Our Weapon: The Truth

[Will Williams]

This article by Hadding Scott is excellent. It features discussion of Dr. Pierce's approach to Alliance-building, and some good observations about that in the comments that followed. I will put up a couple of those comments in this thread for further discussion.
---

Our Weapon: The Truth
December 2, 2011 — 144 Comments
Hadding Scott

Some of our people seem to regard honesty as an impediment. More than that, they think it is clever, having ascertained the crooked practices of some of our racial adversaries, to do as they do. This is a wrong attitude.

The tactics that have been used by our enemies will not always work for us. This is, in the first place, because what our enemies have been doing is not what we are trying to do. Tactics that will work for corrupting and weakening a people are often not applicable for the opposite purpose. In the second place, we and our supporters are not like our enemies. We are a different kind of people with a different character. While Jews and Blacks and other non-White groups will put group-solidarity ahead of truth, the best of our people will only support a spokesman if he tells the truth. Finally, we can only have a significant impact with our small voice if what we say carries weight. We have to cultivate credibility; otherwise there will be no reason to trust what we say over and against the all-pervasive propaganda of the anti-White mass-media.

Counter-Propaganda

There are two different phases of the truth that we have to tell. The most fundamental truth for us will consist in debunking the system’s propaganda, to the extent that we can do this convincingly based on credible sources.

Advertisement

Modern propaganda as defined by Jacques Ellul is the systematic immersion of the public in a particular way of looking at the world. Modern propaganda can only be conducted by a state or quasi-state controlling mass-media and educational systems.

Immersion is necessary because strong and uniform belief can only be maintained (in a large, population) in the absence of contradiction. This is a great vulnerability for the system. It means that effective counter-propaganda is much less expensive than the propaganda that it disrupts. There is great power in that one small child who says that the emperor has no clothes.

The most obvious form of counter-propaganda is media criticism. Historical revisionism is another form of counter-propaganda. Actions such as public marches can also be effective, at a more basic level, insofar as they shatter the illusion of unanimity and set an example of nonconformity.

Ellul mentions that winning people over is not always the immediate goal of (counter) propaganda; often the goal is simply to soften the pre-existing convictions. As blatantly false and unpleasant in application as the doctrine of racial equality has been, if we can simply punch holes in the wall of fear about questioning it, we will have made an effective counter-propaganda, because perception and cognition will gradually accomplish the rest. The fact that somebody expresses a forbidden thought, and forces the system and the public to tolerate it, is already a victory that puts the system into a defensive posture.

The major effect of counter-propaganda will not be a swarm of recruits wishing to sign a dotted line and pay dues to a racial organization. Do not be discouraged when this fails to occur. Rather, take note of a more subtle and widespread effect, the increased willingness of the public that has been exposed to your position to regard it as worthy of discussion, or at least tolerable. The technique is to repeat the message in a civil manner until it no longer alarms anybody. This can be accomplished on a university campus, on a talk-radio station (if the approach be gentle and cautious), and elsewhere. In this way you can broaden the range of acceptable discourse so that others too will begin to say some of what they really think. Hence the desperate effort of our enemies to shut down AmRen conferences and vilify Pat Buchanan for appearing on James Edwards’ radio show. They know that small leaks can become a deluge.

Counter-propaganda is the form of truth-telling whereby we will encounter the greatest acceptance, because the majority of White people have not been in favor of what has been happening to our societies, and because counter-propaganda is not an attempt to generate belief, but to dispel a demonstrably false belief that causes discomfort.

Whom should we be trying to reach?

Getting more people to be comfortable with saying what they really think on racial matters is only the barest beginning. What most of our people really think is usually either too moderate or too unreasoned to solve our problems. In fact, you could say that what most of our people have in regard to racial matters are not really thoughts at all, but mere attitudes. What we need is a revolution in the thinking of our people, a revolution in which oft-repeated cant is smashed with well-grounded truth.

