David Duke Debates Alex Jones

[Michael Olanich]

David Duke Debates Alex Jones
Published by on August 20th, 2015

https://youtu.be/VuXNMkBJbNg

by Alan Kidd

DAVID DUKE did very well in this debate with Alex Jones — and I’m downright surprised Jones had him on. Of course he described him as “ex-KKK,” “klansman,” etc., and equated him with people who say the Catholics are behind all the treachery in the world. Jones says he is just “so confused and was getting a headache in all of this. …after all there are bad people in all groups, Catholics, the masons, not just the Jews, and so forth ad infinitum…” (rolling eyes)

Jones described himself as libertarian and stated he was for the free market and libertarian principles. I guess he doesn’t know that the libertarian movement has long since been a side project of the money power he claims to be against. The people leading the libertarian movement don’t really go to that much trouble to mask their relationships.

The article by Memehunter on how moneyed interests control “Austrian” and libertarian institutions caught my attention three years ago, as back in the 90s I was a big subscriber to financial newsletters — and Bill Bonner of Agora Publishing was, and still is actually, the big fish in financial newsletter publishing, sometimes called copy editing. Con-men all, writing of fear, doom and gloom in politics and finance — which sells better than optimism — their experts in one of their over 50 publications had something for everyone. Emerging markets, offshore accounts, hard assets, gold and silver, energy, agriculture, insider activity, high tech — I’ve been through it all. To be honest, I have gained some insights from these newsletters. But, reading them while awake, one could see patterns develop: Even though they seemed like “conservatives,” internationalism and libertine values seemed to be a common denominator. It took me a while to see this because, at the same time, I was out there “kicking ass and taking names” in the business world. When one is making a good deal of money and enjoying the sexual benefits thereof one does not “need” to see any deeper reality — one does not want to see it! And one needs to do a lot of reading to see these patterns develop.

Michael Collins Piper had suspected that Alex Jones was loosely connected to British Intelligence and this would be consistent with the old Hegelian Dialectic of creating the problem (communism, Leftist tyranny), wait for and encourage the reaction, and when all seems useless, step in with the solution you always wanted in the first place — a so called 21st Century “Free Market” with cheap labor, open borders, and little regulation; all kinds of personal “liberties,” abortion on demand, gay/open marriage, porn, et cetera (libertarianism). They have the people begging for something different, something which only a few wise sages can disclose to us. Sages like Alex Jones. Jones does not advocate, to my knowledge anyway, abortion, porn, and “gay marriage,” but yet he self-identifies as “libertarian.” So you know where that is going.

Libertarianism — it’s a sweet temptation. People think they can have it all — irresponsible money and irresponsible sex. But in the battle for biological survival that’s a guaranteed losing strategy. So what are the motivations of the oh-so-intelligent people who want us to adopt it?

* * *
http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/08/dav ... lex-jones/

[Wade Hampton III]

There IS one item that can be gleaned from all of this "Libertarian" chatter, and that is USofA banks.
They have now become part of the Wall Street casino. As in Greece, your deposits are no longer "yours."
You are merely a "creditor" to the bank. If you have anything of substance in them, get out now!
You do not have to join Robin Leach and "go offshore." Just find yourself a sound Credit Union!

[A White Nationalist]

I listened to every single second of the debate.

My impressions:

▶ It wasn't a debate. More like "I believe this, and you believe that." Duke said his peace, Jones his. That was the gist of it.

▶ Duke finally confessed that he worshipped a JEW - when, after Jones asked him if he "was a Christian", Duke replied in the affirmative.

▶ Jones got Duke to admit that "not all JEWS are bad" and that "not all JEWS are out to destroy whites". In other words, he got Duke to admit that Jared Taylor's view of JEWS is the more rational one - not his.

Duke got to say his peace and Jones won the aforementioned points. It was not "a slam dunk".

[David York]

I listened to every single second of the debate.

My impressions:

▶ It wasn't a debate. More like "I believe this, and you believe that." Duke said his peace, Jones his. That was the gist of it.

▶ Duke finally confessed that he worshipped a JEW - when, after Jones asked him if he "was a Christian", Duke replied in the affirmative.

▶ Jones got Duke to admit that "not all JEWS are bad" and that "not all JEWS are out to destroy whites". In other words, he got Duke to admit that Jared Taylor's view of JEWS is the more rational one - not his.

Duke got to say his peace and Jones won the aforementioned points. It was not "a slam dunk".

I think David Duke did a good job, he pretty much stole the show and put Alex Jones in his place. The fact that Alex Jones put this debate on his website and took it down after a few hours (in which time the commentators showed overwhelming support for Duke) made Alex Jones look very, very bad. People who are fans of Alex Jones are probably aware of this inconsistency and are probably starting to realize that Alex Jones is on the wrong track. Alex Jones probably regrets having Duke on. They like to bash people like Duke and make them look like they are on the fringe of society, but whenever they post a video with him in it the people who watch it and leave comments seem to overwhelmingly agree with Duke.

[Michael Olanich]

I believe Duke did a good job as well, aside from the religious disagreements we may have with him.

Most of the people who listen to Alex Jones will not criticize the Jewish power structure because Jones always wraps up the elite in the general term of "globalists," acting as if it's not one group of people who run the show but instead groups of all races collaborating with each other, which is not truthful.

If Duke was able to open at least one quarter of Jones' audience as to who really run things, then that is a victory in itself.

[Rise Above]

Watched this on YouTube. Alex Jones seems to be under Jewish orders to deny they have any power. I lost any respect I had for the man which wasn't much. David Duke did a great job of getting awareness of Jewish power running america with media empires, banking institutions, government campaign lobbyist with huge AIPAC money for politicans that will vote for the highest bidder.