Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Fundamental ideas
Mike Sullivan

Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Mike Sullivan » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:25 am

As Western Christianity merges with the value system of Cultural Marxism, this becomes a real question. Take these recent news items:

- US Lutheran churches have made $30 million from government grants and contracts in flooding the USA with Third World refugees.


- Brenda Walker: “Conspirators In Cassocks: Catholic Bishops (But Not Laity) Betraying America“


- Pope Francis visits Lampedusa to pray for African invasion of Europe.


- “Conservative” Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission president Russell Moore’s Evangelical Immigration Table is a George Soros front group hell-bent on flooding USA with Third World.


- Dennis Mangan: "The One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic, Open-Borders Church"


- John Derbyshire: “White Flight from Christianity?“


In evolutionary terms, has mainstream Christianity become maladaptive for the West?

http://occamsrazormag.wordpress.com/201 ... n-peoples/

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5381
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Gotta watch this Rev. Dr. preach to his flock of black sheep

Post by Will Williams » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:08 pm

Mike Sullivan wrote: John Derbyshire: “White Flight from Christianity?“
A White Flight From Christianity?
By John Derbyshire on October 23, 2013

My video clip of the week, perhaps the year, is this one of Vincent Stewart, a/k/a/ Reverend X, preaching God’s Word. The whole thing is 13 minutes, but here’s a flavor:

(1m26s, responding to a phone-in caller): Repeat it after me, bitch. I come in the name of Jesus by the power of the Holy Spirit. God Almighty, you know? Ruler of heaven and earth and every goddam thing in between...

(3m38s, different caller): What do you know about the Lord? [repeated twice.] Now tell me. I come in the name of Jesus by the power of the Holy Spirit. Let’s stay focused. You wan’ see [?] you own flesh. You wan’... ’Cause you see flesh an’ s--t, and whitey always told you, “Oh, a man can’t be God.” Huh? What you callin’ me for? I told you what I’m about. It’s about getting lawyers and training them up in the word of the Scriptures, and we’re going to help the poor, the fatherless that can’t afford...that can’t afford they, um, legal...legality. See, they can’t...they can’t afford justice. I know you all live for justice, huh, just like the white supremaciss, huh. White supremaciss preachin’ justice fo’ yo ass to spare you from the noose, blaaack maaaan! . . .

(10m52s, different caller, who had accused Rev. X of “corrupt communications”): Your motherf-----g communication is corrupted! Whatever! Whatever! Then I’m wrong! You got me now! [repeated twice.] You figured me out! You f-----g nincom-f-----g-poop! . . .



You get the idea. It’s a down-market version of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright. The same things are there, only more coarsely expressed: the everlasting rancor of the black, his hatred of “whitey,” the crude socialism and talk of “justice,” the obsessive imagery of nooses. This is Black Liberation Theology for the ghetto crowd.

To judge by the social successes of Rev. Wright and his most notable parishioner, this is now mainstream black Christianity, objected to by nobody much. As Patrick Buchanan has remarked:

That Wright is a revered preacher in black America also tells us that, far from coming together, we Americans are further apart than we were in the 1950s, when Negroes could be described as Christian, conservative and patriotic. Malcolm X and Elijah Muhammad did not speak for black America then. Roy Wilkins, Whitney Young and Dr. Martin Luther King did.
I pulled that Reverend X clip from a posting at the Occam’s Razor blog. The blog’s author, Alfred Clark, is arguing that Christianity is becoming a ghetto religion, with less and less appeal to white people.

This would be a remarkable development, if it’s actually happening. Of the three Abrahamic religions, only one is tribal—that is, yoked to a single ethny. The other two are universalist, and have been for centuries.

The main body of the Christian Church has of course been European since the early centuries, but the Gospel of Christ has been preached successfully in Beijing and Bombay, Nairobi and Nagasaki, Samoa and Seoul. My vague impression—I can’t claim to be well-informed about this—is that Islam has been even more successful in maintaining its appeal to many widely different peoples.

Not that there weren’t always tribal divisions within Christianity. The Greek-Latin split, though always described as doctrinal, surely had an ethnic component. So did the Reformation: The Germans were restive under Papal authority long before Luther showed up—think of the last act of Tannhäuser.

