the Inevitable failure of Capitalism

[Jack Pogrom]

If you've watched the documentary "Adolf Hitler the greatest story never told" particularly the ending hour, you see that the Jews used Capitalism in the West as well as Communism in the East to crush National socialism. I suppose the Communist system was much harsher and destructive in the East than Capitalism is and was in the West, but If you have any common sense, you should know that Capitalism is doomed to failure. It's a system in which the 1% dominates the 99%. This may work for a while, as it has but look at America today. Last Week's Wall street Journal said that this new generation that is coming up is suffering conditions as bad or worse since the Great Depression. This will ultimately cause the Goyim to turn into a state of barbarism that was not unlike what Communism did in the East.

[John Calhoun]

We need to get the message out there so that this generation will ultimately break away from system politics. My fear is that they will move towards whatever brand of Communism is trendy in the subculture these days.

Rebirth can only happen when the truth is present in a large way.

[Jack Pogrom]

Capitalism is actually not so bad but only if the nation is more or less racially pure. If you have wealthy Jews running around and do nothing but hoard money with no concern for the future of the lower or middle classes, then It is dangerous for those other classes. Capitalism has to be regulated to a degree, so the rich put their money back into the hands of the poor by stimulating job growth and production. Henry Ford did this by increasing the salaries of his workers. These days we have ultra wealthy Jews who could give a rats ass about Whites or anyone else, and basically are mentally ill, ethnocentric money hoarders. That's why it's so bad right now. The Jews are doing only what's in the interests of the Jews and they don't care about anyone else.

[John Calhoun]

Economics must always be subordinated to the greater interests of the race.

Ownership of private property is desirable.

The problem with modern economics lies in the fact that it constantly hungers for cheap labor. In former times, Blacks were brought in as cheap labor. Now, we have Mexicans.

This is a result of a focus on economics as opposed race.

[Jack Pogrom]

Yes that is true. I suppose for blacks it was a bit different, they were captured by their own tribal leaders and sold to Europeans in exchange for guns and other goods. Then they were brought here to work the plantations (Big mistake!) These days the Mexicans who sneak into this country can find jobs in fruit stands, restaurant kitchens, and other places where they are working more or less in the background. Most of the employers who hire these undocumented workers are small business who's owners are white. If this is the case then every one of the employers that are found to be doing this should be fined or shut down, but they are not scrutinized at all as it has become unfashionable to ask whether so and so Mexican is here legally or not. So the corruption comes from the top but trickles down to the bottom as well. As long as the government is willing to turn a blind eye to illegal immigration, greedy store owners will be willing to employee these illegal aliens just to boost their profit margin a little.

[John Calhoun]

In each case, these third-worlders were brought in as a cheap labor. Blacks were used in the production of sugar, cotton, indigo, tobacco, rice, and etc. As the economy has transitioned away from being primarily agriculture and a series of laws enacted, Hispanics are being brought in for their cheap labor.

The focus must always be on what is good for the race in whatever system is in use. Some folks have produced an idea knownas National-Capitalism but I doubt that this concept could work.

[Jack Pogrom]

I agree with you, whatever it is it should be for the good of the people. And by people i mean race. National Socialism essentially solved this problem, but since we don't want to be carbon copies of Adolf Hitler's regime, I agree a new term would be fitting. I was thinking something like controlled Capitalism. In a way capitalism as it is today is not 100% Laissez Faire. I believe there is a degree of government regulation but surely it is not doing the job right!