Will Williams: January 24, 2024 Your comment is awaiting moderation.
DP84: January 23, 2024
When White Nationalism becomes hegemonic, I have no doubt there will be restrictions on what type of propaganda can be spread on the public web. For example, there will be no tolerance for speech that promotes miscegenation, nonwhite immigration, or the myth that Jews are somehow innocent of promoting the destruction of our race.
If we attain power, we *will* ruthlessly censor and prosecute our enemies. I’m not interested in debating with or negotiating with those who fervently believe in the narratives of the post-1945 world order. I support restriction of speech not because WN ideas can’t withstand critique – reality is on our side after all – but rather because I want peace and quiet, which requires consensus…
Thank you for your sober comment, DP. This topic has about run its course, but I won’t unsubscribe because I’m looking for more comments like yours rather than all this blather about the merits of social media and fear of fedposting, whatever that is, on them. I’d like to see the plug pulled on all social media, even Musk’s. He’s no friend of racial nationalism. except Zionism.
You say “If we attain power…” That borders on defeatism. If we don’t get serious, and quick, to attain power, our people face eventual extinction.
On the National Alliance’s tiny forum, WhiteBiocentrism dotcom (WB), moderated by trusted National Alliance members, we’re not interested in how many warm bodies we can attract. We seek consensus of speech, not “free speech.”
Anglin and Fuentes will never be allowed on WB because their pomposity and reputations as half-baked troublemakers precede them.
Many commentators I see here on C-C would be uninvited, not because they would promote “miscegenation, nonwhite immigration, or the myth that Jews are somehow innocent of promoting the destruction of our race” because none of that nonsense is seen here. But disagreement with the National Alliance’s sound ideology and program, once understood, does not build consensus with William Pierce’s unique, alternative ideology and program. It’s that simple.
I sense disagreement with NA’s approach from some here who have no idea what it is and are not interested in looking into it. It was for no reason that the ADL called Pierce “the most dangerous man in America.” It was for his ideology and National Alliance program for building a new, Jew-free, White World.