Reliance on the truth as our weapon dictates the kinds of people that we can reach. While no project can fare well long-term if it defies the truth, it remains the case that not everybody is equally committed to the truth. Not everybody is even equally equipped to recognize what truth is. We have to reach the people who are capable of being convinced through reason and presentation of facts.

We cannot win over the masses. Most people are more impressed with how often and from how many sources they hear a claim than with whether or not it makes sense—and that’s a problem because we do not own the mass media. Nor can we win the support of those calculating people who make their major decisions based on narrow self-interest rather than with an eye toward what is right, because we do not have vast quantities of money with which to tempt them.

Indeed, such people are not reliable even when they seem to have been won over, because the next gust of wind from big media will blow them in the other direction and make them forget whatever they said today. Consequently it is a terrible waste, when our cause has very limited resources, to aim specifically for mass appeal.

There is a very great advantage in not trying to win over the broad masses directly. It means that one may state the entire truth instead of tailoring one’s statements in accord with what our enemies have conditioned the general public to accept. By choosing not to dance around various taboos, one retains the ability to make sense, which is crucial for appealing to thinkers, and for bringing them to the necessary radical conclusions.

We have to speak to the deeper souls, the people driven by idealism. These are people with a conscience and a disdain for falsehood, people who have an inner voice that objects to following the crowd when the crowd is demonstrably wrong.

Counter-propaganda should be directed especially toward the people most capable of skepticism, toward thinking people and toward those whose experience tells them that they have been ill-served by the establishment and its propaganda, or people (like farmers and truckers, Robert Mathews’ favorite demographic when he was still strictly legal) who spend much of their lives away from social pressures, or whose daily lives provide experiences that contradict equality propaganda as a matter of course (like veterinarians and police).

Truth has to be paramount. The most significant figure in the American racialist cause since World War II —William Luther Pierce — was largely, perhaps primarily, motivated by indignation at the lies all around him.

Bearers of a New Worldview

Acceptance will be more difficult when we go beyond refuting attacks on White pride and identity, to the explanation of why these attacks occur and who does them, and even more when we affirm a new way of looking at the world based on the recognition of biological group-interests. Acquiring our worldview presupposes not only conscience but a fair amount of ability to reason. It is easy enough to demonstrate unfair treatment of White people by the mass media and the government and various institutions, and to debunk the anti-White messages that these institutions promulgate. But to adopt a new worldview, abandoning the traditional conservative assumptions that have allowed our situation to degenerate, requires some real independence of thought. While counter-propaganda will appeal to a significant portion of the general White audience, a smaller number will be open to the new worldview that we present.

Our cause is thus destined to have an inner and an outer circle, generally agreeing from the gut on earthly goals, because we are of the same blood, but using different metaphysical scaffoldings to make sense of this shared racial instinct. This not at all to say that the doctrine of the inner circle should be a secret: it should be candidly admitted, just as scientists state findings.

That inner circle has to be utterly convinced that what it represents is correct, with no reliance on anything dubious, and no attempts at deception, so far as the message itself is concerned. This clarity will facilitate unanimity within that core group, and also engenders idealistic persistence. A firm conviction of truth sets the soul on fire. People who believe in what they are doing and in what they are saying will be much more indefatigable than some cheap con-men lacking the conviction that what they say is right.

How a minority view can prevail

Directing efforts at persuasion toward the conscientious minority means that, instead of trying to build a mass-movement straight away, we are recruiting an elite cadre that will be able to wield influence over the multitude when it gains the requisite strength.

It has always been organized elites that have really been responsible for the choices made by multitudes, wherever those choices have in any way deviated from the immediate path of least resistance. It’s a democratic delusion that crowds exhibit any kind of decisiveness without having been accordingly trained or directed.

This is actually a source of hope for us, because it means that we only have to win a relatively small number of converts to our cause in order to be situated to prevail.

What we are building initially must be like the philosophical schools of ancient Greece, winning converts from the thinking minority, rather than a modern mass political movement that tries to win general popular support. Thus at this point at least, the role of the American Third Position is to spread the message of White advocacy as much as possible with the media available to it. This will have a huge effect on thinking people even in the absence of electoral victories.

