chaos.

How did it happen? The short answer is that it happened because both countries were persuaded to commit collective race suicide. I knew Rhodesians more than 20 years ago, before they all decided to commit suicide. I have known South Africans both before and after their collective suicide in 1993. They had some weaknesses that I noticed from the beginning. For one thing they were far too strongly under the influence of their churches and of Christian doctrine. This was especially true of the Afrikaners, the Boers, but I also noticed it to a lesser extent among Rhodesians and among the English portion, the Anglican portion, of the South African population. The Christian churches trained every Black terrorist leader in Rhodesia and in South Africa, but this fact seemed to make no impression on the Whites there. The churches were a part of White society. The Whites believed the churches were on their side: White, Christian civilization versus Black savagery and superstition, that sort of thing. Even after the churches betrayed them to their enemies, most of them still believed that.

Well, actually, there was more to the psychological weakness of the Whites than subversive Christian “brotherhood” teaching. In a sense, the Whites were too civilized, too genteel. I used to tell my South African visitors, “It may be that the Black terrorists are no real military threat to you, but the only viable long-range solution for you is to get rid of all the Blacks and other non-Whites in your country. Do whatever you must do: force them out, sterilize them, kill them — otherwise you will lose your country. Of course, it was easy for me to say that and much harder for the South Africans to implement it, with their economy making such extensive use of Black labor. There would have been very tough economic, political, and diplomatic problems to solve.

But the negative reactions of my South African guests to my advice went beyond these practical difficulties, beyond their reluctance to give up their Black gardeners and cooks and cleaning women and their reluctance to face the economic problems of restructuring their economy to use White labor only. They were shocked by my advice. Most of them, I believe, regarded Blacks as fellow human beings who were merely at a lower stage of development and still needed guidance and help from Whites. “Blacks are like children,” they told me. “They need our help, and most Blacks know that. They know that they are better off under our guidance than they would be without it. That’s why we don’t have to worry about their ever trying to take over our government and run it themselves. They know that they need us. It’s only a few terrorists who are a problem, and we can deal with the terrorists.”

You know, that sounds a lot like the sort of foolishness that I used to hear from my fellow Southerners back in the 1950s and even into the 1960s. None of the Southerners with whom I discussed the matter believed that Blacks were equal in intelligence to Whites or in their ability to build or to maintain a civilization, but they could not quite bring themselves to regard Blacks as vermin to be eradicated. That just wasn’t Christian. And even those who were relatively free of Christian influences felt that I was going too far. “Help the Blacks along,” they told me. “Make a few concessions to them, show them that we aren’t interested in oppressing them, and they will behave themselves. They will see that it is in their interest not to wreck the society that has given them so much more than they could obtain on their own. We can’t just exterminate them or force them all to go back to Africa. That would be barbaric. That would be stooping to their level.”

Foolishness. Suicidal foolishness. We really have become too civilized and have forgotten one of Nature’s most basic rules: Two different types of animal cannot permanently occupy exactly the same ecological niche. One eventually must drive the other into extinction. That is what is happening now in southern Africa. And in fact, it also is happening in America.

We accept the truth of this when other species are involved. Why is it so difficult for many of us to apply the rule to ourselves as well? Why do some of us believe that it is un-civilized or un-genteel to deal with our race problem in a rational way?

I’m sure that everyone has heard the propaganda slogan promoted by the Jewish media and their collaborators to the effect that racists are made, not born. The Politically Correct party line is that children are born without any racial feelings or predispositions at all, and that if we don’t teach them to be racists, they will grow up loving everyone equally, and that will be a desirable state of affairs. That’s the way to avoid racial conflict, and so we should be very careful to shield our children from any influences that might make racists of them.

Well, for one thing that propaganda is based on a lie. And for another thing the lie is calculated to weaken us and to hasten our annihilation. The fact is that children, while not born with an explicit set of opinions about racial matters, are born with a strong tendency to regard their own kind as friend and those who are not their kind as foe. To this extent, racism does not require deliberate tutelage. Children become racists, which is to say, they develop a strong preference for their own kind, through a natural process known as “imprinting” very early in life. Nature gave us this tendency because it is a survival trait. We developed the trait over millions of years of evolution, because those of us who had it were more likely to survive than those who didn’t have it. And the media bosses and their allies, who are saturating us with the lie that racism is unnatural and evil, don’t want us to survive.