Likewise with the English, as seen in the 12th-century dispute between Henry II and his Archbishop.

The Church of England is quite distinctly tribal, for all the guff about the “worldwide Anglican community.” May I quote myself, please? Thank you:

[English people’s] self-identification as Christians has very little to do with Christ or the Bible. They were no more Christian than British Astronomer Martin Rees (nowadays Lord Rees), who told Richard Dawkins that he goes to church “as an unbelieving Anglican . . . out of loyalty to the tribe.” (Compare English über-patriot George Orwell's remark that “I like the Church of England better than Our Lord.”)

—We Are Doomed, Chapter 8.
Still, believing Christians worldwide read the same Bible, worshiped the same God, and acknowledged Christ as his son and their Savior. Christendom held together somehow as a European-dominated religion.

If Alfred Clark is right, that centuries-long universalism may be drawing to a close. Much of Europe is no longer significantly Christian, and the same corrosive trends are present here. Pew Research reported last October that

The number of Americans who do not identify with any religion continues to grow at a rapid pace. One-fifth of the U.S. public—and a third of adults under 30—are religiously unaffiliated today, the highest percentages ever in Pew Research Center polling.
If—it is hard to tell from the Pew numbers—the decline in faith is stronger among whites, it will become self-reinforcing. Christianity will, as Alfred Clark is predicting, fall prey to white flight.

Leaders of the big organized Christian churches seem to be trying to accelerate the process. The response of Pope Francis to the rising tide of economic migrants from Africa trying to break into Europe was to visit the overwhelmed Italian island of Lampedusa and criticize the “indifference” shown to the Africans—as if their journeys were not perfectly voluntary, and the besieged Italians of Lampedusa were not entitled to feel themselves victims of Papal indifference.

Over in England, meanwhile, the Archbishop of Canterbury has praised the churches founded by Caribbean immigrants as “the strongest in the country.” Ann Corcoran at Refugee Resettlement Watch has a long paper trail on the strenuous efforts by the Lutheran Church to assist in transforming the demography of the U.S.A.

That third Abrahamic religion—the explicitly tribal one—has, at least in its homeland, taken an approach directed more to ethnic self-preservation than to self-annihilation. How long can it be before this is generally noticed?

When I wrote We Are Doomed five years ago, I assumed that we would see a general ebbing of “organized, churched religion,” leaving us with “vague dreams of transcendence.”

At that time I had not read Eric Kaufmann’s book Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth? (because he hadn’t yet written it). Kaufmann crunches the demographic numbers, noting the very high fertility of fundamentalist Christians, Mormons, Jews, and Moslems. He concludes that, yes, the religious shall inherit the earth. However, as I noted in my Takimag review:

The religion dominating the world of our grandchildren will not be the subtle intellectualism of Christian seminaries—of a Tillich, a Niebuhr, a Küng. It will be the literalist-fundamentalist obscurantism of Muslim Salafis, Jewish “Ultras,” Young Earth Creationists, and Mormon splinter sects. In a world dominated by these closed-minded babblers, what place will there be for literature, science, free inquiry, or freedom of any kind?

God help us! Though of course, if fanatical devotion is what He wants, He’s more likely to help them.
I guess that would include the Reverend X.
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Wade Hampton III
Posts: 2339
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Wade Hampton III » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:16 am

Wade says, "I have heard that the definition of
insanity is doing the same thing over and over
again and expecting a different result each time!"

http://www.cbn.com/spirituallife/church ... tion=print

After Chuck Colson's release from prison, he began
his prison ministry. In the early years, he visited
Columbia, South Carolina, to speak at our Governor's
Prayer Breakfast and Columbia International University.
I'll never forget walking into our den and catching him
doing the unthinkable -- smoking a cigarette. The horror
on my face startled him into confession. "Ginny, please
understand, I'm a work in progress, and smoking's been a
part of my life for 30 years. I'm trying to break a tough
habit."

Wade questions...don't do as I do, do as I say?