Today’s ideological think tanks, which wield enormous influence, are like a cheap imitation of the ancient philosophical schools. Think-tanks are to philosophical schools what Ayn Rand is to Plato — but nonetheless they have been enormously influential. This is how laissé-faire economics made its comeback in the late 20th century, because somebody set up a think-tank, the Institute for Economic Affairs, to elaborate that idea, and to present it constantly until somebody started to take it seriously.

Men like Fisher and Smedley were at the very margins of respectability in the 1950s, and the media never bothered with them. They were ignored because practically all politicians and commentators from left and right believed in the Keynsian idea that the state should intervene to manage the economy. Everyone was convinced that left to itself the free-market led to disaster – as had happened in the 1930s…. To their opponents Fisher and Smedley were right-wing dinosaurs. But they both were convinced they were a part of the future….

So one day Fisher plucked up courage and went to see Hayek at the LSE in London where Hayek was a professor. Fisher asked Hayek for advice – should he go into politics to try and stop the oncoming disaster? Hayek told Fisher bluntly that this would be useless because politicians are trapped by the prevailing public opinion. Instead, Hayek said, Fisher should try and do something much more ambitious – he should try and change the very way politicians think – and the way to do that was to alter the climate of opinion that surrounded the political class. Fisher wrote down what Hayek said to him.

“He explained his view that the decisive influence in the battle of ideas and policy was wielded by intellectuals whom he characterised as the ‘second-hand dealer in ideas’.” [Adam Curtis, The Curse of Tina]

The purpose of the “scholarly institute” that Fisher and Smedley formed was not to influence the general public directly, which they had no possibility of doing, but to convince members of the opinion-forming elite that their ideology made sense. Over the course of several decades the prevailing assumptions in economic policy have been completely reversed as a result of these efforts.

Radical social change begins with the efforts of a few fanatics who have an idea that attracts like-minded others. Revolutions in general have been accomplished by conspiracies numerically equivalent to mere single-digit percentages of the population. Even the normal electoral process in the United States, which is supposed to represent the public will, is in fact heavily influenced by militant minorities with their own channels of communication for maintaining their worldviews and coordinating their actions, like the Christian Zionist faction in the Republican Party that made George W. Bush the unassailable frontrunner more than a year before the presidential election of 2000. This faction also gave Rick Perry an instant, undeserved frontrunner status in 2011 (which he fumbled). Likewise, the influence of the far left in the Democratic Party during the 20th century was far out of proportion to their numbers among registered Democrats.

It is always a militant minority that makes history. The majority simply waits to see what happens.

We have the truth on our side, and with this we should be able to win idealists and thinkers as converts and build an effective cadre. The only other factor needed is money — not huge amounts of money such as the system has at its disposal, but enough that the organization can continue to function and grow. There are certainly people with healthy racial instincts who have money. With a solid message respectably presented and a stable and responsible leadership — which unfortunately has been all too rare in the racialist cause — some of that money is likely to be forthcoming.

Since we are relying on reason, we do not need to be able to saturate the general public with our messages. We only need a bit of publicity to attract the right people to our cadre, because alert and intelligent people will take note and seek us out if our message is right and we don’t spoil it with dishonesty or some other egregious display of faulty character.

Our Careful Rhetoric

The fact that we do not control mass-media means that we cannot lie the way our enemies lie and make it stick, if we were so inclined. We cannot use questionable sources either. We have to be careful about what we say, because anything of importance that we say, if it gets much attention at all, will have to survive intense criticism.

The beginning and foundation of our rhetoric must consist of facts that are either self-evident, or at least public knowledge that anybody can access. Such facts are to be found in news-reports, and on government and academic web sites. Sources should always be named so that the argument will not depend on the personal credibility of any White racialist but on the credibility of a mainstream or otherwise authoritative source. This is the only way that any intelligent person not already having faith in what we say can be brought around to our view.