If you want to read more about the evolutionary basis of so-called “racism,” I recommend that you read some of the works of the very distinguished anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith, especially his book A New Theory of Human Evolution. It’s a bit hard to find these days because it’s Politically Incorrect and has been purged from many libraries that formerly carried it. Sir Arthur Keith was a very civilized and genteel man, but he also was a perceptive and honest student of Nature.

As for me, I make no pretensions to gentility. I tend to be crude and simple and direct. Sir Arthur Keith explains it all in very polite terms, but I say it simply this way: If we want our kind to survive on this planet longer than another generation or two, then we must clear the cobwebs of Christian superstition and Jewish propaganda from our minds and face the facts without being squeamish. One fact is that we must have exclusive possession of those portions of this planet that constitute suitable habitat for us. Another fact is that in order to obtain and maintain that exclusive possession, we must be prepared to kill, to annihilate, any and all competitors. A third fact is that racism is God’s gift to any race that wants to survive. Racism is healthy and natural and essential, and we had damned well better clear of minds of the Judaeo-Christian lie that it is evil and wicked and nasty and low-brow.

To sum it up, the law of life is: kill or die.
That’s still the law, no matter how civilized and genteel we become. We do not invalidate the law by wearing the latest fashions, by being computer whizzes, and by attending very polite tea parties. The law does not say, of course, that we cannot cooperate with our kind, that we cannot collaborate constructively with other members of our own race. It does not say that we cannot design and build a society in which we can work and play and breed and live at peace, more or less, with other White people. Not at peace all the time, but most of the time: enough of the time to still continue building and developing and improving our civilization, and, make no mistake about this, it is our civilization and no one else’s.

But the law of life does tell us that if we believe that being nice to members of other races will persuade them to be nice to us, then we are on the way out, just like the Rhodesians. It does tell us that if we deal with Blacks and mestizos and Asians under the assumption that they are like us because they have learned to speak English and to mimic our manners, or that they have the same aspirations and ideals and standards and values and way of looking at the world that we do, then we will doom our posterity to oblivion. If we take the paternalistic attitude, as the South Africans did and as many American Southerners did, that the Blacks are like children, whom we should protect and promote and assist, and think that they will appreciate our help, then the fate of our race will be that of the dodo…


More at the link.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Tue Aug 26, 2025 9:49 pm

Some fun with popular C-C commenter, Peter: https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/if ... s-a-loser/


Will Williams: August 27, 2025
Peter Quint: August 27, 2025 They’ll watch Schindler’s list and it won’t even register as something to care about, they’ll just stare back blankly.


If they can look up from their phones long enough, that is.

Maybe they’ll learn it’s just more Jewish Hollywood propaganda, based on a novel.
…. When I was in grade school we went on a field trip to watch Gone With The Wind at a local theatre, but that was back in the 60’s—I bet they don’t do that anymore.


Safe bet. “Local theaters”? they’ll ask, like telephone booths. “What are they?”
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:08 pm

Can any white (lower case) Christian losers effectively debate with a dedicated Cosmotheist? https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/if ... s-a-loser/ That is the question. William Pierce gave us the answer for those with the ears to hear it.



Will Williams: August 28, 2025
WU: August 27, 2025 …[S]ome Christian Zionists will claim that the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Palestinians are “not real Christians” by Protestant standards, and thus there is no need for American evangelical Christians to worry about their well-being.
---

Our people, White people, are European — Aryans — not Semites or middle-Easterners. Christianity is not grounded in reality, so any Whites, whatever denomination, claiming to be “real Christians” are worshipping the mythical deity of Jews, our racial enemies. They can deny that fact but it is a fact.

Until we free ourselves from this alien spirituality Whites will be slaves to Jewish masters. Fact!
Perhaps it’s a matter of perspective, of what one pays attention to. If someone only sees Nick Fuentes’ army of gremlins and their resounding “ratios” and “raising awareness” about the JQ, then he would be forgiven for thinking that big changes are happening and Zionists are on the back foot, certainly as far as the fight for hearts and minds is concerned. I disagree with those who say “the internet is not real life”, but it’s important to give things their proper measure [The Internet is virtual and AI is artificial] …

If on one side of the battlefield stand the Groypers and podcasters who are “just asking questions”, on the other side is amassed every single evangelical Christian, united under the command of Zionist zealots like pastor John Hagee. Christians United for Israel (CUFI) has over 10 million members.
---

Angelo, you have just described the folks, white or not, that will have chosen the losing side when it comes to preservation of the White race. Non-Christian White separatists, though small in number presently, will be the winners.

Why worry about what superstitious, gullible Christians have to say? John Hagee? Really? Nick Fuentes? Really? Isn’t he the rising young Internet star who has claimed that when his faction of bullshitters takes over all non-Christians will be exterminated, or some such shit?