:lol:

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5381
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Will Williams » Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:33 am

Image
Hypocrite Colson with his phony born again prison conversion
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Wade Hampton III
Posts: 2339
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Wade Hampton III » Wed Sep 03, 2014 8:10 am

You can’t just blame it all on the Jews. Sure, it was
Sephardic Jews that were behind the Portuguese efforts
to circumvent the Venetian-Arab monopoly on spice import
to Europe, bringing misery and death on tens of millions
of Africans and Asians. It was the Sephardic Jew Cristobal
Colombo and his brother who slowly roasted to death millions
of Native Americans on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola.
It was Sephardic Jews who controlled the slave trade between
African and the American colonies. It was Sephardic Jews
that were behind the genocidal Dutch spice trade that wiped
out entire islands in SE Asia to ensure their production monopoly.
It was Sephardic Jews from Iraq and India who flooded China
with Opium from Afghanistan. It was Ashkenazi Jews who
exploited and mistreated Russian and Ukrainian peasants
to an extent that their life was no better than that of
a prisoner in a Stalinist Gulag. It is Sephardic and Ashkenazi
Jews that are running the show in the United States, leading
it to war after war for the benefit of Jewish controlled
multi-national corporations and investment banks. But it
is always equally greedy and psychopathic “Christians”
who are making those Jewish crimes possible by providing
them with the necessary legal, political and military support.

http://therebel.org/en/editorial/639599 ... rostitutes

Jews make up less than 0.25% of the world’s population.
They can hold as many key positions in whatever area of
society they want; they cannot control us without a sufficient
number of us collaborating with them. Those pimps and prostitutes
within our ranks are an even bigger problem than those parasitic
monsters themselves.

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5381
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Will Williams » Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:01 pm

It looks like we can blame at least one White death on Christianity.
---

Mom kills son believing boy would be better off in heaven
December 17, 2014 by Michael Stone

A Kansas woman has been charged with first-degree murder after she beat and stabbed her 10-year-old son to death believing the boy would be better off in heaven, free from future suffering.

Lindsey Blansett was charged with first-degree murder on Tuesday, Dec. 16, after allegedly killing her 10-year-old son, Caleb. Court documents state that on Sunday, December 14, Blansett unlawfully, intentionally and with premeditation killed her son.

Image
Caleb and Lindsey Blansett

The following is a graphic excerpt from the criminal complaint filed by Sumner County Attorney Kerwin Spencer:

“…after her son, CB, age ten, had gone to bed, she (Blansett) decided his life would be full of suffering and pain and that it would be better for him to go to heaven tonight. She took a knife and rock into his bedroom, struck him with the rock and stabbed him with the knife multiple times until he was dead.”

Bond for Blansett was set at $500,000. She’s expected to be back in court on Thursday.

Struggling to wrap his mind around what happened, Clint Blansett, Caleb’s father, said he feels robbed of his life with his son. But even during such a trying time, he says his faith is what’s getting him through:

“Caleb was an angel, he was an angel and I know without a doubt in my mind he’s sitting at the right hand of Jesus…”

And the madness continues…

Read more: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressiv ... z3MN2jq7hQ
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

User avatar
Will Williams
Posts: 5381
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 9:22 am

Re: Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Will Williams » Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:29 pm

Will Williams wrote:It looks like we can blame at least one White death on Christianity.
---
“Caleb was an angel, he was an angel and I know without a doubt in my mind he’s sitting at the right hand of Jesus…”

And the madness continues…
An all-time favorite movie scene (@ 1:45): http://movieclips.com/NCqa8-death-wish- ... -in-jesus/
[youtube]http://movieclips.com/NCqa8-death-wish- ... -in-jesus/[/youtube]

Bronson: “Do you believe in Jesus?”
Bad Guy: “ Yes.”
Bronson: “Well, you’re gonna meet him.”
If Whites insist on participating in "social media," do so on ours, not (((theirs))). Like us on WhiteBiocentrism.com; follow us on NationalVanguard.org. ᛉ

Cosmotheist

Re: Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Cosmotheist » Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:11 am

Christianity and Communism: Jewish Twins
from Nature's Eternal Religion
by Ben Klassen, 1972

Image
To hear the Kosher Konservatives tell it, a fierce, intensive battle is raging today between the evil forces of communism and the sacred forces of Christianity. We are led to believe that it is an all out battle between good and evil. We are told that these two forces are the very essence of two poles of opposition — in complete and diametrical conflict. It is a sham battle. The fact is they are both degenerate products of the collective Jewish mind, designed to do one and the same thing — to destroy the White Race. If we take a closer look at these two evil forces that have bedeviled and tormented the minds of the White Race for all these years, we find that they are not on opposite sides at all. We find that they are both on the side of international Jewry, doing the job they were designed to do, namely: confuse and confound the White Man's intelligence so that he himself will help the Jew in destroying the White Race.

