Commenting on Counter-Currents site

[Will Williams]

Though C-C chose to not republish Wolf Stoner's latest excellent essay on its front page, I mention it here in a comment.https://counter-currents.com/2025/06/th ... eadership/ Am I the only person at C-C who takes a dim view of the Negro Lipman Matthews writing on C-C's front page? He must be popular with someone?



Will Williams: July 5, 2025

Negro Lipman Matthews tells us: Politics should be about ideas, not identity. 
---

Ideas are important, yes, but should this Negro be telling White racial nationalists what politics to believe? Seriously.

The Lpman

I'll risk being known as a maverick dissident for saying we do not need to be provided counsel from Negroes about identity politics. I prefer wisdom from our own about the primacy of race, thanks.

WikiJews define identity politics for us as: politics based on a particular identity, such as ethnicity, race, nationality, religion, denomination, gender, sexual orientation, social background, political affiliation, caste, age, education, disability, opinion, intelligence, and social class.

Nothing about ideas in WikiJews' 16 categories of identty politics, Lipman. Race is but 1/16th.

I prefer the brilliant White racial nationalist Wolf Stoner's latest essay, published last month at nationalvanguard.org "Identity, Loyalty, Determination"

An individual cannot exist by himself... He has an identity. Identity is the first and the most important factor in life... Identity matters. More than this; it determines everything else. Identity encompasses all other aspects of individual and social life. It is the primary law that must define all social sciences, if they are to be sciences instead of nonsense concocted to justify the power of a particular tribe or...  [or of their "ideas"].

In describing any event, any community, any individual, we must begin by correctly defining its identity. The term “identity” encompasses many aspects. Biological identity is the first. It is the set of inborn immutable qualities that create a framework for everything else. In the case of humans, the term biological identity is interchangeable with the term racial identity.

[Will Williams]

The reader may detect my frustration in this response to Kathryn S when I tried to link to WRA? at nationalvanguard.org only to find it is not on NV. We'll get it put there eventually, as well as find a volunteer or a team to update and revise WRA?, arguably the most important document the National Alliance has ever produced: https://counter-currents.com/2025/06/my ... ry-ballet/

I bumped a two-year-old WB topic today that deals with this WRA? subject: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=6092&start=10 (“Who Rules America” report on media ownership and control). I cannot expect to get a volunteer from C-C to do this project, You never know from where help will appear -- but I do expect to motivate an Alliance member or supporter to step up, though very few of them have registered or participate here at WB.

Oh, well, we'll persevere!




Kathryn S: July 4, 2025 Thank you for the encouragement, Mr. Williams!

Most people are either constitutionally wired to accept whatever the social norm of the day is, or they simply don’t want trouble; I don’t mean that in an ugly or condescending way — it just seems to be a fact.
—

You are quite welcome.

It is a fact. Most people want to leave well enough alone; don’t want to rock the boat; instead, toe the line: don’t cause trouble — conform!

You may have noticed that I promote the wise, timeless teachings of William Pierce. Besides the term “lemming-like” that he practically coined to describe this behavior he spoke more about that here: “Fear of the Smear” at nationalvanguard.org.

…[J]ust two of the racially destructive programs [organized Jews] already have in place are, one, keeping our borders open to immigrants from the non-White areas of the world and, two, doing everything they can to encourage miscegenation. Their immigration program, aimed at flooding White areas with non-Whites, is backed primarily through the government. Their miscegenation program, aimed at increasing the degree of racial mongrelization, is backed primarily by their mass media — although they also use their influence among the Christian clergy and in the educational establishment to enlist the aid of the churches and the schools in pushing the acceptance of miscegenation among their White victims.

A majority of the people they intend to destroy are kept hypnotized by the mass media and offer no resistance. An independent-minded minority, however, are not entirely happy about our enemies’ plans and insist on speaking out and sometimes taking other measures against the programs intended to destroy them. These dissidents who speak against our enemies and their plans are described by the media as “haters,” as “extremists.” Or, if talk turns to action, the dissidents are denounced as “terrorists.” In most cases fear of these labels, fear of being called a “hater,” is sufficient to keep the dissidents quiet. After all, most independent-minded people, just like the lemmings, are social creatures. They desire the goodwill of their neighbors. They don’t want to be hated or reviled or even feared. They have families and jobs. They don’t want their colleagues or coworkers to consider them odd or dangerous. They don’t want their friends and acquaintances among the lemmings to shun them.

