WHAT IS YOUR ETHNICITY ESTIMATE? ARYAN CIVILIZATION
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:39 am
HOW TO PREVENT MISCEGENATION
Why not do your part by having your own DNA tested If you believe that miscegenation threatens the survival of White civilization? Why let miscegenation bother you otherwise? You will be pleased with the results of your DNA test no matter what they are.
For example, the percentages at the bottom of this page were copied from a table at http://WWW.ANCESTRY.COM about my estimated ethnicity (my ancestors were mostly Celts, Anglo-Saxons (i.e., Germans) and Vikings, and possibly a Roman soldier thrown in). Other DNA testing companies may have different estimates. Estimates may improve in the future.
How can one be sure of one's ancestry unless one has a DNA test? I read that Whites are about 50% of the ancestors of mulattoes who were born in the north-eastern USA, and that Negroes are about 1% of the ancestors of the average
American in the USA who considers himself to be totally White. These percentages are rapidly changing for the worse unfortunately (thanks to our Jewish brain worms and their subservient politicians).
I recommend Ancestry.com for autosomal tests because it allows one to compare one's family tree and DNA test results to those of over a million other Ancestry.com customers. This makes it easier for one to understand one's kinship to some of the thousands of biological cousins who descend from over 100 of one's great-great-great-great-great-grandparents.
Autosomal tests cost about $100 and even less during sales, e.g., during holidays when business may be slower.
--
WHO IS A RACIST?
My definition of a racist is anyone whose feelings, behavior, etc. is influenced by her/his knowledge of the ancestry of ANYONE for ANY reason., e.g., every mother prefers her own child and vice versa. I and everyone else of course is a born racist throughout our lives even if a Jew-worshiping preacher has shamed us into believing otherwise. Can anyone who is sane enough to accept the truth have a different opinion?
I must be a racist, since mulattoes disgust me so much that I usually either cut the TV off, or change the channel as soon as I see one (I do not watch sports teams and much TV). That does not mean that I hate anyone because of her/his ancestry. My opinion that our civilization would have a far better chance of survival if the war criminal Lincoln had removed every last Negro from the USA is based on my understanding of the truth, not on "prejudice".
I greatly admire the intelligence of some mulattoes, e.g., Neil deGrasse Tyson (see his beautiful article about "What Science Is -- and How and Why It Works" at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/neil-degr ... 95642.html. Despite his looks, I suspect that only a small percentage of Neil deGrasse Tyson's ancestors were Negroes. That some mulattoes are intelligent does not keep me from understanding that there is a profound and very important difference between every individual and between every race.
--
WHY ARE ARYANS THE MOST CIVILIZED RACE?
Superior intelligence does not explain why White nations are more secure and prosperous (despite their Jewish brain worms) than non-White nations. White nations are more secure and prosperous because they are more civilized. Aryan nations are more civilized (and beautiful) because their ancestors practiced eugenics. I doubt that many of the domesticated plants and animals upon which we depend for our survival would exist otherwise.
Our Aryan ancestors practiced eugenics for thousands of years longer than any other race because they were the FIRST farmers and had to remove dangerous criminals (and other animals) from their permanent farming communities. White crime rates would be a high as those of any other race otherwise, and their homelands would be no more secure than those in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East.
The ancestors of all races were savage hunter-gatherers who had to be far more intelligent than the average person who is alive today. Only the most intelligent hunter-gatherers could survive in the African Sahel. They had to be able to process information quickly in order to compete with lions even though they had only sticks and stones.
The ancestors of all Eurasian races evolved in the Sahel for tens of thousands of years before they left Africa. The racial differences between Eurasian races would be quite small if all of them had left Africa at the same time (as most scientists now assume).
They left Africa at various times because of four severe droughts that were caused by the last glaciation (lower global temperatures reduce evaporation from the oceans). The population of the Sahelian survivors of these four droughts rapidly increased as soon as rainfall and game became more plentiful. Those who survived without leaving the Sahel became a different race from those who left tens of thousands of years earlier. When the next drought occurred their population declined again, and motivated some members of that race to leave Africa and to settle in a homeland that could be conquered, or that was uninhabited.