In comparing the two we find that they are strikingly similar, and not opposites. In fact, there are so many similarities in the two programs and in the philosophy of these two creeds that the hand of the same author can easily be detected. That author is the International Jewish network. They and they alone wrote both the creed of Christianity and the creed of communism. Both communism and Christianity preach against materialism. Communism designates those productive and creative forces of our society to which we owe in such large part the benefits of a productive White civilization, as "bourgeois." It then lashes out with unparalleled fury at the bourgeois and tells us over and over again that they must be destroyed. Instead of giving credit where credit is due, it slanders and vilifies these constructive and productive elements, namely the bourgeois or the capitalists, as the ultimate in evil.

Christianity tells us basically the same thing. It tells us that it will be more difficult for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get to heaven. It tells us that we should "sell all thou hast and give it to the poor," an insidious piece of advice that, if followed, would make us all a pack of roving bums and beggars. It would most surely cause the breakdown of our society. Christianity further tells us "lay not up treasures on earth, but lay up treasures in heaven." Throughout, the implication is clear. Don't accumulate unto yourself any of the good things in life. If, through hard work, you've already managed to accumulate some wealth, get rid of it, give it away, give it to the poor, above all, give it to the Church, they'll take it, with relish. The net result of this fantastically bad advice, of course, is that it will more easily pass into the hands of the Jews, who do not subscribe to such foolishness. They hope to make fools of us, knowing very well the old saying "A fool and his money are soon parted," is only too true.

The other side of the coin is that the leaders of both Christianity and communism themselves are fantastically materialistic. When we look at the Catholic Church on down through the ages, we find that whereas they were extracting the last mite from the poor widow, the church itself was gathering up and hoarding gold, silver and precious gems in unbelievable quantities. Not only was it taking in and gathering all the gold, silver and precious stones that it could, but it acquired huge amounts of real estate, and the Catholic Church today is undoubtedly the most fantastically wealthy institution on the face of the earth. Even through the Dark Ages when poverty was widespread, mostly because of Christianity itself, we find these huge and fabulously rich cathedrals, built in the midst of poverty, with gold encrusted altars and apses and vaults and columns and walls. The leadership of the Church caused to be built huge and great Basilicas, Cathedrals, Abbeys, Baptisteries, Mausoleums, Convents, and Churches. Practically all of these were so lavish and so huge in comparison with the meager surroundings of the times, that they flamboyantly stood out as the main repository of all the material wealth — gold, silver and architectural lavishness — of both their era and their geographical location. The church never has bothered to explain why it was so necessary to have such lavish wealth on display to the worshipping faithful, who were told time and again that it was evil to "lay up treasures." Unto this day, churches are built to be flamboyant, garish and bizarre. Money seems to be no object.

The Vatican, that citadel of "spiritual" leadership, which also preaches, "lay not up treasures on earth," does not practice what it preaches. On the contrary, what it practices is indeed the height of hypocrisy, and the antithesis of spirituality. It goes all out for laying up treasures on earth. It has amassed unto itself a portfolio of 5.6 billion dollars in stocks alone, not to mention all of its real estate, art treasures and other valuables. It enjoys an annual income of 1.5 billion dollars, much of it undoubtedly collected from the "widow's last mite," as well as its vast holdings. Next Back Home The United States religious establishment as a whole is valued at 102 billion dollars. In 1969, of the 17.6 billion dollars United States individuals contributed to charity, 45 percent, or 7.9 billion dollars was earmarked for religious purposes. Pretty materialistic for a religion that "shuns" earthly treasures and preaches "my kingdom is not of this world."