There’s that word again — lemmings. He continues:

The media bosses, who are foremost among the enemies of our people, thus have a very powerful weapon in their ability to label arbitrarily as “haters” any dissidents bold enough to speak out against them or their policies or even against the consequences of their policies…

Until Whites get serious and effectively organize to resist our replacement, building our own multi-media to reach our people — available all day, every day — to circumvent the stranglehold that powerful organized Jewry has on America’s mass mind through control of the news and entertainment industry, we may as well give up and go fishing.

Many Whites think that’s exaggerating, that Jewry does not have that power, but it is a fact, as documented in this Alliance booklet that Pierce updated yearly: http://nationalvanguard.org/books/2010- ... ica-01.pdf. I do not know if that link I just transcribed will work because I am a computer idiot. I’ll eventually see that WRA? will appear at at nationalvanguard.org as “Who Rules America?” but for some reason it is not there currently (I suspect because that site’s admin considers it outdated). Outdated, or not, it is too important a document to languish at some difficult-to-find Web page.

* * * * *

So, please pardon this appeal by me, Kathryn:

If any capable person reading this is interested in revising and updating Who Rules America?, contact me. I’ll see that whoever does this project is paid for his work. “John Q. Publius,” whoever he is, practically updated WRA? 5 and 1/2 years ago at theoccidentalobserver.net with his essay, “Ways of Seeing: Who Determines Your Reality?” posted there 20 January 2019.

JQP did a “Jim Goad” and disappeared from TOO soon after writing this, but his entire essay was republished here by me two years ago, along with a similar call for volunteers to update WRA?: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=6092&start=10 (“Who Rules America” report on media ownership and control)

No takers then, but perhaps we’ll find one or two now.

[Will Williams]

I don't trust academics who write books about White racial nationalists and give an example here of why. https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/th ... e-books-1/



Will Williams: July 7, 2025

David M. Zsutty: July 2, 2025  I don’t think these lefty authors realize it or perhaps assumed we would never read their books but they are providing us with strategic level intel about what they think about us.
---

"What (((they))) think about us" in academia hasn't changed much lately, with the exception of Professor Hawley perhaps. I must have six or eight university textbooks by Jews and other "hate" experts, that attack us mercilessly while they pack impressionable young minds with their anti-White brain rot in sociology, psychology and polital science classes.

As I'm working to republish the Alliance's 22-page, well-known in our circles, booklet, "Who Rules America" that exposes Jewish control of media, I find this description of WRA? from WikiJews:

Who Rules America? is a book by research psychologist and sociologist G. William Domhoff, Ph.D.**, published in 1967 as a best-seller (#12).

**I could not find that Dr. Domhoff is Jewish, but he was claims to have been active in the Civil Rights movement, which makes him suspect, and his research partner Adam Schneider is a very Jewish yeshiva boy. WikiJews go on:

WRA is frequently assigned as a sociology textbook, documenting the dangerous concentration of power and wealth in the American upper class.[1] More recent editions have brought the discussion up to date, including the rise of Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and the trend toward nationalism in the Republican Party.[2] Domhoff argues in the book(s) that a power elite wields power in America transparently through its support of think tanks, foundations, commissions, and academic departments.[3]... In his introduction, Domhoff writes that the book was inspired by the work of four previous researchers: sociologists E. Digby Baltzell, C. Wright Mills, economist Paul Sweezy, and political scientist Robert A. Dahl.[5]

I searched for a friendlier description of WRA? on Metapedia, but that site was blocked. It took until page 3 in a search to find it, oddly enough, in full, on the thief Alex Linder's anti-National Alliance site, here: Vanguard News Network » Who Rules America?

Also on the VNN site is this from 2021 by "Socrates": Vanguard News Network » Blog Archive » How I Met Dr. William Pierce

How I Met Dr. William Pierce
...(Sadly, I never met Dr. William Pierce in person. When I say I “met” him, I mean that I “met” his essays, his videotaped public speeches, and his radio shows. Pierce was the biggest influence on me becoming a White Nationalist, especially his landmark essay “Who Rules America?”...

I read the article “Who Rules America?” [in 1993]. It was about Hollywood and the American news media. And, while I found it interesting, I also found it far-fetched. The article claimed that Jews controlled Hollywood and the American media. I had never heard this claim before, and so I was skeptical of the claim...

Weeks passed and I read the “Who Rules America?” article again. I decided to investigate some of the claims made in it for myself. I decided to ask around about it, and to also go to the local library as well. Mind you, this was before the internet, which wasn’t in place until circa 1996 and then it was mostly email stuff, very few websites.

