Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Summaries and links to news items
Post Reply
Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Mon May 16, 2016 1:39 am

Susan Rice: U.S. national-security agencies too white
In the halls of power ... America is still not fully reflected'

(Washington Times) In a White House often accused of being stacked with loyalists, President Obama’s national security adviser said Wednesday there are too many white people in key government posts, endangering national security because they think alike.

Speaking at Florida International University’s commencement, Susan E. Rice, who is black, said a diversified government workforce is more likely to yield “better outcomes” than a predominantly white one.

Referring to criticism that the U.S. national security workforce is “white, male and Yale,” Ms. Rice told the graduates, “In the halls of power, in the faces of our national security leaders, America is still not fully reflected.”

Read more at ... KBlAucK.99
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Fri May 20, 2016 2:40 am



The city of Ferguson, Missouri, swore in its first-ever African-American police chief this week, confirming one black leader’s suspicion about the way liberals intended to exploit the killing of Michael Brown.
“This is what the Michael Brown incident has been about all along,” Jesse Lee Peterson, founder of the nonprofit Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny, declared in an interview with WND. “It was never about racism, it was never about Michael Brown; it was about using Michael Brown in order to redistribute power – take it away from the white man and give it to the blacks and those who sympathize and agree with Barack Obama or liberals.”
Delrish Moss, a veteran of the Miami, Florida, Police Department, replaces Tom Jackson, who resigned last year after the U.S. Justice Department issued a blistering report on the practices of the Ferguson Police Department. The DOJ report scolded the Ferguson PD for harboring a bias against black residents, using excessive force and focusing their efforts on generating revenue, among other things.
The DOJ released another report the very same day, concluding that Officer Darren Wilson was not unreasonable when he used deadly force against Brown. However, they did not let Wilson’s innocence stop them from demanding numerous changes in the Ferguson PD, including the hiring of more racial minorities.
When Moss addressed his officers for the first time after being sworn in, he warned them, “If you do the job in a way that disrespects the badge that you hold, I will see to it that you are either removed from police service, or further prosecuted.”
The chief, who told CBS News he was harassed by white police as a teenager in Miami, insisted he will hold his own officers to a higher standard, saying, “I expect to clean house where I find that people need to go.”
Colin Flaherty, a reporter who documented numerous examples of black violence in his book, “White Girl Bleed a Lot,” scoffs at the notion that Ferguson police officers should be on thin ice. He pointed out violent and property crimes in Ferguson are largely committed by blacks.
“This entire episode is based on one false premise: that cops are causing the crime in Ferguson,” Flaherty told WND. “That is a lie, part of the greatest lie of our generation, the hoax of black victimization. Police are the good guys – even if they ask black people to obey the law.
“Another part of the big lie is the criminals are victims and the cops are the bad people. So everything we hear from Ferguson is based on that – so everything we hear is bound to turn into a disaster because it is based on a false idea.”
Peterson, a WND columnist and author of “The Antidote: Healing America From the Poison of Hate, Blame, and Victimhood,” agreed with Flaherty that Moss should not treat his officers like the bad guys. And he fears crime will only get worse with a liberal black chief in charge.
“Now that they’re putting this liberal police chief in there, things are not going to get better; it’s only going to get worse,” Peterson warned. “There are black liberal Democrats running the urban areas around the country – city councils, police departments, mayors – and urban areas are absolutely out of control.
“So it’s not going to get better, and who are they going to blame that on? They’re going to blame it on the whites again, saying that they don’t have the money and they don’t have this or that. They’re never going to take responsibility for their own failures.”
Moss told CNN he was driven to become a police officer because of two encounters he had with Miami police as a teenager. One time an officer searched him and called him the N-word while he was walking after dark, and another time an officer jumped out of his car and frisked him without warning.
So he decided to become a policeman to provide better service to his community than he was getting, and he later sought a high-ranking position to fire bad cops like the ones who abused him, according to the Chicago Tribune.
But Peterson doesn’t believe Moss’ background makes him the right person to turn Ferguson into a less violent city.
“You might not hear as many blacks complaining about racism now that they have a black police chief in there, but you’re not going to see the crime go down, you’re not going to see violence ending, you’re not going to see a safer and better community as a result of having a black police chief,” Peterson said.
Flaherty likewise said Moss may be more popular with black residents, but only if he proves to be soft on black crime.
“If the new chief reduces arrests, and looks the other way when black people commit crime in Ferguson, then he will be popular,” Flaherty predicted. “Because Ferguson is one of those places where, despite all the talk, criminals are more popular than cops.”
At his introduction, Moss spoke of the need to bring “nobility” back to police work. Peterson disputes the idea that police ever lost a sense of nobility in the first place.
“Nobility wasn’t taken from the police department in Ferguson; the police officers were doing their jobs,” he insisted. “They just were not allowed to do their jobs if it was a white officer on a black person because they would be called racist, they would lose their jobs, their careers would be destroyed.”
In talking about why Moss was the best choice for police chief, Ferguson City Manager De’Carlon Seewood emphasized Moss’ public relations acumen.
“He knows how to talk to citizens, talk to the press, and get them informed about changes,” Seewood said, according to KRON. “We haven’t done a good job of talking about the reforms that are being put in place.”
But Peterson said the city has its priorities in the wrong place if it wants to focus on messaging rather than enforcing the law and protecting residents from criminals.
“The police department is not a social service,” Peterson cautioned. “It’s not there to make you feel good. They’re there to keep the innocents safe and protect them from the criminals, and if this police chief goes soft it’s just going to give the criminals permission to get even worse, because they know they’re going to be catered to rather than punished.” ... -ferguson/
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Mon May 23, 2016 12:33 am