The ancestors of Aryans would never have become farmers if they had found an uninhabited homeland where game was plentiful after they left the Sahel about 20 KYA (during the Last Glacial Maximum). They would have been killed for trespassing if they had NOT remained in the Fertile Crescent. Aryans are the most heat-adapted race because their ancestors survived in the Sahel longer than any other race. The three races that left the Sahel first settled where Mongoloids and Europeans now live. Australoids moved to where they now live because Mongoloids displaced them.
Game was so scarce in the Fertile Crescent that the ancestors of Aryans had to eat, and eventually to cultivate, wild grass seed in order to avoid starvation. The cultures that they created in the Fertile Crescent over ten thousand years ago are called Natufian http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Natufian and Kebaran http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Kebaran.
The descendants of the Semitic herdsmen who began to plunder and enslave (and eventually to destroy) Aryan civilization in the Fertile Crescent about five or six thousand years ago now loudly and proudly proclaim that their shepherd ancestors were the first farmers, and even that Semites created the Natufian and Kebaran cultures. Why allow this apparent lie to go unchallenged on the Internet? Are most Aryans too brain-washed to recognize the apparent truth when they see it?
I wonder if this post will still be on the Internet a few years from now. By then most scientists will have realized that what I wrote above is true
--
SOME OF MY DNA TEST RESULTS
REGION / APPROXIMATE AMOUNT
Europe 100%
Europe West 50%, Ireland 30%, Great Britain 12%.
Trace Regions 8%: Scandinavia 3%, Finland/Northwest Russia 2%, Iberian Peninsula 2%, Italy/Greece 1%
Africa 0%
Other Regions Tested: Benin/Togo 0%, Ivory Coast/Ghana 0%, Africa Southeastern Bantu 0%, Senegal 0%, Nigeria 0%, Mali 0%, Cameroon/Congo 0%, Africa South-Central Hunter-Gatherers 0%, Africa North 0%
America 0%
Other Regions Tested: Native American 0%
Asia 0%
Other Regions Tested Asia East 0%, Asia Central 0%, Asia South 0%
Other Regions Tested:
Europe East 0%, European Jewish 0%, Pacific Islander 0%
Other Regions Tested:
Melanesia 0%, Polynesia 0%, West Asia 0%,
Other Regions Tested: Middle East 0%, Caucasus 0%
Why not do your part by having your own DNA tested If you believe that miscegenation threatens the survival of White civilization? Why let miscegenation bother you otherwise? You will be pleased with the results of your DNA test no matter what they are.
For example, the percentages at the bottom of this page were copied from a table at http://WWW.ANCESTRY.COM about my estimated ethnicity (my ancestors were mostly Celts, Anglo-Saxons (i.e., Germans) and Vikings, and possibly a Roman soldier thrown in). Other DNA testing companies may have different estimates. Estimates may improve in the future.
How can one be sure of one's ancestry unless one has a DNA test? I read that Whites are about 50% of the ancestors of mulattoes who were born in the north-eastern USA, and that Negroes are about 1% of the ancestors of the average
American in the USA who considers himself to be totally White. These percentages are rapidly changing for the worse unfortunately (thanks to our Jewish brain worms and their subservient politicians).
I recommend Ancestry.com for autosomal tests because it allows one to compare one's family tree and DNA test results to those of over a million other Ancestry.com customers. This makes it easier for one to understand one's kinship to some of the thousands of biological cousins who descend from over 100 of one's great-great-great-great-great-grandparents.
Autosomal tests cost about $100 and even less during sales, e.g., during holidays when business may be slower.
--
WHO IS A RACIST?
My definition of a racist is anyone whose feelings, behavior, etc. is influenced by her/his knowledge of the ancestry of ANYONE for ANY reason., e.g., every mother prefers her own child and vice versa. I and everyone else of course is a born racist throughout our lives even if a Jew-worshiping preacher has shamed us into believing otherwise. Can anyone who is sane enough to accept the truth have a different opinion?
I must be a racist, since mulattoes disgust me so much that I usually either cut the TV off, or change the channel as soon as I see one (I do not watch sports teams and much TV). That does not mean that I hate anyone because of her/his ancestry. My opinion that our civilization would have a far better chance of survival if the war criminal Lincoln had removed every last Negro from the USA is based on my understanding of the truth, not on "prejudice".
