Commenting on Counter-Currents site

[Will Williams]

Daffy Christian Identity Pastor Martin Lindstadt had been absent from commenting on C-C for a good while, then reappeared and was welcomed back today by Dr. Greg Johnson which gave me the chance to feature how the pastor had exposed Harold Covington as a fraud back in 2003. Greg had in the past featured Covington on C-C several times as a great novelist without regard for all the damage the SOB had done to the cause for decades with his political sabotage and malicious smears of legitimate leaders: https://counter-currents.com/2025/06/li ... -seducers/
My point to Dr. Johnson and C-C fans, as always with Covington: character counts.


Will Williams: July 12, 2025

Greg Johnson: July 12, 2025 Nice to see you back!
---

Yes, ’tis.

Greg, Linda Ronstadt aside for the moment, you might enjoy this blast from the past (2003) by Pastor Lindstedt when he’d finally had enough of being “used” by Harold “Big Lie” Covington:

Covington was making a big show of Christian faith in order to cultivate White Christian followers, even though he did not believe in their religion whatsoever. The fact that Covington really had contempt for White Christians became obvious years later when he (subtly) expressed that contempt in one of his novels. Pastor Martin Lindstedt complained about this in 2003 as follows:

I ended up asking about Covington back in 1998, when I was suspicious about being ‘used’ by appearing on Covington’s ‘Whitespeak’ jewhoogruppen [Yahoo group]. Katya Lane* ended up predicting, “Sooner or later you will grow tired of his lies.” Well, I must have been stupid because I didn’t figure out until reading Covington’s latest self-published novel, “Swill of the Jayhawks” [Hill of the Ravens] that Covington regarded Christian Identity soldiers as nothing but cannonfodder to be given third-rate shitizenship, if that, in Covington’s ‘NorthWest Republic’ of covingtonistas. [Martin Lindstedt, VNN Forum, 22 December 2003]

Lindstedt here was seeing through Covington’s duplicity, as [Gary] Gallo** called it. It means that Covington is not delusional (or at least not thoroughly delusional): he is a man who talks out both sides of his mouth and knows it.

—

*Katya Lane was David Lane’s wife at the time.
**Gary Gallo (West Point and Georgetown Law graduate) headed the National Democratic Front at the time. Gary went on to graduate from medical school.

[Will Williams]

I'm familiar with Tucker Carlson's thin gruel and I've seen TPUSA's Charlie Kirk's even weaker, watery porridge featured as a FOX News commentator. Serious racial nationalists shoud not expect anything but more thin gruel from these two controlled media personalities: https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/editors-update-59/


Will Williams: July 12, 2025

Dr ExCathedra: July 12, 2025 I’ve listened to part of Tucker Carlson’s speech at Turning Point USA. He is pressing the issue of Israel’s influence here…
---

Wow! the Tuckster really went way out on a limb to say that.

—
But, alas, he remains adamantly propositional, condemning “identity politics.” One step forward, one step, or more, back.
---

It’s more like Tuck has taken another ten steps back from serious racial nationalism, Dr. X.

Turning Point USA? Seriously? That mixed-race Christian Zionist crowd of “conservative” MAGA Trumpsters will not be “pressing the issue of Israel’s influence” anytime soon.

[Will Williams]

It's not that often that Scott will say he agrees with me. Here he agrees with me about what I wrote about the Jew Baden, but not completely with what I'd written about the scummy Jew Dershowitz, but he doesn't say what it was that he didn't agree with me about him: https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/editors-update-59/ I get to educate C-C readers about the O.J. Simpson trial, using the words of Dr. Pierce from 30 years ago.



Will Williams: uly 13, 2025

Scott: July 12, 2025 I agree with what Will says about Dr. Michael Baden and most of what you say about Dershowitz,
---

What part did I write about about the greasy kike Dershowitz that you did not agree with, Scott?

…who still (with a straight face) claims that the LAPD planted evidence against O.J. Simpson… (((Marcia Clark))) and her Negro sidekick botched the prosecution spectacularly.
—

It’s off the topic, but I’ll address that.

It’s been 30 years since the O.J. judicial travesty — before some here who read C-C were born, but William Pierce summed it up nicely in: “The End of Justice in America: Lessons of the Simpson Trial” at nationalvanguard.org

... Just look at the Simpson trial itself, completely aside from the unjust verdict: the trial, up to the time the case went to the jury, certainly wasn’t anything that a White American could be proud of. It was hardly even a trial; it was a multicultural circus, a long-running soap opera made for television.

It was a paradigm of multiculturalism and trendiness: We had a Japanese judge married to a White woman who is a police captain. We had a prosecution team consisting of a Black male and a Jewess [(((Marcia Clark)))] currently being divorced by a White man. We had a defense team which, with the exception of F. Lee Bailey, was entirely Jewish and Black. We had a Black defendant who likes to run with White women — and beat them up. We had one Jewish murder victim and one White female victim who had been raised by her liberal parents to couple with Blacks. We had a racially mixed but mostly Black jury. And the whole thing seems to have been run more for the benefit of the television networks than for the sake of justice…

Did Dr. Pierce get that right? Of course he did.