Mississippi: Whites Ordered to “Integrate”


Two Cleveland, Mississippi, schools which are only 40 percent white have been ordered to forcibly mix with neighboring 99 percent black schools—because the US Department of Justice still thinks they are too white.

US District Judge Debra Brown ruled last week that Cleveland must merge its two high schools and two middle schools to provide the “constitutionally guaranteed right of an integrated education.”


Brown ordered the district to merge East Side High, where all but one student is black, with Cleveland High, where 48 percent of students are white and 45 percent are black.

Similarly, the district must merge D.M. Smith Middle, where all but two students are black, with Margaret Green Junior High, where 41 percent of students are white and 54 percent are black.

Across the entire 3,700-student district, only about 29 percent of students are white and 67 percent are black. The state counts the remainder as Asian or Hispanic.

“The court concludes that the continued operation of East Side High and D.M. Smith as single-race schools is a vestige of discrimination and that, therefore, a plan which allows such continued operation must be rejected,” the judge wrote.

Judge Brown added that the “delay in desegregation has deprived generations of students of the constitutionally guaranteed right of an integrated education.”

Jamie Jacks, a lawyer for the district, said school board members believed they proposed constitutional options to keep open two high schools, although one local plan would have combined middle schools.

“The district’s plans allowed for student and parent choice,” Jacks wrote in a statement. “If the board appeals, it would request that the existing open enrollment plan continue while the appeal is pending.”

The school district presented expert testimony that white parents were likely to flee to private schools. Beyond Cleveland, only four of 22 other districts in Mississippi’s Delta region have student bodies less than 80 percent black.

“Six decades after the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education declared that ‘separate but equal has no place’ in public schools, this decision serves as a reminder to districts that delaying desegregation obligations is both unacceptable and unconstitutional,” Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, said in a statement.

“The court’s ruling will result in the immediate and effective desegregation of the district’s middle school and high school program for the first time in the district’s more than century-long history.”

In her ruling, Judge Brown also ordered the parties to submit a proposed timeline to implement the plan in such a way as to ensure the immediate termination of the school district’s dual system. She set the deadline for no later than 21 days from the entry of her opinion, which was issued at the end of last week.

The ruling is the clearest indication yet that the establishment has no interest in “integration”—because whites are already a minority in the Cleveland schooling system—but rather in exterminating whites completely. ... integrate/
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Fri May 27, 2016 5:34 am


Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama want us to believe that the disappearance of American jobs in “the new global economy” is as inevitable as the sun rising in the east.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

In fact, the radical left planned the liquidation of white, blue-collar working families in order to “fundamentally transform” America.

The decimation of America’s middle class and industrial strength is a case of murder, not accidental death. It was done with premeditation, malice and forethought.

