Neomasculinity is something discussed on the blog
http://www.returnofkings.com and in the "manisphere" regularly. The toxins of feminism, forced equality and the constant war against White men and boys have combined with the mind numbing hum of the Controlled Media driven by the advertising media to create a backlash.
I read two of Jack Donovan's books: "The Way of Men" and "A Sky with no Eagles." Both are well written and cover the topic completely ...however... Donovan identifies himself as an "androphile" which is a fancy way for him to identify as bi-sexual leaning towards men. So there's that.
For us in the Alliance these "movements" are all peripheral. They are tangents. As we build our organizational culture (which will serve as the basis for a new White culture in the future) men and women will be encouraged to work within their natural roles. We will not tolerate feminism in any form just the same way we will not be as welcoming of "girliemen" or men who are "light in their loafers."
Mein Kampf Manheim pg 408:
"Here the folkish state must proceed from the assumption that a man of little scientific education but physically healthy, with a good, firm charachter, imbued with the joy of determination and will power, is more valuable for the national community than a cleave weakling."
The same passage (MK II,ii,p452) translated by Savitri Devi:
"
The national State...must act on the presumption that a man of moderate education, but sound in body, firm in character, and filled with joyous self-confidence and power of will, is of more value to the community than a highly educated weakling."
I'll quote from the same chapter of
Gold in the Furnace Vanessa is currently reading on ADV (Chapter 11 The Constructive Side):
"We hate the idea of of "equality" of men and women, forced upon the Western world more shamelessly than ever since the time of the First World War. For one it is nonsense. No male and female of the same species endowed by Nature with complimentary abilities for the fulfillment of complimentary destinies, can be "equal." They are different, and cannot be anything else but different, however much one might try to give them the same training and make them do the same work. It is also a nefarious idea; for the only way one can, I do not say make men and women "equal" -- that is impossible -- but force them, willy-nilly into the same artificial mould; accustom them to the same type of life, is by robbing women of her femininity and man of his virile qualities, i.e., by spoiling both, and spoiling the race.