Jesus F. Christ!
…[T]he facts Albrecht, Costello, and van de Camp present in their pieces are true. It is true that more people are publicly objecting to Israel’s butchering of civilians in Gaza. It is true that more Americans are noticing and unhappy with the United States’ bizarre devotion to Israel. It is true that younger generations aren’t as fond of Israel as their elders…

White Americans, young and old, should get their heads out of their asses and quit worrying about Jewish and American genocide of Gazans — that is not our fight — and vigorously protest in a sound, organized manner the stranglehold organized Jewry has on the mass mind of America through its ownership and control of the news and entertainment industry, Madison Avenue, Wall Street, the “democratic” political process, etc., etc. It will take gaining a new consciousness for racial survival, led by the few, certainly not by the millions of Hagee’s or other nutcase evangelicals’ followers.

Is what’s in this piece on media control in America facts, or not?:nationalvanguard.org/books/2010-Who-Rules-America-01.pdf Fact check it.

Whites are distracted from what’s important: preservation of their own race. That is a fact! For starters, we free ourselves from alien ideology, philosophy, world view, or religion, that have been detrimental to our people. Then withdraw as best we can our consent to be governed by JOG, and associate only among the best of our own. Then we organize our own mass media to circumvent that of our Jewish masters. Giving up bastardball, football, “Dancing With the Stars,” etc., will not be difficult once we get our perspective and priorities right.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Thu Aug 28, 2025 7:53 pm

Talking electorial politics (mass democracy): https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/co ... st-no-651/




Will Williams: August 29, 2025
John MacDonald: August 28, 2025… break this false dialiectic of a Vance vs Newsom… Propping up Newsom [is] a joke… Vance should not even be part of the conversation. Trump is such an utter failure, we either need a serious nationalist or to not vote at all.
---

There will not be any serious, open White nationalist running for president in the present joke of an electorial system: mass democracy. David Duke tried in 1987. How did that work out? He was entirely smeared and shut out by Jewish media. It was already way too late, way back then.

Democracy is a joke and it should be clowned on and made a mockery of at every opportunity.
---

Exactly! What racially conscious White in his right mind actually believes our people will vote our way out of the mess in which we find our people? Local elections in White areas are still worthwhile, but that’s it.

I was talking to our brilliant, courageous pro-White attorney Sam Dickson yesterday. He and I are the same age and go way back. I first met him in Atlanta in 1986 when he was working with David Duke on a usual Jewish issue: the denial of a planned venue for a gathering due to Jewish pressure on the facility. We swapped war stories in our chat and had some good laughs — one, exchanging stories about how stupid the White electorate is to still support mass democracy as a possible solution: “Two wolves and a sheep voting for what’s for dinner.”
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Fri Aug 29, 2025 8:38 pm

Agreeing with Greg Johnson and taking it further: https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/na ... this-week/ Way too many college students who are unqualified. Any Negro that can bareky read can become a college graduate



Will Williams: August 30, 2025
Howard Lutnik explained that without these [600,000 Chinese] students, the bottom 15% of colleges in America would close down… Frankly, if 15% of colleges went out of business, that would not be a bad thing. If employers were empowered to hire based simply on IQ tests, a lot more colleges would go broke. Good riddance…
---

Thank you, Greg. If 50% of colleges in America closed it would not be a bad thing. If 100% of Chinese were denied student visas to study in our homeland and displace hundreds of thousands of qualified White students, it would be a good thing.

Who gives a shit what Trump’s Commerce thinks anyway?
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5799
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting on Counter-Currents site

Post by Will Williams » Sat Aug 30, 2025 9:13 am

Speaking of pro-invaders in the UK, a friend sent me this: https://counter-currents.com/2025/08/ho ... rotestors/ Is the judge a Jew? Does it matter to the Brits?



Will Williams: August 30, 2025
John: August 21, 2025 If Christianity, if the Bible explicitly opposed miscegenation, which aligns with the Laws Of Nature, we would not have multiracial societies…it is factual that the Laws Of Nature oppose race mixing for the simple reason that it would lead to the extermination of biodiversity.
---

That is a ridiculously big IF, John. Christianity is anti-Nature.

I do not go on the social medium X, but a friend who does, sent me this:

This UK judge is a Jew. He ruled against the local govt that a hotel must continue to house invaders and at great risk and expense to the British people. Hopefully, things will realley kick off. https://x.com/vpopulimedia/status/1961425734200623607
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Post Reply