The latest evidence comes from Thomas Frank, a man of the left and former Wall Street Journal columnist. His new book, “Listen, Liberal,” exposes how the radical left, the Clinton family and Wall Street deliberately liquidated the white working class of America

The story begins in the 1960s with the rise of the “youth culture” and the New Left, student activists who were smoking dope, taking over college buildings and sporting Che Guevara T-shirts and Viet Cong flags while protesting the Vietnam War.

The New Left sneered at white, blue-collar men as racists and the labor unions that represented them as bastions of white privilege that must be destroyed. After all, it was AFL-CIO construction workers who beat up anti-war protesters in the Hard Hat Riot of 1970, and white working-class voters were George Wallace’s base in his bids for the presidency.

Following the bloody riots at the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago and the Democrats’ subsequent loss to Richard Nixon, the radical left captured the Democratic Party.

Their first order of business was to purge men who work for a living from positions of influence in the party, though they had been the muscle of Democratic power since Franklin Roosevelt.

The far left executed its takeover through the McGovern-Fraser Commission, formally known as the Commission on Party Structure and Delegate Selection. The new rules eliminated blue-collar men and replaced them with upper-middle class activists whose agendas revolved around campus issues of abortion-on-demand feminism, environmentalism and affirmative action, rather than working people’s concerns of decent pay and decent jobs.

The director of the AFL-CIO’s political arm saw what was coming and said, “We aren’t going to let these Harvard-Berkeley Camelots take over our party.” He was wrong. They did.

The Democratic Party’s new bosses were born of and members of the privileged professional class. They saw a future where no one toiled in factories, where the entire country would be like them – college educated “symbolic analysts” who work with their heads, not their hands. This is the “post-industrial new economy” the Clintons and Obama tout as “inevitable,” though it’s actually a social engineering experiment on an unprecedented scale.

The party cadres set out to build their brave new world and eliminate their class enemies – read: white working people. It is in this context that we understand why Clinton and company push so-called “free trade” deals like NAFTA and Obamatrade, corporatist schemes that move America’s manufacturing assets – and jobs – to Mexico, China and elsewhere. If you believe, as do the leftists, that America has more than it deserves and Americans are racists, the global redistribution of our wealth and the death (literally) of white working people is a desired outcome, a feature not a bug.

The social engineers of the left found plenty of useful idiots and knowing enablers to help them in their project to fundamentally transform America.

Professional environmentalists enthusiastically embraced America’s de-industrialization, though unregulated industries in China and Mexico are far more destructive to air, water, forests and the people who depend on them than any of America’s EPA-supervised factories. Even the tree-huggers who weren’t consciously seeking a return to a pre-industrial era had nevertheless bought into the prevailing “America is bad” mindset of the left.

Race warriors, displaying group solidarity or guilt, were pleased to see the jobs of white Americans moving to the Third World. The talk about “raising a billion people out of extreme poverty around the world” ignores the metastasizing cancer of slavery in the export industries of Asia and the wholesale violations of human and property rights by Third World dictators and crony capitalists.

Yet the radical left found its most powerful and willing partner in the most unlikely of places: Wall Street.

It was the Clintons who struck the devil’s bargain. Wall Street wanted cheap labor; the Clintons wanted Wall Street money for themselves and their party. For 30 pieces of silver, they delivered working Americans to the slaughter. (The Republican establishment and other elements of the GOP coalition were also down with the program.)

And so, dear readers, that is how the death of American working-class whites was planned by the radical left and carried out with willing executioners at the highest levels of American politics, academia and business.

Read more at ... 1c7wuKF.99
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:41 am

Teacher 'White Privilege Conference': Whites Are Never Cured of Racism


More details are emerging about what was presented at the “White Privilege Conference” held in Madison, Wisconsin, where tax money was spent to train teachers how to annihilate “white privilege” and “white supremacy” in American schools. One session insisted that whites can never be cured of their permanent racist attitudes.
On March 30, Breitbart reported on the conference, now in its fifteenth year. Over these years, teachers have been told that whites have been pushing “white supremacy” on kids since the country was created, and that whites are so infused with racism that they aren’t even cognizant of their crimes.

The latest conference pushing this propaganda was held in Madison between March 25 and 29. A Wisconsin reporter tried to gain access to the event, but hosts denied him entrance.

However, another reporter was able to gain access without being discovered. Nick Novak of Wisconsin’s MacIver Institute attended the event and found in one session that teachers were being told that white people are like “alcoholics” with their racism. They will never be cured of it but will always be racists at heart.

