Question for John J. Ubele
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 6:16 pm
John, since you are now living in Iran I'm wondering if Iranian journalists are as much in the dark about understanding Jewish control of American media and politicians as this one was that interviewed Dr. Pierce 22 years ago: https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/01/fast-and-furious/
LAST WEEK I gave an interview to an English-language radio station in Teheran. The program was “The Islamic Voice of Iran.” We talked about a number of things, including Ariel Sharon’s visit to the White House, which was taking place at the time, and about President Bush’s popularity ratings. The Iranian interviewer asked me whether Bush would take a more sensible, pro-American policy in the Middle East or would continue taking orders from Israel, to the detriment of American interests, the way the Clinton administration had.
Of course, I explained to him that there was really no difference between Republicans and Democrats in that regard. They both dance to whatever tune the Jews are playing at the moment, and that George Bush would no more dare to disobey the Jews than Bill Clinton would. I told the Iranian interviewer that there are minor differences between the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, with the Democrats pandering a bit more to the welfare class and the Republicans paying a bit more lip service to things such as military preparedness and energy production, but that on the really essential issues — immigration, racial policy, media control, foreign policy — both parties do what they’re told and don’t give the Jews any back talk.
The Iranian had a hard time understanding this. If one party — the Democrats, say — were controlled by Jews and supported Jewish interests, then surely there would be another party — presumably the Republicans — representing the interests of the American people. He couldn’t understand how the Jews, making up only 2.5 per cent of the U.S. population, could have the whole political process under their control and in particular could dictate U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, regardless of who is in the White House or which party controls the Congress. What about the other 97.5 per cent of the population? They also have interests, and they can vote. Why aren’t their interests supported by some political party?
The difficulty my Iranian interviewer had in understanding how politics works in America has two facets. One of these is the dominant influence the mass media of news and entertainment, which are largely in the hands of the country’s very small Jewish minority, have on public opinion and attitudes, on the mass culture, and on the political process. In Iran tradition is much more important in determining public opinion. And Iran is a much more homogeneous country, at least in a cultural and religious sense, than is the United States. In America the media have to a large extent weaned the people away from their traditions and from their cultural and religious roots and substituted a made-in-Hollywood trash-culture with ersatz traditions in their place. The media are increasingly important in influencing public opinion everywhere in the developed countries — even in Iran, no doubt — but nowhere has the process been as thorough and as destructive as it has been in the United States.