The weekly racialist sermons of Dr. William Pierce exemplify this kind of cautious rhetoric. (Some relevant examples: The Destructive Media, 13 April 1996, contrasting coverage of shootings at Fort Bragg and Fort Pendleton; The Lesson of Amy Biehl, 8 August 1998; The Fayetteville Murders, 29 August 1998; Hate Crime, 10 October 1998; A Trial in Jasper, 6 March 1999; Jewish Democracy, 4 September 1999; Hardheaded Altruism, 2 October 1999, contrasting crimes of Augusto Pinochet and Ehud Barak.) A common formula that he used was to contrast some atrocious crime against normal White people that for some reason did not become a subject of widespread reporting, with the disproportionate coverage of some offense committed against a favored minority that, upon comparison, was really not as deserving of attention. In both instances, mainstream media are the sources, because their reporting is what is under scrutiny. Thus a convincing demonstration of anti-White media-bias is constructed.

As a result, the audience also learns about the agenda of those who control the media. In this phase of the argument the facts may be a little less well known, but still publicly verifiable. Thus within a single 20-minute speech, Dr. Pierce progressed from counter-propaganda of the most basic kind to radical criticism of the central institution upon which this democracy depends, without ever asking his listeners to take a leap of faith. This is the kind of message that can be taken seriously by serious people.

The fact that we do not have mass-media in our hands means that instead of appealing to the irrational multitude, our initial appeal must be to the deep souls who are capable of preferring what is correct over what is ubiquitous. It means that instead of an irrational propaganda, we have to respect our audience and give them the undiluted truth that they desire, and educate them through channels of communication separate from the mass-media that are hostile to us. As this organization of dedicated, capable, and likeminded White people develops, the possibilities for affecting mass-opinion and events in general will increase.

Conclusion: Reasons for Optimism

*The fact that multitudes are guided by dedicated minorities means that idealistic White people can be such a minority.
*We can generate this dedicated minority at much less expense than what it will cost the system to try to prevent it from arising.
*The force of the idealism of intelligent White people is on our side if we don’t throw it away by failing to respect the truth.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/20 ... the-truth/

[Will Williams]

Folks should read all the comments that appear after Hadding Scott's article, but I'll republish here a couple that jumped out at me. First, the one from Ward Kendall, then my response to his view.
---

Ward Kendall
December 2, 2011
White nationalism has a very long way to go before it wields a well-honed sword of truth. Right now, what we wield is more like a buck knife. With it, we cut and stab, stab and cut, and end up getting just as much blood on ourselves as our enemies. We have not yet learned to do counter-propagandistic battle with a sustained, concentrated phalanx of intellectuals, but rather continue – in large part – to scatter helter-skelter as “lone wolves”, merely snapping and yelping at our opponents’ heels. One such “lone wolf” has been snared over in Germany, showing once again how failed and useless such tactics are.

Likewise, though Bill Pierce was a very intelligent man, who wrote some very persuasive and powerful articles, he was never a leader nor a dynamic part of a united melding of top minds in the white nationalist movement. For all his wisdom, he too was a “lone wolf”, a reclusive, sequestered, and bookish man, valued primarily for his weekly broadcasts than for devising any blueprint of action for the preservation and restoration of Euro-America.

Fortunately, the WN movement is in the early stages of shedding its “secret compound” mentality that once dominated such defunct groups as The National Alliance, The Aryan Nations, Elohim City, and other Great-White-Bwana-Hidden-In-The-Woods Neo-Nazi/Christian Identity cults.

Compare, if you would, the modern, nascent efforts of Dr. Tom Sunic, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, Dr. Greg Johnson, Dr. Mark Weber, Dr. Michael O’Meara, Dr. Guillaume Faye, along with such New Right thinkers as Alex Kurtagić, Richard Spencer, James Edwards, and others, with the furtive, Hillsboro recluse that was Bill Pierce, and one can easily see an entire new paradigm shift has happened, leaving old-school WN’s and their old-fashioned methods in the dust.

