This comment was challenging, especially formatting, but I felt a responsibility to reply to Ondrej's question about whether or not Pierce would have endorsed Obama, and got another chance to promote Pierce, Oliver and Simpson in NV essays; https://counter-currents.com/2025/05/in ... hite-will/
Ondrej Mann: May 23, 2025…
Maybe Will Williams will answer you in more detail.
---
Maybe. I’ll try. Responding to Peter Quint’s two issues:
1.) Pierce did not support the electoral system of mass democracy and would
not have endorsed Barack Obama. Of that I’m reasonably certain. Pierce said in this insightful piece 29 years ago about Pat Buchanan, that is worth reading today: "Why They Hate Buchanan"
at nationalvanguard.org
Now if I were the candidate instead of Pat Buchanan, the Jews would have something to scream about. Because if I were elected I’d declare a national emergency, and I’d immediately take the control of our news and entertainment media away from them. I’d root them out of Hollywood. I’d weed them out of our universities. I’d remove them from the courts. I’d clean house. But I really don’t believe that Buchanan would do that. He’s certainly never said or written anything to indicate he’d do that. He’s not a revolutionary. He’s a conservative. He’s a Republican. He’s a Christian. He’s simply a fellow with old-fashioned values, and he’s a fighter. He has no particular grudge against the Jews, but when some of them desecrate his church, he becomes angry and says something about it. When he sees an injustice taking place, as in the persecution of John Demjanjuk, he may or may not speak out, but his decision as to whether or not to speak out isn’t based on what the Jews might think about it. He has other considerations.
And basically that’s why the Jewish media are attacking him so viciously. They can’t tolerate a politician who has any considerations other than what the Jews might think. Basically they can’t tolerate a politician who doesn’t jump when they whistle. If he won’t apologize and grovel now, there’s no telling what he might not do if he’s in the White House. He might not send all of those billions of dollars from American taxpayers to Israel every year. He might not appoint Jews to half of his cabinet positions and to the head of the CIA and to every Supreme Court vacancy, the way Clinton has. He might not send U.S. troops when and where he’s told to send them. He might not base his policies on what’s good for the Jews instead of on what’s good for America. That’s why they hate him. That’s why they’re trying to convince the voters that he’s an extremist… Buchanan is not part of the system. Buchanan is an outsider. A Buchanan win would severely damage the prestige of the system. It would upset the Republican applecart [Think Trump 20 years later]…
That’s why they keep calling him an “extremist,” when in fact his views are anything but extreme. God, I wish that he were an extremist! We need more extremists.
What’s important for us to remember, though, is that extremism isn’t the issue here. Extremism is just a smoke screen. The real issue is refusing to take orders from the Jews, refusing to follow the Jewish party line. That’s what the Jews call “anti-Semitism.” That’s what they call “hate.” That’s what they call “neo-Nazism.”…The big media bosses, the top Jewish leaders, would like to keep the issue confined to “extremism.” They would like for the general public not to know about the charges of “anti-Semitism” and “neo-Nazism” that they’re throwing around so freely in their Jewish publications that we’re not supposed to see….
Actually that sort of thing already is happening to a small degree. Some of the really excitable Jews, the really hateful Jews, already are finding it impossible to keep their mouths shut. One of these is Rabbi Avi Weiss, a very intense little Jew who heads a Hebrew outfit called “Amcha.” Rabbi Weiss and his followers have made a habit of trying to disrupt Buchanan’s election rallies. They jump up on the speaker’s platform with signs saying, “Buchanan Is a Jew Hater,” and wave them in front of the TV cameras. Of course, they get tossed out of the rallies, and some of the Buchanan supporters who are there tell them what they think about their antics. To Weiss, this is proof that he is right: Buchanan and his supporters are Jew-haters, because they call Weiss and his fellow disrupters nasty names when they toss them out of rallies. Weiss is accustomed to politicians who grovel and apologize. Anyone who doesn’t grovel and apologize must be an “anti-Semite” – especially anyone who dares to say nasty things to one of God’s Chosen People. And so Rabbi Weiss, who writes in general circulation newspapers as well as in strictly Jewish papers, is loudly calling Buchanan an “anti-Semite.”
And I believe that other Jews will begin doing the same before the campaign is over. That will allow Buchanan supporters to understand who their real enemy is, to understand who’s behind the propaganda campaign against Buchanan, to understand who’s pulling Bob Dole’s strings.
Of course, the trendy liberal elements will follow the Jewish lead, as they always do, and they also will step up the intensity and viciousness of their own attacks on Buchanan. But still, the general public will have a chance to see that the reason the media and the party bosses don’t like Buchanan isn’t extremism at all. It’s what his enemies will call “anti-Semitism” and what is really just a reluctance to let the Jews tell him what to think and what to say and lead him by the nose the way they lead the other politicians. And at least some members of the public will gain a bit of understanding of the nature of the Republican/Democrat political charade in Jew-ridden America. They’ll understand that if the Jews don’t like you, then the media won’t like you. And if the media don’t like you, you won’t get elected.
That alone will make these ongoing Republican primaries an enormously rewarding experience for America. It’ll be a rewarding experience for me too. Sometimes I feel a bit awkward, talking week after week about the Jewish control of the news and entertainment media, the Jewish control of the American political process, the Jewish control of the U.S. government.
People should be able to see these things for themselves. I shouldn’t have to tell them the same things over and over again. The evidence is everywhere. It’s obvious. But most people don’t pay attention to it. They don’t want to come to conclusions that might be considered “extremist.” So they pretend that everything is all right, even when they know that it isn’t. And they hope that someone like Pat Buchanan will come along and fix things.