Kim Radersma, a former high school English teacher in California and Colorado, was the leader of a breakout session entitled “Stories from the Front Lines of Education: Confessions of a White, High School English Teacher.” During the session, she told the teachers and administrators that “being a white person who does anti-racist work is like being an alcoholic.” She went on to say, “I will never be recovered by my alcoholism, to use the metaphor. I have to everyday [sic] wake up and acknowledge that I am so deeply imbedded with racist thoughts and notions and actions in my body that I have to choose everyday [sic] to do anti-racist work and think in an anti-racist way.”

Radersma, who is working toward her Ph. D. in critical whiteness studies at Brock University in Ontario, Canada, also trained the attendees to think that all education should be taught with a political agenda.

“If you don’t want to work for equity, get the fuck out of education,” she said. “If you are not serious about being an agent of change that helps stifle the oppressive systems, go find another job. Because you are a political figure.”

This runs contrary to the excuse that event organizers gave Wisconsin reporter Adam Tobias as a reason to bar him from the event. Tobias was told that the event was “private” and not funded by tax dollars. Therefore, it was not a public, political event open to reporters, they said.

The event was held at the Monona Terrace Community and Convention Center and was provided with an $18,375 booking event assistance payment, money that came from a fund drawn from local hotel room tax revenue.

Also, several local school districts paid thousands of dollars in registration fees, hotel stays, and transportation costs for teachers and administrators to attend. Those are also tax dollars.

Furthermore, some of the workshops sponsored by this year’s White Privilege Conference are quite political. The event offered such workshops as “Against the Tea Party Movement,” “If You Build It, They Will Come: Developing a Pre K-12 Curricular Scope and Sequence for Whiteness and Anti-Racism,” and “Climate-Change-Mind-Set: Replacing White Liberalism with Racial Justice as Our Communities Organize in Response to Climate Change.”

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston or email the author at ... om-racism/
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Fri Jun 03, 2016 6:22 pm

Thousands of Blacks Line Up for Section 8 Vouchers in Portsmouth, Va: Event Canceled Because of the Fear of a Riot

As you read this sentence, consider this melancholy fact: tens of thousands of organizations exist in America dedicated to making life easier for non-whites. Conversely, these organizations, many funded with your tax dollars or through foundations solely existing because of your consumer purchases, are simultaneously working to make life harder for white people.

Countless groups exist, once again with many funded via your tax dollars or through foundations solely existing because of your consumer purchases, dedicated entirely to advancing the interests of non-whites; an oft-mentioned side effect of this "noble" crusade is trampling upon the interests of white people.

If you were to even publicly state white people have collective interests, so-called conservatives would call you a progressive for daring to contradict the teachings of St. Ayn Rand, whose theology dictates only Statists would think in such tyrannical terms.

Meanwhile, countless groups plot the advancing of their people and their people's interest, meaning white people's interests are put on indefinite hold, so they can be taxed to be for the former's growth and prosperity.

In a more refined time period, we might classify this above scenario as slavery, a subjugated people working to ensure their masters have a life of leisure, pleasure, a never-ceasing accumulation of assets.

Well, in our case, redistributed assets.

With the disparity in wealth between white people and non-whites a cause of great concern for those dedicated to advancing the interests of non-whites, the only possible solution to dissolving white wealth (with the seizing of assets a possible solution obviously considered) is to destroy the equity in homes owned by white people and the long-term viability of majority white communities.

READ MORE: http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspo ... n.html?m=1
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Mon Jun 06, 2016 2:37 am

Swedish family forced from their home. Government says it’s for immigrants now.
by Steve Goode • June 1, 2016


A taxpaying Swedish family has been forced to leave their home because the government decided it is now for people who “come from other countries.”

Uffe Rustan and his two sons lived in a home they rented in the city of Lidingö which all of them were born and raised in.

Lidingö city government originally said it would let the family rent the home permanently, but it now refuses to extend their tenancy and says they must leave by August 2016.

“I was evicted from my home over the phone. When I asked for the reason, he said that people come from other countries. He left the news and basically just said have a nice weekend,” said Uffe Rustan.

“We have quite recently moved here, and just when it starts to feel like home, we are evicted.”