Likewise, the communist bosses in Russia, practically all of which are Jews, have accumulated unto themselves all the riches of the countryside. While the communist slave laborer is toiling away twelve hours a day and then comes home to a dingy, dirty, filthy, crowded little apartment shared with other families, his Jewish bosses have opulent palaces spread all over the countryside. They drive the best of cars, chauffeur driven, of course, and eat the best of foods. Not only that, but they have the best of planes at their disposal to fly wherever they see fit to govern their slave laborers. These Jewish communist bosses usually also have at their disposal imported clothes and tailors and a galaxy of servants. When they need a rest from running their slave empire, they have private villas on the Black Sea or other choice vacation spots at their beck and call. And so it goes in the Proletarian Worker's Paradise.

Let us pass on to the next similarity. Both communism and Christianity make extensive use of the weapons of terror, both psychological and real. Undoubtedly the most ghoulish and vicious concept ever contrived by the depraved and collective mind of Jewry is the concept of hell. Can you think of anything more horrible than placing millions of people in confinement in a superheated torture chamber and then burning them forever and ever without even the mitigating mercy of allowing them to die? With this piece of "Good News," and "Joyful Tidings," Christianity set out to conquer the minds of its superstitious and unreasoning victims. The fact that such a torture chamber was non-existent did not at all detract from the fact that it was a real threat to those who were made to believe that it was real. To a child, for instance, if you tell him that the Boogieman is going to get him, and he innocently believes you, then the threat is just as real as if a Boogieman actually existed. And so it is with hell. To those that have become convinced that it exists, this horrible threat is just as real as if it did exist.

However, Christianity did not stop with using psychological terror alone. Those who deviated from the official church line were declared as heretics and forthwith burned at the stake. The idea of using fire in one form or another as a means of torturing their opponents seems to have obsessed these "loving" Christians' minds. According to van Braght's famous Martyr's Mirror, some 33,000 Christians were put to death by other so-called Christians by means of burning at the stake, a grizzly type of revenge. Among my ancestors alone (who were of the Mennonite faith) some 2,000 martyrs were burned at the stake by these ever-loving Christians. One outstanding feature about this burning at the stake business was that they were always White people who were being burned. Never have I ever heard of a Jew being burned at the stake for not believing precisely along specified lines of Judaism, even though they did not believe in Christ at all. Burning at the stake wasn't the only means of torture and death used by these love-dispensing Christians who were so eager lo spread their message of love.

During the Inquisition, and other times, all the beastly refinements of torture that the depraved human mind could devise were used to extort confessions and whip the unbelievers or heretics into line. The thumb-screw, water-dip, the iron corset, drawn and quartered, gouging out one's eyes with hot irons, and the rack (slowly tearing limb from body by means of stretching) were but some of the devices used by these ever-loving Christians to spread their gospel of Love. When the communists came along and used physical torture as one of their instruments of conquest, they had very little left to invent but what the Christians had already utilized before them. And this is as can be expected, since it was Jewish fiendishness that designed the means of torture for both. Nor did the Church hesitate to use wholesale warfare to batter down whole nations that did not submit to their religious dictation. In fact during the 16th, 17th and 18th century the main causes of war were religious dissentions in which one religious group sought to force their beliefs on their opposites by wholesale warfare and slaughter. The communist record of using wholesale terror, both psychological and physical, is so recent, so widespread and so well known that we need hardly review it here.

In Russia alone the Jewish communist regime used terror on a scale unknown before in the annals of history. In order to exterminate the best of the White Race in Russia, namely the White Russians, the Jews slaughtered some 20,000,000. The terror, the killings, the murders that are going on in Russia today defy the imagination of the average White Man's mind. In any case, both communism and Christianity are using, and have used, terror extensively, both psychological and physical, to subjugate their victims. Whereas the Christians excelled in psychological terror, the communists excel in physical terror. But in both cases the Jews were experts in using whatever type of terror best accomplished their ends. Both communism and Christianity have a book that presumably lays down the creed of their movement. Christianity has the Jewish bible which was written by Jews, mostly about Jews, for the purpose of uniting the Jewish race and for destroying the White Race.

