I can't disagree with the person who wrote this: https: //www.dowsocial.com/why-your-social-media ... worthless/
Ben Klassen died in 1993 so he had never heard of Internet social media. Hell, he had likely never even heard of the Internet for that matter. He understood, however, how to get his message of loyalty to one's race across to his fellow fallow Whites. He used the example of sticking to what he knew in tennis as the "high percentage shot." In other words, do not waste your time or your breath on low percentage methods that do not lead to victory. He was right with that simple analogy.
High Percentage Shot: A high percentage shot is one that will most likely fly over the net and land within the court. A typical high percentage shot would be if you hit your forehand cross court 19 out of 20 times, or 95%, that would be considered a high percentage shot because the ball was in play the majority of the time. Low Percentage Shot: On the other hand, a low percentage shot is one that has a lower probability of either flying over the net or landing within the court. Trying to hit close to the lines is a low percentage shot because you have less area for the ball to land on. For example, hitting a line may occur 3/10 or 30% of the time. These are not good odds. Cross court shots have a higher probability of being good then down the line shots. This is due to the fact that the net is usually lower at the center of the court. When you hit a cross court shot, the net is lower, so your shot has more room when going over the net.
Using social media to attract our people to join the National Alliance has proven to be a "low percentage" method with "low odds" for achieving success. Social media can be used to spread links to NA Websites where others can learn what we are all about, but that's about it.
An example of a higher percentage shot in recruiting is after seeing a letter to the editor of a periodical where the writer is determined by you to be an Alliance prospect, and can be identified and tracked down, contact him, talk to him; feel him out. If he is worth it, introduce him to this: https://www.natall.com/about/what-is-th ... -alliance/ He has already shown he has the moral courage to own his words in a public forum. You never know, he may ask you as others have, "Where has the National Alliance been all of my life.?" You may answer, "We sure haven't been on Wikipedia." and explain why.
One on one recruiting doesn't always yield the desired result, but it beats the ineffective blunderbuss method. Think ice pick.