I greatly admire the intelligence of some mulattoes, e.g., Neil deGrasse Tyson (see his beautiful article about "What Science Is -- and How and Why It Works" at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/neil-degr ... 95642.html. Despite his looks, I suspect that only a small percentage of Neil deGrasse Tyson's ancestors were Negroes. That some mulattoes are intelligent does not keep me from understanding that there is a profound and very important difference between every individual and between every race.
--
WHY ARE ARYANS THE MOST CIVILIZED RACE?
Superior intelligence does not explain why White nations are more secure and prosperous (despite their Jewish brain worms) than non-White nations. White nations are more secure and prosperous because they are more civilized. Aryan nations are more civilized (and beautiful) because their ancestors practiced eugenics. I doubt that many of the domesticated plants and animals upon which we depend for our survival would exist otherwise.
Our Aryan ancestors practiced eugenics for thousands of years longer than any other race because they were the FIRST farmers and had to remove dangerous criminals (and other animals) from their permanent farming communities. White crime rates would be a high as those of any other race otherwise, and their homelands would be no more secure than those in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East.
The ancestors of all races were savage hunter-gatherers who had to be far more intelligent than the average person who is alive today. Only the most intelligent hunter-gatherers could survive in the African Sahel. They had to be able to process information quickly in order to compete with lions even though they had only sticks and stones.
The ancestors of all Eurasian races evolved in the Sahel for tens of thousands of years before they left Africa. The racial differences between Eurasian races would be quite small if all of them had left Africa at the same time (as most scientists now assume).
They left Africa at various times because of four severe droughts that were caused by the last glaciation (lower global temperatures reduce evaporation from the oceans). The population of the Sahelian survivors of these four droughts rapidly increased as soon as rainfall and game became more plentiful. Those who survived without leaving the Sahel became a different race from those who left tens of thousands of years earlier. When the next drought occurred their population declined again, and motivated some members of that race to leave Africa and to settle in a homeland that could be conquered, or that was uninhabited.
The ancestors of Aryans would never have become farmers if they had found an uninhabited homeland where game was plentiful after they left the Sahel about 20 KYA (during the Last Glacial Maximum). They would have been killed for trespassing if they had NOT remained in the Fertile Crescent. Aryans are the most heat-adapted race because their ancestors survived in the Sahel longer than any other race. The three races that left the Sahel first settled where Mongoloids and Europeans now live. Australoids moved to where they now live because Mongoloids displaced them.
Game was so scarce in the Fertile Crescent that the ancestors of Aryans had to eat, and eventually to cultivate, wild grass seed in order to avoid starvation. The cultures that they created in the Fertile Crescent over ten thousand years ago are called Natufian http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Natufian and Kebaran http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Kebaran.
The descendants of the Semitic herdsmen who began to plunder and enslave (and eventually to destroy) Aryan civilization in the Fertile Crescent about five or six thousand years ago now loudly and proudly proclaim that their shepherd ancestors were the first farmers, and even that Semites created the Natufian and Kebaran cultures. Why allow this apparent lie to go unchallenged on the Internet? Are most Aryans too brain-washed to recognize the apparent truth when they see it?
I wonder if this post will still be on the Internet a few years from now. By then most scientists will have realized that what I wrote above is true
--
SOME OF MY DNA TEST RESULTS
REGION / APPROXIMATE AMOUNT
Europe 100%
Europe West 50%, Ireland 30%, Great Britain 12%.
Trace Regions 8%: Scandinavia 3%, Finland/Northwest Russia 2%, Iberian Peninsula 2%, Italy/Greece 1%
Africa 0%
Other Regions Tested: Benin/Togo 0%, Ivory Coast/Ghana 0%, Africa Southeastern Bantu 0%, Senegal 0%, Nigeria 0%, Mali 0%, Cameroon/Congo 0%, Africa South-Central Hunter-Gatherers 0%, Africa North 0%
America 0%
Other Regions Tested: Native American 0%
Asia 0%
Other Regions Tested Asia East 0%, Asia Central 0%, Asia South 0%
Other Regions Tested:
Europe East 0%, European Jewish 0%, Pacific Islander 0%
Other Regions Tested:
Melanesia 0%, Polynesia 0%, West Asia 0%,
Other Regions Tested: Middle East 0%, Caucasus 0%