The “Samson Option”; Jewish Hubris on Display

[Trenton]

During the 1960’s, the term “Samson Option” was coined in Israel to refer to a strategy of nuclear deterrence. It is a doctrine of geostrategy based on the Biblical story of Samson, who, when captured by the Philistines, prays for strength, and tears down the temple in which he has been bound, killing the Philistines who captured him, along with himself.

The essence of this doctrine should be familiar to us in the Western world who have dealt with, or even conversed at any length with Jews about geopolitics. Whenever Israel feels they are about to lose a war, they threaten nuclear armageddon. In the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israel’s prime minister Meir gave the order for warheads to be readied, and told President Nixon in thinly-veiled terms that there would be hell to pay if American aid didn’t keep flowing at the rate Israel desired. This is not a conspiracy theory, nor is it ‘antisemitic’ to say. Wikipedia, a Jewish controlled outlet, confirms it all, and backs it up with reliable sources.

It is not known if this strategy has been employed by Israel in the last 5 decades, probably because they’ve been kicking the snot out of the Arabs in that time, and felt no need to. Still, I’ll close this off by sharing the opinions of some Israeli and Jewish authors on the Samson Option, just in case anyone here wasn’t convinced of the Jews’ hatred of the entire world generally, and Whites in particular.

Israeli reporter Ari Shavit writes of Israel's nuclear strategy: "Concerning anything and everything nuclear, Israel would be much, much more cautious than the United States and NATO. Concerning anything and everything nuclear, Israel would be the responsible adult of the international community.“ Yeah, ‘responsible,’ let’s go with that.

In 2002 Ron Rosenbaum, writing for the Los Angeles Times, wrote of the possibility of the doctrine as a retaliation strategy. I quote!:
“Israel has been building nuclear weapons for 30 years. The Jews understand what passive and powerless acceptance of doom has meant for them in the past, and they have ensured against it. Masada was not an example to follow—it hurt the Romans not a whit, but Samson in Gaza? What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a Nuclear Winter. Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens? For the first time in history, a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away—unlike the Armenians, Tibetans, World War II European Jews or Rwandans—have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?”
This is called hatred. Genocidal hatred. It doesn’t matter if you don’t hate them. They will bring the whole world crashing down just because they hate you.