Hamburger Today: April 5, 2025 I perfectly accept that there is a White Vanguard. It’s made of of Whites who have made a commitment to White survival and White thriving. White people who are ‘concerned’ about their situation can enter the White Vanguard of their own volition at at their own speed.
—
We are making progress, Wimpy. Except it takes more than Whites merely being “concerned” for them to somehow be in the exclusive White vanguard.
—
You call my position ‘big tent’ and, I suppose, it’s true. Except in one respect: I think that only Whites who care about Whites because they are White and no other reason are in that ‘tent’.
—
There you go again. But at least you define your ” big tent” WN movement accurately.
—
No sensible White person is going to give power to a leadership cadre whose intrinsic philosophy gives license to spontaneously removing the protections of the State because someone, somewhere in the Party has decided that their kind of Whiteness is ‘undesirable’.
—
Protections of the State — you’re joking. I refer you to
https://counter-currents.com/2025/02/th ... he-nation/
Who said anything about a
“Party”?
—
The fuhrer prinzip is toxic. There is only one principle that Whites need to guide them: Whites caring about Whites because they are White (and no other reason). Any deviation from this principle leads to collapse and suffering and more time wasted pursuing dead-ends.
—
You are hopeless, sir. Others may appreciate this from Martin Kerr, a White man who knows what he is talking about: Notes on the Leadership Principle | National Vanguard
The Leadership Principle is an authoritarian leadership doctrine, in which power or authority rests in the hands of those in command. Leaders are appointed rather than elected. Instead of governing by committee, consensus or majority vote, an appointed leader makes all decisions for the field of operations under his command by himself. Likewise, along with absolute authority, a leader also bears absolute responsibility for the decisions he makes; there is no passing the buck if something goes wrong…
I can attest that the LP, rather than democracy, works in effectively organizing the military and can be applied to organizing our race by a process of appointing the most deserving, proven leaders, at least temporarily.
…As it is commonly (if falsely) portrayed, the Leadership Principle is synonymous with absolute dictatorship. That is, we are told that it means that all power in a given organization is concentrated into the hands of a single person at the top of hierarchical pyramid. He has all of the pow
er (or 99 percent of it) and no one else has any. The leader is answerable to no one, and he can wield his power in any way that he chooses, for good or for ill. Anyone who dares to contradict this supreme leader or who goes against his stated desires faces punishment, which, in the popular imagination frequently means execution.
This description is a gross misrepresentation of the Leadership Principle, which is, in fact, a nuanced and efficient manner of leading men. Far from being capricious and unjust, it is a balanced and judicious method of command, that allows each person in the organizational chain to operate at his maximum potential… In his recent biography of Adolf Hitler, Ullrich Volker notes concerning the Führer’s leadership style:
He demanded of all his underlings that they spare him from unwelcome, banal, everyday details. “The best man is for me the one who burdens me the least by taking responsibility for himself ninety-five out of every one hundred decisions,” Hitler declared in October 1941. “Of course, there are cases that I ultimately have to decide.” In other words, Hitler claimed the solitary right to decide only on fundamental issues, not on routine matters he considered ancillary; it was then that he made use of his function as coordinator. Seen from this perspective, it is clear that a National Socialist leader is a team captain rather than an Oriental despot…
I won’t cut & paste a large wall of text from what William Pierce told us more than 50 years ago, except for these few words from this: Principles of Organization | National Vanguard
THE PROPER STRUCTURE of any organization depends on the goals of that organization and the conditions under which it is obliged to strive toward those goals. The long-range goals of the National Alliance are of unprecedented magnitude, and the conditions under which we must work, while not unprecedented in difficulty, are certainly formidable enough.
We want to build a whole new world, and we want to build it on a radically different ideological basis from that of the present world. In order to do so we must contend with the most determined and even fanatical opposition from the carriers of the Judeo-liberal-democratic sickness and from all those with a vested interest in the present System. Unfortunately, our opponents are able to marshal overwhelming forces against us and have almost unlimited resources at their disposal. Their chief strength, of course, is their monopoly control of the mass media. Not to be forgotten, however, are their dreadful power of the purse and their ability to deploy all the police powers of the state against us.
We are at present not only a minority but an unpopular minority. If our fellow Americans had not been hypnotized by the mass media, most of them would find themselves in agreement with the ideals for which we stand. But the Enemy has managed to raise a barrier of fear and misunderstanding between us and the public, a barrier which we must break down…