Throughut his life, Bill Pierce shunned other WN’s as “inferiors” and “hobbyists”. Now that he’s dead and gone, a new forest of white nationalism will grow over the scorched earth of alienation he left behind, golden in the sunlight, brighter than any truth we’ve ever had…
---

My dissent:
---

Will Williams
December 2, 2011
Truth *is* our greatest weapon in the struggle against lies and liars. Thank you for the excellent article, Hadding, and for associating Dr. Pierce with this fundamental premise.

I doubt that Tom knew Dr. Pierce, nor did Ward, though he speaks with such familiarity of “Bill,” the so-called “furtive recluse” who allegedly “shunned other WN’s as ‘inferiors’ and ‘hobbyists’,” while he accords proper title to Drs. Tom, Kevin, Greg, Mark, Mike, and Guill.

What’s with that, Ward? I find it incongruous that you pooh-pooh the value of truth-telling while having a new blurb on the cover of your recently republished, old novel by none other than Harold Covington, who ranks up there with the likes of Scott Peterson when it comes to flagrant disregard for truth.

Dr. Pierce told the truth about things as he saw it; and the way he did it resonated with those of us with the ears to hear, so to speak. Some, a few, understood him and were inspired by his words, as here when he concluded his series, Who We Are, with “a few very concise guidelines for addressing ourselves to the task ahead”:

—

“The duration of the task will be decades, at the least, and perhaps centuries. History has a very great inertia; a historical process of long duration may culminate suddenly in a single, cataclysmic event, but every major development in the history of the race has had deep roots and has grown in soil thoroughly prepared for it by preceding developments. The course of history now, so far as our race is concerned, is steeply downward, and to change its direction will be no overnight matter, nor will this be accomplished by any gimcrack scheme which promises success without first building a foundation for that success, block by carefully laid block.

“The workers at the task will be only a tiny minority of the race. Any program which envisages an “awakening of the masses” or which relies on the native wisdom of the great bulk of our people — which is to say, any populist program — is based on a false vision and a false understanding of the nature of the masses. No great, upward step in all of our long history has ever been accomplished by the bulk of any population, but always by an exceptional individual or a few exceptional individuals. The masses always take the path of least resistance: which is to say, they always follow the strongest faction. It is important to work with the masses, to inform them, to influence them, to recruit from among them; but they must not be counted on for determinative, spontaneous support until after a small minority has already, by its own efforts, built a stronger force than that of any opposing faction.

“The task is inherently fundamental, and it will be accomplished only through a fundamental approach. That is to say, those who devote themselves to it must be pure in spirit and mind; they must understand that their goal is a society based on quite different values from those underlying the present society, and they must be committed wholeheartedly and without reservation to that goal; they must be prepared to outgrow all the baggage of superstition and convention inherent in the present society. Thus, the task is not one for conservatives or right wingers, for, “moderates” or liberals, or for any of those whose thinking is mired in the errors and in the corruption which have led us to the downward course, but it is a task for those capable of an altogether new consciousness of the world.

“The task is a biological, cultural, and spiritual one as well as an educational and political one. Its goal has meaning only with reference to a particular type of person, and if this type cannot be preserved while the educational and political aspects of the task are being performed, then the goal cannot be achieved. If the task cannot be completed in a single generation, then there must exist, somewhere, a social milieu which reflects and embodies the cultural and spiritual values associated with the goal, and serves to pass these values from one generation to the next.

‘The preservation of a social milieu, just as the preservation of a gene pool, requires a degree of isolation from alien elements: the longer the duration of the task, the higher the degree. This requirement may be difficult of fulfillment, but it is essential. What should be envisaged, then, is a task with both an internal, or community-oriented aspect, and an external, or political-educational-recruiting aspect. As the task progresses and both external and internal conditions vary, the relative weight given to the two aspects will undoubtedly vary as well…”

—
Read more: http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthrea ... 648&page=4

That sort of writing can’t be expected to find appeal among those who are not “pure in spirit and mind,” who have not “outgrown the baggage of superstition…”
---

[Will Williams]

To be fair to Ward Kendall aka "Jim West," he and I and Hadding encountered one another again, here, some nine moths later: http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthrea ... 43&page=61 where he clarified the facts surrounding the gratuitous blurb that was put on the dust cover of his novel. The book's publisher Greg Johnson put it there without Kendall's knowledge, much less with his permission.