And now they see Buchanan being attacked, first as an “extremist” and then as an “anti-Semite,” for saying that we ought to restore the integrity of our borders, that we ought to enforce our immigration laws, that we ought to protect American workers from competition with Chinese and Mexican workers, that we ought not to start wars unless America’s vital interests are threatened.
For that he’s an “anti-Semite”?….
That was 1996. Pierce had much more to say about Buchanan and the Jews three years later, prior to PB’s 2000 presidential bid, in this memorable piece: A Call for “Tolerance” at nationalvanguard.org:
…New York’s Jewish Press, which bills itself as the world’s largest-circulation English-language newspaper for Jews. Three weeks ago, in the October 1 issue of the Jewish Press, a Jewish spokesman, Professor Howard L. Adelson, had a column titled “Another Sewer Rat Appears.” Professor Adelson wrote, and I quote: “Out of the slime of the sewers and into the filth of the gutter a desperate Patrick J. Buchanan, the neo-Nazi, has crawled into the political arena using anti-Semitism as his principal device to secure a future for himself.” That’s the first sentence in Professor Adelson’s column, and it’s a bit awkward, so I’ll read it again for you, and you can savor it’s Jewish flavor: “Out of the slime of the sewers and into the filth of the gutter a desperate Patrick J. Buchanan, the neo-Nazi, has crawled into the political arena using anti-Semitism as his principal device to secure a future for himself.”
Well that’s just the beginning of a very long column by Professor Adelson, and every sentence oozes a vicious, Talmudic hatred. He goes on to say that Buchanan “always was a neo-Nazi,” whose “ignorance is astounding” and “reveals the shallow quality of his tortured, sick, defective mind.” ….
Similar statements follow by other Buchanan-hating Jewboys, including media darling and Jeffrey Epstein buddy, Alan Dershowitz. It’s also a must read in its entirety at the link above, if only to see what he said about front man for the Jews, Donald Trump, in 1999. Pierce said:
I want to make it clear that I am not a Buchanan supporter. Buchanan is the only candidate who comes even remotely close to being honest, to being a man of principle, a man who means what he says and says what he means. I have agreed with some of Buchanan’s positions in the past, but we also disagree on a number of fundamental issues, and I will not be supporting him, partly because I cannot support the system under which all the candidates will be running.
He would
not have supported Obama for “accelerationism” or for any other reason.
—
2.) Readers can read about RPO on C-C here, including his review of WGS’s Which Way Western Man?: Remembering Revilo Oliver (July 7, 1908–August 20, 1994) Oliver is a featured writer on NV with 443 entries, here: “Revilo P. Oliver” at nationalvanguard.org. Searches there for Simpson, a National Alliance member and and early follower of Cosmotheism, will turn up several essays, including this one that describes his life in a nutshell: “William Gayley Simpson: A Volkish Life” at nationalvanguard.org:
…Simpson, published in the short book Toward the Rising Sun over eighty years ago. Simpson was a man who took Christianity and the teachings of Jesus more seriously than most anyone in his day. He took Jesus at his word. Unlike most Christians, he attempted to actually live the ideals he professed to believe in. Simpson spent years in poverty wandering the country doing odds jobs (only to give away all his money) and putting himself at service to the lowest of the low.
Simpson lived this ‘Franciscan’ life for many years until he came upon the works of Friedrich Nietzsche. After reading the entirety of the philosophers’s work, he was ultimately forced to abandoned his deep faith in Christ and his humanitarian world view. Such was the price of his integrity as a thinking man and the natural outcome of his relentless truth seeking. Of course, he didn’t stop there; Simpson then came to appreciate the singular importance of race and the deadly peril facing our White Western world.
His transformation was remarkable. But what was truly impressive was that he spoke openly about everything that he had learned — even when it meant losing everything he had worked his whole life to accomplish. One by one, his close friends abandoned him. Foundations and colleges that used to pay him to speak now blacklisted him. But Simpson was not deterred, he continued to speak and write to whomever would listen for the rest of his life. He compiled his writings, which span from the 1930s to the 1970s, into a masterpiece he titled Which Way Western Man? It is without a doubt the greatest book written by an American in the 20th century.
Simpson’s fearless truth seeking was as broad as it was deep. His work is intensely personal and poetic — he speaks right to the soul of the racially conscious White man. But his thought is also worldly and clear — something which no doubt comes from his extensive knowledge of history. This union is what makes Simpson’s work the perfect starting point for Volkish Spirituality in America today. We need a clear mind but also a burning heart.
But what did Simpson propose our people believe in if not Christianity?
Echoing Nietzsche, Simpson called for a new Religion of Life. He claimed God was to be found inside ourselves — what he called the ‘divine spark’ or ‘inner light’. He knew that we didn’t need a book to find God. We didn’t need a priest to interpret God’s will. And that it was wrong for us to look back to ancient Palestine, two thousand years ago, in order to learn how best to live in our present day.
Finally, Simpson knew that our soul was intimately tied to our race — our Aryan blood — and therefore this new religion must be a religion of and for that blood. And like Nietzsche, he proclaimed that our new mission was first to ennoble ourselves and then to inspire the same in our people. He felt that we mustn’t be content with what we presently are, but must strive to remake ourselves constantly into something higher and greater.
As Volkish Believers, we must take part in the spiritual journey that consumed Simpson’s life. Because if we do, we will move that much closer to becoming the new Higher Man, who alone can save our Volk….
):