But Dershy still claims Detective Mark Fuhrman, who had supposedly been “impeached” for previously uttering the word “nigger,” planted the bloody glove? Really? Dr. Pierce continued:

…[T]he subversion and wrecking of our American justice system have been going on quietly for decades. And we didn’t oppose it. Some of us wanted to be trendy and fashionable, and so we went along with the multiculturalism. Some of us were cowards. We knew what was happening was wrong, but we were afraid to say so: we were afraid of being called racists and anti-Semites. And many of us were just indifferent to what was happening: we were too selfish to get involved. And so we let America’s enemies destroy our justice system. We let them destroy the only shield we had against governmental tyranny on the one hand and mob rule on the other hand: our only shield — and now it’s gone.

We didn’t stand up for our honest, decent White policemen, for our racially conscious White policemen like Detective Mark Fuhrman, who, God bless him, fought the multicultural terror and anarchy in the streets in the only way he knew, without any support from the politicians and the bureaucrats. He may have been a little rough in his methods sometimes, but he knew the nature of the beast he was fighting. He knew that if we don’t destroy it, it surely will destroy us.

We let the politicians and the bureaucrats follow the lead of the controlled media and weed out the racially conscious White policemen and replace them with Politically Correct trendies, who collaborate with the multicultural terrorists instead of fighting them. The same thing has happened in the courts that has happened in the police departments around the country. The honest, no-nonsense judges have been replaced by media-conscious trendies like Lance Ito.

During her closing argument the Jewish prosecutor in the Simpson trial, Marcia Clark, said that we all wish that there were no one like Mark Fuhrman on this planet. Do you remember that? When I heard her say that, it really infuriated me. I suspect that many of you who also heard her say that thought at the time, as I did, that, no, we are happy to share this planet with Detective Mark Fuhrman. Instead, we will welcome the day when there are no longer any Marcia Clarks, or people of her type, on this planet…

Again, Dr. Pierce was 100% right.

Had courageous White Americans not just listened to him back then, but joined with him, we wouldn’t be in quite the mess we find ourselves today. Something else Pierce was right about 30 years ago. found also at nationalvanguard.org, “Brainwashing in America”

“We can make a difference, because courage is contagious. It spreads from person to person. And it’s powerful. One courageous truthteller can back down a thousand cowards and liars and hypocrites. He can send a whole regiment of Jewish media bosses scurrying for cover, like vampires fleeing the light of the rising sun. There has never been a time in the long history of our race when we were more in need of a few honest men and women, a few people of courage and integrity. There has never been another time when a few good men and women had the opportunity to make such a big difference as they can make now.”

[Will Williams]

Another off-topic comment, but adding to Douglas Mercer's comment about anti-German propagandist Spielberg's plans to make another Holocaust guilt-film based on a book of fiction: https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/editors-update-59/



Will Williams: July 13, 2025

Douglas Mercer: July 13, 2025 … Steven Spielberg has optioned the rights to film the novel The Light Of Days... So after Schindler’s List he’s going to go to the well one more time.
---

How many movie fans believe that Swindler’s List is a true Holocaust story, but is actually based on another novel, a work of fiction? I’d say about as many who know that Ukraine’s Jewish queer President Zelensky’s previous occupation was as a comedian, famous for playing the piano with his penis.

I put up this 30-year-old article by Michael Hoffman, exposing the fraud that won seven Academy Awards, including Best Picture for Spielberg. See “Shindler’s Ark” at whitebiocentrism.com from nine years ago.

Will Williams wrote: Tue May 24, 2016
Swindler’s Mist: Spielberg’s Fraud in Schindler’s List
A Review & A Discussion of the Talmud on Gentiles
By Michael A. Hoffman, Alan R. Critchley
Published: 1994-01-01

Hollywood illusionist Steven Spielberg’s mendacious anti-German libel, Schindler’s List, is based upon a novel, that is to say, a work of fiction, titled in its first edition, Schindler’s Ark, by the Australian writer Thomas Keneally (the book’s name was later altered to coincide with the title of the movie).

Keneally’s work is riddled with errors…

There are certain aspects of Keneally’s book which Spielberg omitted from the movie. Keneally mentioned that Schindler worked for the powerful Hungarian Jew Rudolf Kastner. Nowhere will this information be found in Schindler’s List because in 1944 Kastner helped Eichmann deport hundreds of thousands of Jews to Auschwitz, in return for favorable treatment for Kastner’s Zionist cronies. The fact of high level cooperation between Nazis and Zionists was too embarrassing to be included in Spielberg’s pro-Zionist film…

Much has been made of the supposed "conciliatory nature" of Schindler's List because it shows exactly two Germans (Mr. and Mrs. Schindler) acting decently. However it depicts every member of the German military as either a monster or a homicidal robot. The perpetuation of this false stereotype constitutes hate propaganda...