Jew Paper Markets Separate From Physical Markets!

User avatar
Wade Hampton III
Posts: 2339
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:40 pm
Location: Pontiac, SC

Re: Jew Paper Markets Separate From Physical Markets!

Post by Wade Hampton III » Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:42 pm

Mark Nestman posted...

A question I’m asked a lot by clients is, “Are markets manipulated?”
My answer is always the same: “Of course they are.” Given the nature
of capitalism, it could hardly be otherwise. Investors with exceptionally
good access to market knowledge generally make more successful investments
than those who don’t. The most obvious example of this phenomenon is
insider trading. I’ve never understood why anyone thinks this is a crime.
I consider the individuals involved to be providing a useful service,
because more information makes markets more efficient and accurate – no
matter how the information was acquired. It’s the natural result of
participation in the markets by individuals with superior knowledge.
Individuals involved in insider trading move market prices up or down,
depending on the nature of the information they possess. If they acquire
negative information about a company or commodity, they can sell their
holdings, short them, buy “put” options on them, etc. If they acquire
positive information, they simply do the opposite. Everyone benefits
from more transparent pricing (if free of Jews).

It’s also possible for insiders to profit by manipulating the price
mechanism itself. This is a more destructive type of manipulation,
because it makes pricing less transparent (think Jews and Jamie Dimon).
Investors in precious metals, especially silver, have long claimed this
type of manipulation is pervasive. That’s partially a consequence of
how precious metals prices are set. Until 2015, gold and silver prices
were set or “fixed” twice daily (by Jews) in London by a group of dealers
from the city’s largest “bullion banks,” financial institutions that
clear transactions in gold. This pricing model, which originated in 1919,
lasted nearly a century. It ended in 2015, after a series of scandals
involving conflict of interest and outright manipulation of precious
metals prices by the bullion banks were brought to light. In its place,
the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) set up an electronic auction
mechanism to set prices. Even with the new system in place, some analysts
following the precious metals markets continue to believe that the prices
are being manipulated. One notorious example occurred earlier this year.
On January 28, the LBMA silver price was set 84¢ below the prevailing spot
and futures prices (Jamie Dimon covering his shorts on the COMEX). So
much for the “transparent pricing mechanism” the LBMA claimed to be
overseeing!

Even with these shortcomings, it’s now obvious that the old (Jew) pricing
system was worse. In July 2014, a silver investor sued bullion banks
Deutsche Bank, Bank of Nova Scotia, and HSBC for conspiring to manipulate
silver prices. The lawsuit later achieved class action status. This meant
that other investors could benefit if the banks were found responsible for
price manipulation. Other lawsuits followed, some alleging the manipulation
began as early as 1999. These three banks are accused of suppressing prices
on up to $30 billion (now we are talking Jew language) of silver and silver
contracts annually. This price manipulation allegedly allowed the participating
banks to generate huge profits. One way they supposedly did so was to short
the price of silver futures contracts (hello shabboz goy Jamie Dimon). Most
analysts – me included – thought the litigation would be dismissed out of
hand by the courts. Surprisingly, that didn’t happen. The first inkling
these banks took the lawsuit seriously came in April 2016, when Deutsche Bank
agreed to an out-of-court settlement. In October, it announced a $38 million
payout. The settlement terms also require Deutsche Bank to cooperate in
pursuing the case against the other defendant banks.

In the meantime, a US district judge ruled that investors may pursue antitrust
and manipulation claims against Bank of Nova Scotia and HSBC. With Deutsche
Bank turning on its co-defendants, it seems likely that investors alleging
a silver price suppression conspiracy will find their claims vindicated.
What I fail to understand, though, is why anyone is surprised. The banks saw
a market opportunity and exploited it to the fullest. What they did may or
may not have been illegal, but it was certainly profitable. I also don’t
understand why gold and silver investors think they’re powerless to fight
back against this manipulation. They can, and the remedy is very simple:
Insist on full, unencumbered ownership of physical gold and silver. If you
have precious metals in your physical possession or a safe deposit box or in
a fully-allocated holding in a private vault, neither bullion banks nor anyone
else will be able to sell your metals short. This is also the safest way to
own precious metals. That’s not to say it’s wrong to speculate on gold and
silver prices by purchasing futures contracts, exchange traded funds (ETFs),
or similar investments. Just keep in mind that the custodians of these
investments can – and often do – loan out the metals to speculators so they
can sell short. This activity is pervasive, and it directly contradicts your
interest in rising precious metals prices (think Jamie Dimon..race traitor...
...who sold out his race for easy bucks). If you hold your allocated metals
outside the country you live in, in a private vault, not a bank, you’ll be
much better prepared for the next round of financial chaos than most other
people. And unlike your money in a bank account, your metals can’t be “bailed
in.”

Wade says, "...unless you want to run into THIS fellow!"
Hotline To Mossad
Hotline To Mossad
facebook.jpg (55.49 KiB) Viewed 1371 times

Post Reply