The communist bible is Karl Marx's Das Kapital and the Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx in conjunction with Friedrich Engels, both of whom were Jews. Both of these Jewish creeds, communism and Christianity, are highly destructive, and when followed, tear down the fabric of the society that has fallen victim to them. Christianity teaches the evilness of man, that he is a no-good, unworthy sinner, that he is born in sin and that his every instinct is evil. Communism preaches that the productive, creative element of our society, namely the "bourgeois" as they call them, is rotten and evil, and must be destroyed. It can be safely said that any sound, healthy society that turned either to complete Christianity and practiced all of its principles, or any society that practiced pure communism, would soon destroy itself.

Again we want to vigorously point out that contrary to what these Kosher Konservatives are always telling us, communism is by no means the same as socialism or collectivism. The latter are basic constructive elements of any healthy society, but communism is an undisguised Jewish slave-labor camp. Since I have gone into this matter in considerable detail in another chapter, we will not take further space to review this idea here. Both communism and Christianity preach the equality of man. Christianity preaches that we are all equal in the eyes of the Lord, whereas the communists preach that we all must become equal in the communist society. The latter argue that the only reason we are not equal is entirely due to environment, and this little quirk of Nature they are going to correct. By the time they get through processing us all in an equal environment, they assure us they will have leveled us all down to where we are all equal.

This will only be too true, for the White Race will be leveled down to where they are all equal to a horde of miserable slaves, whereas every Jew, on the other hand, will be a king. Not only do both communism and Christianity preach the equality of the individual, but they also preach the equality of races, another vicious lie thrown in the face of Nature. Both creeds have a very tricky dogma that is rather nebulous and confusing, not to say contradictory, in itself. They both, therefore, have set up a hierarchy that interprets what the correct dogma of the day is and everyone is to toe the line or suffer the consequences of an entrenched power structure. Christianity and communism both have had their schisms. In the case of Christianity, the followers that differed were called heretics and in the case of communism, those that stray from the official line are called deviationists. In the case of Christianity, the Great Schism, of course, was during the Reformation when the Protestant segment developed and broke away from the Catholic Church. It then proceeded to split and splinter in a thousand different directions from there on out, all to the detriment and destruction of the White Race. The first great split, of course, was when the Byzantine Empire split from the Roman or Western half.

Among the communists there were a number of schisms such as the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks, and a number of other schisms, before the communists ever came to power. After they did come to power, there were the Stalinist communists and the Trotskyite communists, the latter being vigorously pursued and purged from the ranks. Now we presumably have the Mao wing of the communist party and for a while we had the Tito deviationists, and so on. In any case, the main idea in Christianity and communism is the same: On top of a confusing and impossible dogma sits a tight powerful hierarchy which dictates and interprets what the line of its followers must be, and terror, death and reprisal are the consequences to those who dare to think for themselves.

It is not at all surprising that the archenemy of both these Jewish creeds is Adolf Hitler, because he dared to come out with a healthy, natural social structure that embodied those principles that were in harmony with the natural laws, and with the healthy instincts for the preservation of the White Race. We, therefore, find the Jewish press, the communist press, and Christianity, all in chorus, denouncing Adolf Hitler, and telling us what a terrible, terrible man he was. All perpetrate and repeat over and over again the same Jewish lies about Hitler that the Jews themselves have dreamed up and supplied to their toadying stooges. The similarities between these creeds go on and on. Both preach the destruction of the present society. They especially zero in on the destruction and downgrading of the more creative and productive elements of society as a whole. Both denounce and vilify the better elements of established society and rejoice at human failures and weaknesses, thereby claiming to prove the correctness of their communist-Christian theory.

The Jews, who are the perpetrators of communism, envision the United Nations headquarters to finally rest in Israel and in particular, in Jerusalem. Christianity too, continuously keeps talking about Zion, the New Jerusalem, and looks to Jerusalem as the Holy Land, its origin and spiritual headquarters. Both of these Jewish creeds consistently follow policies which are disastrous to the welfare of the White Race. I have already gone into considerably detail about the catastrophic effects of Christianity on the great White Roman civilization. I have also pointed out previously that the Jews in communist Russia killed off 20,000,000 of the best White Russians.

