White Biocentrism

Will Williams wrote:Have there been any more effective anti-communists than the Third Reich? That was, at least, until the Jew brought American might in to ally with the Bolsheviks to defeat Germany.

VINNITSA

National-Socialist propaganda poster uses the image of the bloodthirsty “Jewish Bolshevik commissar” to associate the Jew with the murder of more than 9,000 Soviet citizens in Vinnitsa, Ukraine, an atrocity committed by Stalin’s secret police in 1937–38. German forces uncovered the massacre in May 1943. Unknown artist, 1943.–Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, Washington, DC

I heard that the alliance of the US and the UK with the Soviet Union and China was just an alliance of convenience because the Axis were easier to defeat than the Soviet Union and China considering that they possessed less personnel and resources. For example, the Soviet Union and China possessed its own oil fields while the Axis did not and the combined oil produced by the US and UK allying with the Soviet Union and China was 15 times greater than what the axis possessed. The combined total of the equipment possessed by the US, UK, Soviet Union, and China was approximately 3 times what the Axis possessed with 600,000 aircraft, 250,000 tanks, 1,000,000 cannons, and 800 ships while the Axis only possessed an estimated 200,000 aircraft, 80,000 tanks, 300,000 cannons, and 250 ships. Additionally, the combined total number of soldiers that the US, UK, Soviet Union and China possessed was 80,000,000 while the Axis had only 30,000,000.

N567 wrote:I heard that the alliance of the US and the UK with the Soviet Union and China was just an alliance of convenience because the Axis were easier to defeat than the Soviet Union and China considering that they possessed less personnel and resources. For example, the Soviet Union and China possessed its own oil fields while the Axis did not and the combined oil produced by the US and UK allying with the Soviet Union and China was 15 times greater than what the axis possessed. The combined total of the equipment possessed by the US, UK, Soviet Union, and China was approximately 3 times what the Axis possessed with 600,000 aircraft, 250,000 tanks, 1,000,000 cannons, and 800 ships while the Axis only possessed an estimated 200,000 aircraft, 80,000 tanks, 300,000 cannons, and 250 ships. Additionally, the combined total number of soldiers that the US, UK, Soviet Union and China possessed was 80,000,000 while the Axis had only 30,000,000.

That's all very interesting but what does it have to do with Holodomor?

Will Williams wrote:

N567 wrote:I heard that the alliance of the US and the UK with the Soviet Union and China was just an alliance of convenience because the Axis were easier to defeat than the Soviet Union and China considering that they possessed less personnel and resources. For example, the Soviet Union and China possessed its own oil fields while the Axis did not and the combined oil produced by the US and UK allying with the Soviet Union and China was 15 times greater than what the axis possessed. The combined total of the equipment possessed by the US, UK, Soviet Union, and China was approximately 3 times what the Axis possessed with 600,000 aircraft, 250,000 tanks, 1,000,000 cannons, and 800 ships while the Axis only possessed an estimated 200,000 aircraft, 80,000 tanks, 300,000 cannons, and 250 ships. Additionally, the combined total number of soldiers that the US, UK, Soviet Union and China possessed was 80,000,000 while the Axis had only 30,000,000.

That's all very interesting but what does it have to do with Holodomor?

I was just mentioning it as additional information. And when I mention the word Holodomor, I use it to refer to all of the Capitalists persecuted by the Communists, not just the Ukrainians.