White Biocentrism

Dr. William Pierce was a panpsychist, which means that he believed that there was a creative force immanent in nature, an organizing principle beyond the four forces recognized in physics: strong nuclear, weak nuclear, electromagnetism, and gravity. He founded a religion, Cosmotheism, in which a weak form of panpsychism is a central tenet.

I'm a skeptic. Rather than being a Cosmotheist, I'm sort of a cosmoatheist. I don't believe in any organizing principle that has the rise of consciousness, or of intelligent life, as its aim. Rather, I think only that the laws of physics and the conditions within our universe make consciousness and intelligent life rather improbable possibilities.

I think it was happenstance. We lucked up when Earth acquired a rotation-stabilizing large moon, just enough water to form oceans and a robust hydrological cycle but leave plenty of land area above water, and an orbit in the habitable zone of our sun, which itself had its physical characteristics within the range suitable for the appearance and evolution of life.

Even in a universe as large as the one we see around us, that much favorable coincidence wasn't guaranteed to happen. But it did — and so did a lot of other fortunate events during our evolutionary history — so here we are.

When we look around for life that didn't originate on Earth, we find nothing. We have looked high and low. In the radio spectrum, we find no signals from alien civilizations. In the atmospheres of exoplanets, we have found no convincing evidence of intelligent life. Despite a false alarm or two, our optical and infrared telescopes have detected no megastructures of intelligent design.

In summary, we have never seen anything that would convince a well-educated jury that there's any life anywhere else in the universe, except within our own solar system.

If that is ever going to change, then we are the ones who will be doing the changing. The Life of Earth really ought to spread at least throughout the Milky Way Galaxy, and, even better, to other nearby galaxies additionally. Let there be this island of consciousness, of intelligence, of appreciation in our universe, until the last star in it ceases to shine — and maybe even longer than that.

Because, even here in the solar system, the party need not be over when Earth becomes uninhabitable 500 million years from now, nor yet when the sun leaves the main sequence and becomes an orange sub-giant five billion years from now, nor yet when the sun becomes a full-fledged red giant star six billion years from now, nor yet when the sun becomes a white dwarf 6.5 billion years from now, nor even when that white dwarf has cooled to the point where its habitable zone lies entirely below its Roche limit, 16 billion years from now.

When Earth becomes another planet like Venus is already, humans should be living on Mars and inside hollowed-out asteroids, and in large space stations scattered throughout the solar system.

When the sun becomes a sub-giant star, humans can colonize the moons of Jupiter and Saturn and have just a fine time there.

When the sun becomes a red giant star, humans should be living quite well in the Kuiper Belt, inside space stations having circular orbits with a radius of about 50 AU.

When the sun becomes a white dwarf aged two billion years, humans can move back down, close to the sun, and live in the new habitable zone — and they can live there for almost nine billion years before the habitable zone drops below the Roche limit.

After that, they can live in orbit around Jupiter and/or Saturn, and stay warm and keep the lights on by fusing deuterium from the gas giants' atmospheres into helium. And they can keep doing that for more than a trillion years, provided that they never lose their technological capability to do D-He fusion. (Of course, if they ever do, they'll all die.)

And, of course, there should be at least a galaxy full of other stars near which humans, or their evolutionary descendants, are carrying out similar strategies of energy economy.

But in order to get to that Long Future for the Life of Earth, we must survive the foolishness of diversity and of racial mixing that plague us in the present. Astrophysical philosophers keep musing about a Great Filter that lies ahead of us, which will probably take us to extinction and prevent our gaining the security of interstellar colonization. What they don't see — or, more likely, what they are pretending not to notice for selfish reasons — is that we are already neck-deep in that Great Filter.

Diversity, Inclusion, Equity — Marxism — is what threatens to sacrifice all the quintillions of people in the billions of generations that are yet unborn. These evil leftists are the forces of death, disguised as forces of "social justice." If unchecked, they will return the universe to its original lifeless condition, in which there will be no one to appreciate it, no actors to form purposes, no intelligence to discover its secrets. The universe will become meaningless and worthless, with no observers to attribute to it any sense of meaning and grandness.

The more these Marxist DIE policies infect our government and our corporate management, the less competent they become. In particular, they will lose the ability to foster advances in technology that we depend upon to fulfill the mission, hereinbefore described, allotted to us by circumstance. Further, these entities will lose the ability to maintain the technical level that we already have. And that is really what triggers the Great Filter.

In order to climb to our present level of technological sophistication, humans had to use up all of the most serviceable fossil fuels and all of the highest-grade metal ores. Now that we have the technology that we do, we can go on with lower grades of fossil fuels and of metal ores.