Another comment made there by me that day 12/2/11 which lead the reader to another article by Dr. Pierce:
---

Will Williams
December 2, 2011
@Bohemianh: National Alliance Membership Handbook, published by National Vanguard Books, Copyright 1993, ISBN: 0-937944-06-8

You can see where that book and many other works published by Dr. Pierce were lumped in with child pornography and prohibited from Canada: http://www.archive.myegotimes.com/news/ ... C571E39.tx

Canadians must be protected from the weapons of truth inside the blood red cover of that little 143-page guide. Read here how that book was “sanitized” by Dr. Pierce’s successors so as not to offend those who can stand only so much truth:
http://www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot ... olicy.html

Also, here, @ WB: http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.p ... p=806#p806

[Will Williams]

I was wondering which section of the forum to put the following information, perhaps under Kevin Alfred Strom in Provenance, but after looking over the board it best belongs here.

Many of our most vehement Alliance detractors, mostly from within the so-called "Movement," claim our organization is no good because Kevin is our Media Director and he has this alleged "pedophilia" taint. Well, neither Kevin nor I are inclined to be very defensive against such smears, but this topic -- Our Weapon: The Truth -- will be where we direct all inquiries into this so-called pedophilia question concerning our beloved, selfless Media Director. The National Alliance correspondance secretary, Vanessa, forwarded the following inquiry from a former Alliance member who had heard the "rumors," and Kevin graciously responded with our greatest weapon: The Truth

Dear XXXX:

Vanessa Neubauer forwarded your message to me for a response.

The allegations against me are all completely false, and the media
accounts (and statements in online forums) about my case are full of
fictions.

I have spent a significant part of my life fighting sexual
perversion, including pedophilia, and I continue to do so.

The charges in my case were politically-motivated and brought by an
agent of the regime's FBI/JTTF ("Joint Terrorism Task Force") who,
it turns out, was also sleeping with my ex-wife, who was working
with them.

False charges, such as those against me, and those against David
Duke, and others who stand up for our race, are all too common. This
is the kind of thing the criminals in power do to those who expose
their crimes and their genocidal agenda.

Kevin A. Strom with his children

See my Address to the Court here:

http://www.kevinalfredstrom.com/2009/01 ... the-court/

and my biography here:

http://www.kevinalfredstrom.com/about/

as well as this supplementary information:

http://www.kevinalfredstrom.com/2012/06 ... innocence/

http://www.kevinalfredstrom.com/2010/09 ... -stalking/

http://www.kevinalfredstrom.com/2009/12 ... sed-again/

http://www.charlottesvilletimes.com/201 ... trom-case/

http://www.americanussr.com/american-us ... -strom.htm

http://www.dailystormer.com/saturday-af ... tell-them/

http://www.dailystormer.com/attempted-f ... ild-porno/

If you have any questions that I can clear up for you, I'd be happy
to discuss them. Pass along your telephone number, which I'll keep
confidential, and I could talk with you directly.

With best regards,

Kevin Alfred Strom
Media Director, National Alliance.

[Will Williams]

Speaking of truth-telling, this is a nice story:

Sagdluk the Liar

by Kevin Alfred Strom
American Dissident Voices transcript, July 1995

A certain Greenland Eskimo was taken on one of the American North Polar expeditions in the early part of this century. Later, as a reward for faithful service, he was brought to New York City for a short visit. At all the miracles of the White man's civilization he was filled with an amazed wonder. When he returned to his native village he told stories of buildings that rose into the very face of the sky; of street cars, which he described as houses which moved along the trail, with people living in them as they moved; of titanic bridges, artificial lights as bright as a thousand moons, and many other dazzling achievements of European man.

