Taking Capitalism Away from the Jews

[Reinhard]

LET US AGREE, without rancor, that European Jewry was predisposed to take superior advantage of industrial capitalism as it emerged from European feudalism. A disproportionate number of Jews were engaged in town commerce during the feudal period; and their ethnocentrism is prominent in relation to that of other races. Europeans have not capitalized on international finance in proportion to their contributions in science and industry because they came late to the monetary aspects of commerce, and have comparatively little ethnic cohesion.

Shrewdness in matters of money, together with a highly-developed sense of group self-interest, have given Jews possession of European societies’ cognitive apparatus. They embody the ‘nervous system’ of our body politic, and we are made neurotic by the infection of alien culture. Our lives are directed by signals they generate. These signals arrive principally through entertainment, educational, and monetary channels – the last of these being critical to control of the first two. We incur debt to pay for pastimes that debase us and for information that deludes us.

The Jew has put his money where his tribal interests lie; and this need not be a reproach, for he is only being true to himself and to his own. It is sufficient to observe that his interests are not our interests; and we ultimately have the power to generate cultural signals that will elevate us above the mere material satisfactions proffered by our global elites, and to see our history through our own eyes.

We are told that the Twentieth Century’s wars were essential to preserve liberty against tyranny. They were not. World War I was fought to launch a global materialist order called communism. This war so weakened national regimes that they could not resist immersion in another global materialist order called capitalism. International finance was thereby liberated to develop arbitrary and unsustainable patterns of monetary placement that soon crashed the global economic system.

International capitalism is inherently unstable. It demands access to resources and promotes markets without respect to national sovereignty. The racially detached globalist thinks nothing of preying on coherent populations to the point where their societal order dissolves, and economic activity (at least at a scale required for civility) then becomes impossible.

The nations which became the Axis powers isolated themselves from a degenerate world economy in order to create national economic spheres in which their people might prosper. For this they were punished severely, and forced back into the international materialist syndicate that is now poised for another collapse. Liberty and tyranny were not the antagonists in World War II. The combatants were the combined forces of international materialism (capitalism with communism) on one side versus the nationalist forms of economic order on the other.

We are also told that the social order of industrial nations will collapse unless capital markets are left free to discover the unique optimum implicit in our economic potential. This is true insofar as any dynamic system must always be seeking a uniquely desirable state in order to remain stable. But further assertions that the economic optimum cannot be computed by artificial intelligence constitute an academic fraud – probably the most sinister, long-standing, and savagely defended piece of bunkum since Ptolemaic astronomy.

Clicking over to www.sfecon.com, one sees a succession of all the physical and financial flows, together with the associated prices, by which a general mathematical description of the economy proceeds efficiently from chaos to optimality. Though such demonstrata have been available for decades [1] and have been reviewed favorably in disciplines adjacent to economics [2] the economics profession will demolish anyone attempting to bring them forward. Sources of economic order must, you see, remain a sacred mystery or some sort of ‘miracle’ that can only be appealed-to through the agency of a priestly class.

An efficient, calculable path from economic chaos to economic optimality is subversive in that artificial economic calculation would strengthen nation/states in their resistance to globalist financial tyranny. Solving the computation problem would bring the efficiency of pure buccaneer capitalism (which, truth be told, exists only in the abstract) to regimes of economic command. Economic command is natural and proper to ethnically coherent states: National Socialism can express the goodwill that is spontaneously generated within a self-conscious ethnos; and that goodwill is preserved when a society’s material substrate is managed in a beneficial, transparent, and scientific way.

Economics’ finding that its calculation problem is complex beyond any possibility of solution underlies the ‘science’ of economics as we have it – which, being a Jewish preserve, essentially continues Talmudism but without God. The impossibility of economic calculation originated the atheistic Jew Ludwig von Mises [3] and its most ferocious living exponent is another atheistic Jew, Professor Walter E. Block of Loyola University New Orleans [4]. (Block openly favors reconvening the Nuremberg trials to deal with his ideological opponents [5].)