However, if we ever lose our competence with technology and fall into barbarism and primitive forms of living, we will not be able to repeat our climb to the technological level that we presently have. Why not? Because there will not be enough time, during which Earth will remain habitable, for natural processes to create another trillion barrels of light, sweet crude oil or lift another load of high grade metal ores up from our planet's mantle.

We'll be stuck, like a fellow who locked his car with the keys still inside it — only worse, because we could do nothing to recover from the situation.

The Great Filter that might cause the extinction of all the Life of Earth is here already. It wears a deceptive mask, and it has a large fan club. It is eroding human technical competence at a rate that we can actually measure within a fraction of a single human lifespan.

Marxism must be destroyed, utterly and completely. Anyone who promotes DIE policies should be stripped of rank and of wealth, if not of life itself. They are the enemies and would-be assassins of all the life in the universe that we know about, and, if we don't destroy them, they will destroy all life.

Excellent, David! I can picture you and Pierce having that conversation.

Jewish Marxism must be destroyed for sure if our race is to survive and prosper. You say, "But in order to get to that Long Future for the Life of Earth, we must survive the foolishness of diversity and of racial mixing that plague us in the present."

Dr. Pierce concentrated on that in bold and developed Cosmotheism as the spiritual basis to unite our best people. He didn't see cosmoatheism as the religion of the future, but Cosmotheism, so that's what we in the Alliance will promote as we build a community of like-minded, racially responsible Whites.

Cosmoatheism and panpsychism? That's a hard sell with which to counter DEI. Cosmotheism, not so much, especially as the alternative belief system to clear the ground of the superstitious Semitic creed that has held our people back for centuries.

Destroy Marxism-- the concept of destroying a pattern of thought held by Jews. How would you destroy thoughts? By removing the thinkers with these Aryan-destroying thoughts from having any means of influence over our own minds -- and -- replacing it with thoughts that are in tune with our racial thought. Is it possible to simply turn our backs on all Semitic influences? It is, if we learn to recognize it, communicate it to others, then reject it utterly. Become intolerant of that which destroys us through Jewish mind-poison.

From experience, I went through this with the Semitically-originated nonsense called Christianity. Or Christinsanity if you want. The contradictions, superstitions, and the ultimate goal of death while submitting oneself to a Jewish anthropomorphic "god" and its perceived will simply made no good sense and so I turned my back on it as being a ridiculous "philosophy" of anything. It was insane. Turning my back on it isn't enough though, one must have a better philosophy with which to live life by and communicate to others within our racial family both the insanity of Jewish thought and its detrimental effects upon our kind and a better form of thought that is suitable to us.

I have a question about the aims of Cosmoatheism though, is this a rejection of our upward drive towards perfection -- towards godhood if you like -- at its core?

Jim Mathias: "I have a question about the aims of Cosmoatheism though, is this a rejection of our upward drive towards perfection -- towards godhood if you like -- at its core?"

As far as I know, cosmoatheism does not have a goal. Nor does it proscribe any white efforts to improve the white race, so that it reaches a point where it would be justified in declaring itself divine. Cosmoatheism does not have tenets by which to replace those of Cosmotheism. Cosmoatheists, such as myself, share most (perhaps all) of the political objectives that Cosmotheists have. We simply doubt whether there exists an organizing principle in nature that requires or fosters the rise of life, and then of conscious, intelligent life. That is a Cosmotheist belief, which cosmoatheists don't have. We regard life, and consciousness, as something that nature's laws permit in the small parts of the universe having the most favorable (and least adverse) conditions. By far, the greater part of the universe is hostile to life. We don't think that there's anything immanent in nature that cares one way or the other about where life or consciousness actually do arise.

One of the difficulties that a species has in surviving a Great Filter could be that they don’t recognize it as a filter. They think they’re doing “good,” acting “justly,” or pursuing “wisdom,” i.e., behaving in perfect accordance with The Right Thing To Do. And they do it. And then they are gone.

Such people are morally confused — they don’t understand what morality is, what purpose it evolved for. Moral systems evolve to aid in the survival of their practitioner groups. A proper moral system is not a universalist system; it does not equally support the interests of all groups, but rather the interests of the practitioner group only.

The highest value in any proper moral system is the survival of the practitioner group. Why? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth nor justice, nor freedom, have any value at all to extinct peoples. Because only to something alive may anything else be good. A rock doesn’t care whether you hit it with a hammer, but a mouse does.

There are many improper moral systems in which something other than the survival of the practitioner group is given the highest value. Properly speaking, all of those moral systems are, themselves, immoral. Sooner or later, a group practicing an improper moral system will encounter circumstances in which their survival is in conflict with whatever that other thing is. When that happens, they will either abandon their improper moral system and take up a proper one, or else they will die, and their improper moral system will vanish along with them.