My investigations into the “Jewish matter” turned up the fact that Jews were disproportionately involved with Hollywood. In fact, they founded Hollywood. So, that lent some credence to the claims. But I still needed more proof than just that essay... I still needed more convincing. So I did more research. It took months.

The bottom line is this: I tried and tried to catch Dr. Pierce telling a lie or pushing untrue propaganda. But I couldn’t... if Dr. Pierce says “X” is true, then it’s true. Period. His factual track record is 50 times better than that of any mainstream media outlet. If you want the truth, then read/listen to Dr. Pierce.. He seems very thorough in his research. (I am told that Pierce had a world-class library — i.e., the National Alliance book store and his own personal book collection as well — and in fact I’ve seen parts of that library in a video).

“Dr. Pierce was like a “book magnet,” attracting donations of many valuable volumes, many of them rare, out of print editions, which were entrusted to him because of his integrity — and the likelihood they would be put to good use.” — from the National Alliance Bulletin, March 2017.

Actually, I wrote what "Socrates'" quotes in his last paragraph there from my 3/17  NA Members BULLETIN. He fails to mention that I purchased Dr. Pierce's "world class library " and "personal book collection" in 2014 from Pierce's successor to secure them for the National Alliance. The video he says he had watched of Pierce's library is of me, documenting the moving of it from WV to TN before I became NA Chairman.

[Will Williams]

An anecdote by an apparent French switch-hitter jogged my memory about a piece a few years ago conparing Camp of the Saints and The Turner Diaries as to which was the worst "hate literature": https://counter-currents.com/2025/07/je ... ssed-away/


Will Williams: July 8, 2025

Peter Quint: July 7, 2025 In May 2019, I flew to the city on the Seine to visit my ex-husband and colleagues from the Sorbonne. He was very pleased and invited me and my wife to his apartment. Is this a man, woman, or an it?
---

That is an unusual thing for Zuzanna Adamson, likely a female, to include in her anecdote about meeting Mr. Raspiel. Ondrej, are you sure you translated that correctly?

An interesting comparison by Heidi Beirich wannabe, Kathleen Belew**, between Raspiel’s The Camp of the Saints and Pierce’s The Turner Diaries by Miss Lulu Garcia-Nararro for NPR (National Polshevik Radio):

**Ms. Belew is another one of those “respectable” academic authors — currently Associate Professor of history at Northwestern U) — who is a “go-to” expert in White haters and hate groups by watchdogs like the SPLC. Read her credentials and about her “history” books, here: Kathleen Belew: Department of History – Northwestern University

Stephen Miller And ‘The Camp Of The Saints,’
A White Nationalist Reference
November 19, 2019
By Lulu Garcia-Navarro

Leaked Emails Reference to ‘Camp Of The Saints,’ A White Nationalist Guide : NPR

…Senior White House adviser (((Stephen Miller))) is an immigration hard-liner. He engineered the Trump administration’s family-separation policy and its travel ban on people from some Muslim-majority countries…

But last week, the Southern Poverty Law Center detailed leaked emails in which it says Miller encouraged far-right website Breitbart to promote white supremacist ideas. In one message, Miller references a book of fiction: “Someone should point out the parallels to Camp of the Saints.”

Historian Kathleen Belew is also familiar with the book and others like it — works of fiction like The Turner Diaries, “a piece of dystopic fiction that ends in a nuclear war after which all nonwhites are killed,” as NPR’s Andrew Limbong reported earlier this year. Belew says these novels morph from fiction to reality for white power activists.

“They fill imaginative holes that people can use in organizing, and they provide a map of ideology and operations that spur future activity,” she says.

Belew, a historian at the University of Chicago, wrote Bring the War Home, a book about the roots of white power movements in the United States. She says The Camp of the Saints taps into a central belief of white nationalism: fear around the reproduction of the white race and thusly, the birth of white children.

“We see the birth rate appearing in manifestos of violent actors. But to people in this movement, white reproduction is not just about a peaceful demographic transformation, but it’s about this feeling of being overrun by immigrants, about being threatened with forced integration, and about the idea that the white race is under attack. And I think that sense of emergency that is depicted in works like Camp of the Saints and The Turner Diaries explains how white nationalism becomes such a captivating and world-consuming way of thinking about politics.”….

You got that much right, honey!

Dr. B,b,b,belew