Clintons don't like his otherwise lovely portrait

Works that stir the soul
Post Reply
User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Clintons don't like his otherwise lovely portrait

Post by Will Williams » Thu Oct 20, 2016 3:21 pm

Controversial Clinton portrait with Lewinsky reference isn't on display
Lori Grisham - USA TODAY
March 3, 2015

Image
The National Portrait Gallery commonly rotates through exhibits and sometimes work is removed from public view for a period of time, Bethany Bentley, a spokesperson for the museum told the USA TODAY Network.

"It was not taken off view because of any outside requests," Bentley said. :roll:

The gallery has space for 900 works to be displayed at any one time out of a collection of more than 22,000 items, she said. The gallery unveiled the portrait to the public in 2006 and it hung on and off through August of 2009. In 2011, it was on loan for a traveling display in Russia. The gallery does not have any future rotations scheduled right now, according to Bentley.

"It's been cycled right down to the storage area permanently," Shanks said about the painting's more-than-five-year hiatus from the gallery.

The blue dress

Shanks sees himself as a biographer and said his portraits capture the subject's personality and story. For Clinton, that meant portraying the 42nd president in a casual pose.

"In the presidency, [Clinton] had a certain amount of panache, a little bit of swagger. He didn't stand nor act like a mannequin. That swagger and that sense of self was very present and I tried to get exactly that in the painting," Shanks said.

Another undeniable part of his legacy is Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky.

"I felt it necessary to depart from complete naiveté in the painting and put in a subtle, subtle shadow across his presidency," he said.

To get the right effect, Shanks says he went through various props for something to cast the shadow. That's when he happened upon a blue dress and decided it was fitting since Lewinsky's blue dress, which had DNA that matched Clinton's, became a central part of the scandal.

A photo taken by USA TODAY in 2005 shows Shanks in his studio working on the painting with a blue dress hanging on coat rack casting a shadow onto the scene...

Image
With a replica of the fireplace in the Oval Office set up in his studio, artist Nelson Shanks works on a portrait of former president Bill Clinton. There is a blue dress set up in the studio casting a shadow on the set. Shanks recently told reporters that the shadow represents Monica Lewinsky. (Photo: 2005 photo by Eileen Blass, USA TODAY)

More, here:http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... /24318563/

Note: Mr. Shanks died in August, 2015. He was 77.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
C.E. Whiteoak
Posts: 369
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 7:45 pm

Re: Clintons don't like his otherwise lovely portrait

Post by C.E. Whiteoak » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:03 pm

It could have been a lot worse. :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Jim Mathias
Posts: 3292
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:48 pm

Re: Clintons don't like his otherwise lovely portrait

Post by Jim Mathias » Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:37 pm

Would've been better had Shanks painted Slick Willie's fly open for the sake of accurately portraying his character (or lack thereof)... :P
Activism materials available! ===> Contact me via PM to obtain quantities of the "Send Them Back", "NA Health Warning #1 +#2+#3" stickers, and any fliers listed in the Alliance website's flier webpage.

User avatar
Wade Hampton III
Posts: 2339
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Clintons don't like his otherwise lovely portrait

Post by Wade Hampton III » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:15 am

Jim Mathias wrote:Would've been better had Shanks painted Slick Willie's fly open for the sake of accurately portraying his character (or lack thereof)... :P
Actually, I thought that is what he was getting ready to do. Either that, or he was looking for another
cigar!

:roll:

Post Reply