However, the programs and policies of both these creeds extend much further than these two major catastrophes of history and to point out how disastrous the effects of both Christianity and communism have been upon the fortunes of the White Race would require a whole volume in itself. I believe we have scattered throughout this book a mass of such examples that it is hardly necessary to again repeat them here. Another similarity that manifests itself in both of these Jewish creeds is that both have an incurable ability to put forth a profuseness of verbiage that is extremely vague and beclouded with confusion. Not only is the verbiage profuse, but incredibly lacking in substance. This is an old Jewish trick to confuse and confound the minds of their opposition, the latter being deceived into thinking that all this vast collection of words must have some higher meaning beyond their comprehension.

To further destroy and beat back the opposition, both creeds have developed to a high state the art of hurling vicious trigger words and hate words at their opponents. The Christians developed such hate-trigger words as atheist, heathen, heretic, apostate, blasphemy, pagan, sinner and anti-Christ. The communists have developed a whole stable of similar trigger words, and some of these are Fascist, Nazi, racist, bigot, prejudice, and anti-Semitic. Without anyone really stopping to analyze what each of these words mean and why they should be considered as bad, these words have been developed to a high state of implied evil so that by just merely calling these names, you need not really debate the issues, but mercilessly strike down your opponents without resorting to any debate or reasoning whatsoever. If the similarities between Christianity and communism seem rather striking, there is a very good reason for their parallel ideology. That reason is, of course, they were both concocted by the Jewish power structure for the common objective of destroying the White Race. Unfortunately, up to this point, both their ideologies have been devastatingly effective.

It is partially the purpose of this book and the Creativity Movement to confront this devastating attack on the mind of the White Race and expose these twin Jewish ideologies for what they are. Furthermore, I am firmly convinced, and it is my measured conclusion, that the Jews could never have foisted modern communism on a long suffering humanity, had they not first softened up, unhinged and confused the intellect of the White Race with the fallacious snares of Christianity. It is therefore the further objective of Creativity to help straighten out the befuddled thinking of the White Race to where they then can, and will, expunge both of these twin Jewish scourges from the face of this planet.

======================================================================================================

Although BK was correct about Christianity and Communism being Jewish Twins
or stem from the same original source, the Jews, there are many other Jewish-
sourced and promoted ideological poisons stemming from the Hydra of this one
Race/Ethnic group/Religion:
Image
The 19th-century French artist Gustave Moreau
was influenced by the Beast of Revelation in his
depiction of the Hydra.


For example, in addition to the Jewish Twins of Christianity and Communism,
the following ideologies are also all from Jewish sources and are promoted by
them.
Image
Caeretan black-figure hydria (c. 346 BC)

What we do need today are Aryan heroes like Hercules and his nephew
Iolaus to finally kill this Hydra and not just its heads but the root source
of all of those poisonous ideologies and put any immortal one under a
very big rock and forever prevent it from causing any more harm to our
White Race.

Be a hero, and help us now to slay the Hydra, or the root source,
by joining or supporting the National Alliance here today!

Best regards,
Cosmotheist

Image
Earth, with "C"'s surrounding it from
both sides, and protecting it, our only
home for now, with our Cosmotheism.

User avatar
Wade Hampton III
Posts: 2339
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Wade Hampton III » Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:28 pm

I have probably said this before, but I must say it again. I consider myself very fortunate
to have lived long enough to read words such as these and know that the writer is still among
the living. Now I know why Nathan Hale said, "I regret that I have only one life to lose
for my country!"

:!:

Cosmotheist

Re: Is Christianity Dead Set on the Destruction of Whites?

Post by Cosmotheist » Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:50 am

Wade Hampton III wrote:I have probably said this before, but I must say it again. I consider myself very fortunate
to have lived long enough to read words such as these and know that the writer is still among
the living. Now I know why Nathan Hale said, "I regret that I have only one life to lose
for my country!"

:!:
Thank you for your kind words, WHIII, and likewise,
to all of our readers and for whom we do write them.

We have much to learn and emulate from all of our
heroes or whether they are mythological or historical,
like Mr. Nathan Hale!

I regret that I have only one life to lose for my White
Race! :D

Best regards,
Cosmotheist

Image
Earth, with "C"'s surrounding it from
both sides, and protecting it, our only
home for now, with our Cosmotheism.

Post Reply