Though the economic calculation problem is abstruse to a point where only specialists can even state it, its indissolubility is regularly proclaimed through mainstream Neo-conservative and Libertarian media channels. Jonah Goldberg [6] Kevin Williamson [7] Thomas Sowell [8] and Walter Williams [9] have lately been the most insistent popularizers of economic non-computability (in continuation of the Jewish practice of projecting their initiatives through the agency of pliable negroes).

The solved calculation problem at sfecon.com completes a line of development that began with Carl Menger [10] advanced to Vilfredo Pareto [11] and then to Friedrich Hayek [12]. (Their works are now cited to induce almost the exact opposite impressions of what they convey literally.) Noting that SFEcon’s author and his predecessors are all men of European ethnicity [13] we place their achievement within the specifically Western scientific tradition, and in contrast to the Semitic.

Western economics issues from an objectively solved problem that has real benefits to offer – especially elimination of the cycles of boom and bust, reflected in cycles of war and peace, that have plagued Russia, Europe, and the Anglosphere since the mid-Seventeenth Century. This solution’s treatment of value and money exposes the nature of bank tyranny while defining its replacement.

If you can do college-level calculus and program in Excel, then you can master SFEcon’s online e-book. Students doing so become equipped to challenge the Semitic content of their econ courses with objective demonstrations of efficient economic adjustment. Keyboard warriors might find amusement in pushing the evidence embodied in SFEcon’s prototypes onto economics message boards. Those in need of analytic challenges might formulate descriptions of economic potential that would quickly translate into plans for recovery from an economic collapse.

White Nationalism is currently creating meta-political networks that might be engaged by whatever authority emerges to re-order the chaos that will follow an anticipated crash of the international financial system. A cadre advancing European scientific methods into the field of economics would be an important node among these connections. The notion that enlightened economic command can achieve the optimality attributed to free-market capitalism needs propagating; and its acceptance would do much to advance White Nationalist cause.

NOTES:

[1] I was introduced to SFEcon through an MBA course in International Business Economics at the University of San Francisco in 1982.

[2] See for example:

Lang, Paul: “An Essay on SFEcon’s Perfect Markets Model”. Proceedings, International Conference on Complex Systems (ICCS2004), May 16-21 2004.

Ryaboshlyk, Volodymyr: “Issues of Reflection of Heterogeneity in Modern Modelling”. The Ukrainian Journal Economist vol. 4, April 2005.

Sergeyev, Andrey and Moscardini, Alfredo: “Governance of economic transitions: a case study of Ukraine”. Kybernetes, 2006. vol. 35, pp 90-107

[3] Mises, Ludwig (von): “Die Wirtschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen Gemeinwesen” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaften, vol. 47 (1920).

[4] Block, Walter: Labor Economics from a Free Market Perspective: Employing the Unemployable. World Scientific Publishing (2008). P. 128, etc.

[5] See, for example: The Fed as a Criminal Organization. lewrockwell.com, January 23, 2012; and Won’t You Come Back, Alan Greenspan? lewrockwell.com, July 2, 2012

[6] Goldberg, Jonah: ‘The Value of Everything’. National Review Online, April 5, 2014

[7] Williamson, Kevin: ‘The Cloud in the Machine’. National Review Online, May 22, 2014; as well as his CSPAN interview of Burton Folsom.

[8] Sowell, Thomas: Marxism: Philosophy and Economics. Quill (1985).

[9] Williams, Walter: ‘The pretense of knowledge’. townhall.com, 12 July 2006.

[10] Menger, Carl: Principles of Economics. (1871)

[11] Pareto, Vilfredo: Manual of Political Economy. (1927)

[12] Hayek, Friedrich August (von): “The Use of Knowledge in Society”. American Economic Association: American Economic Review. XXXV, No. 4, 1945, pp. 519-30.

[13] Kurt Roemer’s ethnos is established by this reaction to his academic manifestation:
http://www.sfecon.com/1_Discussions/12_ ... tition.pdf