His people looked at him coldly and walked away. And forthwith throughout the whole village he was dubbed "Sagdluk," which means "the Liar," and this name he carried in shame to his grave. Long before his death his original name was entirely forgotten.


Typical Greenlandic Inuit man (apologies for the size)

Later, when Knud Rasmussen made his trip across the Arctic from Greenland to Alaska he was accompanied by a different Greenland Eskimo named Mitek. Mitek visited Copenhagen and New York, where he saw many things for the first time and was greatly impressed. Later, upon his return to Greenland, he recalled the tragedy of Sagdluk, and decided it would not be wise to tell the truth. Instead, he would narrate stories that his people could grasp, and thus save his reputation.

So he told them how he and Doctor Rasmussen maintained a kayak on the banks of a great river, the Hudson, and how, each morning, they paddled out to a place where there were many ducks, geese, and seals.

Mitek, in the eyes of his countrymen, was a very honest man, and his neighbors treated him with respect until the day he died.

Truth-tellers often find little sympathy among those they are trying to enlighten. But I would not be taking the risk or making the effort to bring you these truth-telling broadcasts every week if I thought that my countrymen were as limited in their capacity for understanding as Sagdluk's.

Our race has been mentally bound by superstition and ignorance in the past, and many are so bound even today. And no superstition is worse than the "liberal" superstition vended by America's hidden enemies. But the unique thing about the race which built America and the entire Western world is our instinctive belief in and respect for objective truth, the truth that stands immutable before our beliefs and wishes, the objective truth that defines reality itself. Our best men have fashioned Western science as a tool for apprehending that truth and Western technology for using it. In the process we have remade the world in our image, sometimes for good, sometimes for ill.

I treasure the hope that millions of our people will, through my efforts and yours, come to see the poisonous liberal ideology for what it really is: a denial of the hard world of objective reality and the substitution of a soft dream world where everything will be all right as long as we "believe" the right things and imprison or exterminate those who “believe” incorrectly. Our great power of science and technology, the product of our rigorous respect for objective truth, has paradoxically allowed the mentally soft to survive in great numbers, and such form the vast majority of liberal true believers.

I dare to hope that the same spirit which inspired Galileo to speak the truth when lies were what was required and demanded by the powers that ruled in his day -- I dare to hope that this spirit still flows in the blood of our people today. I believe it does. For we are not more than a few generations removed from Washington and Jefferson, from the Wright Brothers and William Shockley, from Charles Lindbergh and Admiral Peary.

That spirit will not allow America's enemies to triumph. That spirit will not stand for the lies and filth that spill forth every day from the controlled media. That spirit will not tolerate a life built on lies. That spirit, if it still lives within us, and I believe it does, will one day vanquish America's enemies and bring the truth to victory. If my words today have made that spirit of truth stir within your breast, all I ask is that you write to me today so we will be together when that happy day comes to pass.

[Cosmotheist]

Hello Folks,

It seems to me that this problem of human nature,
or this inability to handle Whole Truths of Reality,
is just one that all goes back thousands of years.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_Cave
And:
http://web.stanford.edu/class/ihum40/cave.pdf



Unfortunately, Eskimos are not the only ones that
are so afflicted and as our own White race too has
this flaw that needs correction or in a Higher Man.

Dispelling all compelling delusions requires actual
Personal Integrity, or both an intellectual honesty
and moral courage all within the self, that's rare.

As in the movie "The Matrix",
one must experience Reality
for what it actually is only by
ones own self and ones will.

And, as you can lead a horse to water,
but you can just not make them drink:


And:


The actual "Matrix" is the Jewish-controlled Mass Media and its anti-White
propaganda and all of its Cultural-Marxist enforced "Political Correctness".
Sometimes even a Black Man can tell Whites the Truth, as in this movie.

Or even get the Truth by such a stand-up comic as was George Carlin:
http://youtu.be/ZvguhhQ0LcM

LOL!

But, do just remember, that the real joke is on all of us White Goyim!


Best regards,
Cosmotheist