Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by Will Williams » Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:36 pm

Ideas on how to draw new eyes to WB and National Alliance sites.

When I saw Dr. Pierce's "General Patton's Warning" had been put up here at WB I went to Amazon.com to see what all the fuss is about Bill O'Reilly's Killing Patton book, which without reading I know must be Politically Correct, coming from O'Reilly -- then put the following comment there: http://www.amazon.com/review/R1B0JLCMHN ... hisHelpful
---

Your post: Jan 13, 2015 7:16:37 PM PST
W. W. WILLIAMS says:
O'Reilly's account of Patton can't nearly as provocative as Dr. William Pierce's "General Patton's Warning" - http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=1705 Pierce quotes from General Patton's letters, his diary and from his alarming statements to the press.

His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part: "This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it."

---

Image
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

David York

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by David York » Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:52 pm

Heh I'm sure that comment must have caught some eyes. I am willing to bet my left arm that Bill O'reilly didn't include those journal entries/letter about how unhygienic they Jews were. That wouldn't be Kosher for O'reilly. From what I heard, O'reilly's explanation was that Patton was murdered by Stalin because they feared he would drum up a war against the Soviets. That he may have drummed up a war against the Soviets may have been true, but I don't think it was Stalin who did Patton in. It was probably Eisenhower.

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by Will Williams » Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:01 pm

I was looking around for sites to put a link to today's ADV show about what a race traitor Rudy Guliani is. Found this one and left a comment: http://clashdaily.com/2015/02/islamic-l ... ker-devil/ I don't do Facebook, but my wife does and her name came up when I left the comment.
---

Lana Williams
Racial nationalists, Black and White agree on one thing: the JQ: http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/02/the ... ome-redux/
---

Also posted to a couple of Stormfront threads with the link to this ADV today: https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t10862 ... st12683829 https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1089616/#post12683819

There are probably scores of non "Movement" news sites that allow comments that can link to National Alliance sites and American Dissident Voices. Let's do it!

Farrakhan shows his displeasure with Shabbos boy Rudy: and White boy comments on Louis F.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

David York

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by David York » Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:36 pm

It would be good if someone could Photoshop an image of Rudy Giulianai wearing those cross shaped Ashes on his forehead that he was sporting all day last Ash Wednesday, and standing in front of some flames like he is in hell. That's were Rudy belongs. I suppose it isn't a very Cosmotheist thing to say but I just found it funny how Rudy was so proud to bear the sign of the cross on his head last Feb. 18th. while he is helping flush our country down the toilet. It's funny what some people pretend to do in the name of the Lord.

RockofAges

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by RockofAges » Sun Mar 01, 2015 12:43 am

I been banned by some of my best friends and gaming circles because they found out I did not follow the approved lies. Being in the movement can make one's life a lonely one at times(
But I believe it is worth it!

Here for example is google+ reason they can ban someone...

#3) Hate Speech
Our products are platforms for free expression. But we don't support content that promotes or condones violence against individuals or groups based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, nationality, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity, or whose primary purpose is inciting hatred on the basis of these core characteristics. This can be a delicate balancing act, but if the primary purpose is to attack a protected group, the content crosses the line.

WHAT THE HELL IS THEIR IDEA OF A PROTECTED GROUP?!

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by Will Williams » Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:45 pm

RockofAges wrote:I been banned by some of my best friends and gaming circles because they found out I did not follow the approved lies. Being in the movement can make one's life a lonely one at times(
But I believe it is worth it!

Here for example is google+ reason they can ban someone...

#3) Hate Speech
Our products are platforms for free expression. But we don't support content that promotes or condones violence against individuals or groups based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, nationality, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity, or whose primary purpose is inciting hatred on the basis of these core characteristics. This can be a delicate balancing act, but if the primary purpose is to attack a protected group, the content crosses the line.

WHAT THE HELL IS THEIR IDEA OF A PROTECTED GROUP?!


Every group except straight White loyalists.

"Veteran status?" That's a new one.

Those best friends you lost in your gaming circles aren't worth having, Rock. You'll find better ones.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Kevin Alfred Strom
Site Admin
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 4:02 pm
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by Kevin Alfred Strom » Mon Mar 02, 2015 12:41 pm

It would be worthwhile for National Alliance members who are skilled wordsmiths to get a Disqus account and a Gravatar account. These accounts will allow automatic comment registration (and an image of yourself -- choose a well-photographed closeup) on many establishment news sites -- at least the ones who haven't turned off comments yet.

https://disqus.com/

https://en.gravatar.com/

I've put comments on the CFR's Foreign Affairs race article, and on several articles on RT. It's a good way to get our ideas out there. Much better, I think, than debating lunatics, emotional cripples, and Federal agents on "movement" message boards.

All the best,

Kevin.

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by Will Williams » Mon Mar 02, 2015 12:54 pm

Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:It would be worthwhile for National Alliance members who are skilled wordsmiths to get a Disqus account and a Gravatar account. These accounts will allow automatic comment registration (and an image of yourself -- choose a well-photographed closeup) on many establishment news sites -- at least the ones who haven't turned off comments yet.

https://disqus.com/

https://en.gravatar.com/

I've put comments on the CFR's Foreign Affairs race article, and on several articles on RT. It's a good way to get our ideas out there. Much better, I think, than debating lunatics, emotional cripples, and Federal agents on "movement" message boards.
Good idea. Will do. Thanks, Kevin.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by Will Williams » Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:02 pm

Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:It would be worthwhile for National Alliance members who are skilled wordsmiths to get a Disqus account and a Gravatar account. These accounts will allow automatic comment registration (and an image of yourself -- choose a well-photographed closeup) on many establishment news sites -- at least the ones who haven't turned off comments yet.

https://disqus.com/

https://en.gravatar.com/
I tried to post a comment to one place, but it required Facebook, or Twitter or Yahoo something to put it up. I tried another one here: http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/20 ... character/

I made this following comment about the picture/caption below, in a discussion about physiognomy. The disqus part worked, but the gravatar part didn't (unless the reader clicks on my name). I'll have to figure out a way to add a link, like this one to that page: http://williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com ... e-job.html :lol:
---
Avatar
WillWhiteWilliams • 7 minutes ago

The hooked nose and hooded eyes really do look "deceitful." Semitic?

---

Image
The book is full of images in which the features stereotypically associated with Northern and Western Europeans, or the mythical Aryan race, are associated with sincerity, honestly, a work ethic, and every other positive character trait, whereas large and especially hooked noses and small, hooded, or almond-shaped eyes were indications of negative traits.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Michael Olanich

Re: Commenting at non "Movement" Web sites

Post by Michael Olanich » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:05 am

I made an account with disqus and gravatar last friday, but only made a few comments using disqus so far. I like the format with disqus and also you no longer need a facebook account to make comments on news-websites (I'm sure they enjoy forcing people logging in to facebook so they can make comments -- scaring them into giving away their privacy).

I'm also in agreement with Kevin and Will, I think NA members should focus their energies in writing intelligent comments to some of the news-stories that are relevant to our cause. I have a feeling the people commenting are not so nutty like the people you find on movement forums.

I'm a little confused with gravatar, however. Can you post comments only on wordpress sites using gravatar?

Post Reply