“It feels like I’m worthless, even though I pay taxes and my kids go to school here. If only they had been in kindergarten or something . . . but you cannot put a family on the streets for another family,”

“It feels a little depressing. I think this is about morality and how to treat people, that everyone should be treated equally. But apparently I’m worth less than others.”

Rustan is taking the Lidingö city government to court and charging them with breach of contract.

“Probably, we have to move from here, and I still do not think it is right. I can stay with friends, but it will be the worst for the children.”

The Swedish establishment has tried to turn the country into a global mish-mash of third-world countries at the expense of local Swedish people.

“Diversity is our strength” they shout loudly from their ivory towers and gated suburbs.

So then why is it third-world countries are not the first ones to have it? Why is it always the White places that must have “diversity”? That have no choice but to accept?

It’s got nothing to do with mixing the world or any of that other hippy talk. It’s simply about getting rid of White areas.

Africa is not becoming minority Black. Asia is not becoming minority Asian.

It is only Western countries which are becoming minority White, and this is the result of a deliberate and forced agenda.

It’s called White genocide. ... rants-now/
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:47 am

Paul Kersey’s Open Letter To Donald Trump: Defend Freedom Of Association (And Property Values) Against Obama’s Racial Socialism ... -socialism
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:03 am

Elite New York school separates White kids, puts them in self-hate classes

by Steve Goode • July 3, 2016 •


White children as young as 6 years-old are being separated from non-White students, and put into their own “Whiteness” classes.

The Bank Street School for Children in Manhattan, New York city, is putting White children through these classes to teach them that they were born “racist” because they have “European ancestry“.

Meanwhile, “kids of color” are put in a “dedicated space” to instill pride in their race. They are also apparently rewarded with special privileges and treats that White students do not get.

An anonymous parent who has children at the school said: “Ever since Ferguson, the school has been increasing anti-white propaganda in its curriculum,”

Administrators at the school tried to justify their anti-White propaganda by claiming that other schools in America do it, and several of them are in New York.

Parents say that under the “Racial Justice and Advocacy” education program, teachers are pressuring White children into feeling guilty about their ancestry, by teaching a skewed, anti-White history of America.

“One hundred percent of the curriculum is what whites have done to other races,” another anonymous parent said. “They offer nothing that would balance the story.”

“Any questions they can’t answer they rationalize under the pretense of ‘institutional racism’, which is never really defined.”

And this White self-hate education works. Parents say their children are coming home crying and saying “I’m a bad person.”

This is just sick! What kind of a monster brainwashes innocent children to hate themselves?!?

Political correctness is a religion, and Whites are the devils.

We are taught to hate ourselves for simply being born White. This is sick, but unfortunately a lot of people have fallen ill with this self-hate bug.

Whites haven’t always been angels, but neither have we been devils. That’s why it’s wrong to destroy White majorities (White genocide). We have a right to exist just as much as any other group on this planet.

This just goes to prove that all these “anti-racists” are in fact just evil, pathetic, anti-Whites hiding behind nice words. ... e-classes/
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Benjamin Bice
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Black/Non-White Institutional Racism

Post by Benjamin Bice » Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:30 am

'Don't Tread on Me' now racial harassment?

Feds to rule after black employee complained about insignia on co-worker's cap

(FOX NEWS) Wearing a Gadsden Flag hat to work could be considered racial harassment, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the government body that oversees “hostile work environment” harassment claims against federal agencies.

The iconic flag, which originates from the Revolutionary War, features coiled snake above the words “Don’t Tread On Me.” In recent years, it has become a favorite symbol of the Tea Party movement and conservative activists.

Get your favorite flag from the WND Superstore’s flag department, from “Don’t Tread on Me” and the “Union Civil War” flags to the Bennington, Culpeper, Betsy Ross and more.

Earlier this year, the EEOC received a complaint from a “Shelton,” an African American, who charged that his employer (the federal government) had subjected him to racial discrimination when a coworker “repeatedly wore a cap with an insignia of the Gadsden Flag.” Shelton (not his real name) said he found the cap to be “racially offensive” because the man who designed it in 1775, Christopher Gadsden, was a slave owner and because the insignia was a “historical indicator of white resentment against blacks stemming largely from the Tea Party.”

Read more at ... Hj3VRgK.99
Professor of Anti-White Discrimination and Racial Hypocrisy

Post Reply